Friends of True Israel, for this Edition, I have invited Greek Scholar, William Finck, author of the upcoming book, "The Letters of Paul," to add his comments to this Arsenal of Words, to give us the benefit of his expertise to this very important subject. Most of Mr. Finck’s comments have been incorporated into the body of this work. However, some of his more detailed comments will be enclosed in braces { }.

ARE YOU AFRAID TO READ YOUR BIBLE?

This was a question recently posed by one of my Identity friends to a Judeo-Christian acquaintance. Very often, when we in Christian Identity attempt to reason with non-Identists and explain to them the details of why the King James Version is NOT the inerrant Word of God, many react with outright hatred! The typical "King James Only" advocate will become extremely agitated and downright hostile. (This reaction, by the way, is the very antithesis of their own Christian philosophy, being a knee-jerk, hypocritical response, especially when spoken by a representative of the "God loves everybody" faction of Apostianity!!!) Many religious and secular language scholars have attested to the fact that the KJV contains up to 50,000 or more translational errors, so we in Identity are not alone in making this claim. My own position is this: The original Hebrew and Greek writings were the inspired Word of God, but the translations are not. Neither are many of the later corruptions and additions found among various manuscripts, which have occurred over many centuries and which still affect our Bibles today.

For example, numerous scholars have reported that the Trinitarian verse at I John 5:7-8 was added in the 14^th Century, as no earlier copies of the New Testament contain it. This is clear evidence of later tampering. Those two verses were most likely added by a Catholic scribe, who was anxious to insert an unequivocal Trinitarian statement within the Bible.

Anyone who thinks that the translators were "inspired by God" is under a serious delusion. {For those of you who are interested in this controversy, here is a good website: http://members.aol.com/pilgrimpub/questkjv.htm }

When we point out some of the more glaring problems associated with modern translations and ask non-Identists to re-read these passages in the light of the original intent of the authors, the actual meanings of the Hebrew and Greek words, and contextual analysis of the text, they are hesitant to do so, because the implications are staggering! To brazenly suggest that the Bible was written exclusively to the Adamic/White Race is the height of "blasphemy" in today’s brainwashed, politically correct society, but, nevertheless, the original Hebrew and Greek writings confirm that this is so. In fact, it is very easy to demonstrate that the modern "Gospel of Race-Mixing" reeks of a very recent vintage. Such doctrine was NEVER taught in Sunday School or from the pulpits prior to the 1960’s. It was in the 1960’s that this BLASPHEMY originated with the Jew-sponsored televangelists, who have continuously promised "blessings" to Christians who will "bless the Jews"…first and foremost with their money … and then with their prayers. (Paul was not speaking of mongrelized Jews in Rom. 1:16, 2:9 and 2:10. He was speaking of JUDAHITES, the pure-blooded descendants of the House of Judah. This will become clearer as you keep reading.) To suggest or infer that today’s Judeo-Christians are actually supporting the devil is a complete shock to their being, a complete reversal of their carefully laid "Biblical" foundations. It’s like trying to give an unrepentant addict a cure for his addiction. He rejects it outright, as he is afraid to become sober after years or decades of drunkenness. His state of drunkenness has become so familiar that sobriety terrifies him. And, indeed, the Judeo-Christians are "drunk" with false doctrine.

"Come hither, I will show unto thee the judgment of the Great Whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication." -- Rev. 17:1-2.

If we take the word fornication literally, here, it points to the undeniable fact that we are living in an age in which sexual promiscuity of all kinds is rampant. It spills over from the Jewish-owned, corporate media of the world, who, by the way, have also actively subsidized and promoted the overwhelmingly pro-Zionist televangelists. While the Corporate Jew sneers at Christian values, he nevertheless supports those "Christians" who support the Israeli State, since that Ideal State is much more important than Christianity itself. While these duped Judeo-Christians wait for the "blessings" of Zionism to materialize, the fabric of our society is being ripped apart, and they just can’t see it, because they are intoxicated with this false ideology. The Great Whore is nothing other than the very recent "Gospel of race-mixing," which is preached daily by the televangelists and weekly from all of the pulpits of Baal, having today become a worldwide religion, a corporate enterprise, which distorts both reality and the truth of Scripture. Although the "Gospel of Race-Mixing" is just the latest wrinkle in the fabric, the attempt to rewrite the Bible is a very old story. Indeed, we are dealing with an ancient force whose main business has always been the distortion of Scripture.

When I politely ask the adherents of this new religion, "Where is the evidence that America has been blessed by supporting the Jews?" or, "How has America been blessed by race-mixing?" there is an abrupt silence. Of course, the truth is the exact opposite. We have, in fact, been cursed by these two disingenuous doctrines. The more we bless the Jews, the deeper we sink into the quagmire of Zionism, with our sons and daughters literally sacrificing their lives for this phony cause, while the Jews secretly mock these same gullible Christians. The whole world has come to hate America, because we are perceived by some as the aggressor against the Palestinians or by others as copartners with the Israeli State in their occupation, oppression and ceaseless slaughter of Arabs and Muslims, not to mention the Christians, who have been living in and around Palestine for the last 2,000 years. The more we engage in race-mixing, the more degenerate we become. Likewise, the more we aid and abet the Jews and their criminal Zionist enterprise, the more immoral we become. Look how America has morally degenerated since the 1960’s, when these two demonic doctrines (Zionism and Multiculturalism) began to take hold in our country: homosexuality, socialistic government, illegal drug use, much higher crime rates, traumatic school violence, teenage suicides, promiscuous sexuality, an explosion of venereal disease, declining educational standards, skyrocketing debt, destruction of the work ethic, declining church attendance, religious sex scandals, just to mention a few. Is this how we are blessed? How long must we wait before the blessings begin?

If the Jews are the TRUE Israelites of the Bible, then why do they not heed the warning of Habakkuk 2:12: "Woe to him that buildeth a town with blood, and stablisheth a city by iniquity!" Also, "Thou shalt not oppress the stranger." (Ex. 23:9.) By what law or right do the Jews violate these Biblical commands? Why do they oppress the Palestinian people? Is this not just another historical instance of making war in God’s name – this time by the Jews?

I say that this cannot be of God, because the entire history of Zionism is one of bloodshed, deceit, and treachery, with the Jews using their unique and timeless excuse of past "persecution" to justify their current occupation. The Balfour Declaration, by which the British Government conspired with house of Rothschild to establish a Jewish State in Palestine, set forth in very clear language, that the rights of the Palestinian people would not be violated in the process of establishing the Jewish State. Here is the text of that document, with this critical promise emphasized:

Have the Jews kept this promise -- ever? On the contrary, the Zionist State began by violating the civil and religious rights of the Palestinian people, and this ongoing injustice continues to this day.

Shouldn’t the alleged "people of God" keep their promises? Shouldn’t "God’s chosen people" obey His Laws? The fact is that the Jewish people DO NOT obey the laws of Moses. {Anyone doubts this statement, please refer to my e-book, 95 Theses Against the Anti-Christ, which is available at this link: http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/95-theses.php This document lists the hundreds of ways in which Judaism violates the laws of Moses.} If the Jews had obeyed God’s laws and kept their promises, then the bloodshed that we see in the Middle East today could have been prevented. Wouldn’t you expect "God’s chosen people" to keep their promises? The reason they do not keep their promises is the simple fact that they are NOT God’s chosen people.

As you will amply discover: The Bible is NOT a Jewish book. That is a historical lie; and the full implications of this historical lie will be fully dealt with herein.

Ironically, the "Christians" who support Zionism are most often those who refer to themselves as "New Testament Christians," who deny the validity of the Old Testament, and many of them even go so far as to preach that the "law has been abolished," so that they "live by faith" instead of the Law. Perhaps this is why they blithely look the other way when the Zionists commit shock and awe, murder and mayhem, while pulverizing and destroying the homes of their displaced neighbors. Using KGB tactics, the Israelis routinely bulldoze the homes of Palestinians in the middle of the night, without warning, while the occupants scramble to get out of their homes that are being demolished before their eyes! It is a testament to the brilliant success of the Jewish media and their pulpit-driven brainwashing techniques that this brutal, cold-hearted propaganda goes by the name of "Christian" Zionism.

The obvious moral problem is that the Jews themselves claim to be the custodians of the Law of Moses. As such, they SHOULD be held accountable, because the Jews DO NOT teach that the law has been abolished. Rather, they practice their own, carefully contrived version of "the tradition of Moses," formulated over the centuries by the rabbis, by which they hold themselves blameless – above the Law, in fact -- in their dealings with non-Jews. This "law" is known as the Talmud; and it is the Talmud, not the Bible, which enables Judaism. Now tell me, which group, the Jews or the Judeo-Christians, practices the greater hypocrisy?

If the Judeo-Christians minimize or entirely negate the Old Testament, then on what grounds do they credit the Jews as being the "people of the Book"? If the Old Testament is irrelevant, then why should the Jewish claim of being "G-d’s chosen people" be of any relevance or significance to "New Testament Christians"? Why make this one exception in favor of the Jews – as if they were a relic from Old Testament times -- simply because they claim to be the descendants of Abraham, to whom this blessing was originally given? (Gen. 12:3.) If the Old Testament is irrelevant, THEN SO IS Gen. 12:3!!! Is the Old Testament relevant to true Christians? Consider some of the remarks that Jesus made concerning the Old Testament (John 5:46; 7:19-21; Matt. 4:4; Luke 2:2; 4:14-17; 24:24; Mark 12:26).

These One Testament "Christians" shouldn’t even be concerned with Jewish claims, if their beliefs were consistent! But Judeo-Christianity is just as self-contradictory as Judaism. They actually violate their own theology when they defer to the Jews, who, according to this Dispensationalist doctrine, lost their status as True Israel when they rejected the Messiah. Both religions have self-serving philosophies that cherry pick certain verses of the Bible that conform to their particular brand of theology, while totally ignoring the vast number of verses that contradict their pick-and-choose methodology. I guess one hypocrite deserves another!

God is not the author of confusion; but modern religion sure is.

Of course, this theological confusion is the fulfillment of God’s promise that He would send these hypocrites a "strong delusion" during the end times. (Isa. 66:4.) Paul confirms this delusion in his writings as well. (2 Thes. 2:11.) Were these New Testament Christians able to comprehend Scripture, they would find that Paul teaches the exact opposite of what they claim he teaches. {For a detailed discussion of how the modern Judeo-Christians have distorted the words of Paul, please follow this link, http://www.israelect.com/reference/ArnoldKennedy/ and click on the article "All, Every, Whomsoever," by Arnold Kennedy.} The fact is that Paul is an EXCLUSIVIST ISRAELITE, of the Tribe of Benjamin (Phil. 3:5), whose words have been butchered and mutilated by Christian Pharisees, whose ignorance of the original Hebrew and Greek languages is so profound that I can say, without reservation or fear of refutation, that modern Judeo-Christianity has become the False Prophet of the Book of Revelation. (Rev. 19:20.)

These Christian Pharisees teach that Paul says non-Israelites can be either "adopted" as "spiritual Israelites" or "grafted into" Israel by "conversion." The Bible teaches no such thing! Pay attention here to what Paul is actually saying (Just try to read and focus on the actual words, without reading anything "spiritual" into them!):

"For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, MY KINSMEN ACCORDING TO THE FLESH: [Paul is obviously NOT speaking of "all humanity"! Now, pay attention, folks!] who are Israelites, TO WHOM PERTAINETH THE ADOPTION, AND THE GLORY, AND THE COVENANTS, AND THE GIVING OF THE LAW, AND THE SERVICE OF GOD, AND THE PROMISES." (Romans 9:3-4.)

Only by universalizing the obviously Israelite context of this passage can Paul be misconstrued! To whom does Paul say the adoption pertains? ISRAELITES! Does Paul say anything about non-Israelites being adopted here? NO. He does not. Nor does he make such a claim anywhere else.

{Neither does the Greek word huiothesia (5206) specifically mean "adoption." Rather, it is the position of a son. While in conjunction with other words, it may be used to describe the placing of a son for adoption, another Greek word, eispoieisis, which is not used in the New Testament, was used by the Greeks to denote "adoption." The Israelites, being pure descendants of Adam, are already children of God, i.e., Luke 3:38, Deut. 14:1, Psa. 82:6. The dispersed Israelites, while they had temporarily lost their position as the children of God, which was to be regained through the Gospel, were nevertheless still considered to be children, i.e., Isa. 43:6, 45:11 [contrast 61:5], and especially John 11:52.}

The Greek word huiothesia actually means, in its verb form, "to place or ordain." Hence, a better translation in this context would be "placement," thus signifying that the Israelites will eventually be established or restored to their position as the heirs of the Kingdom. Substituting the word adoption for the more specific placement opens the translation up to a universalistic interpretation, where none is intended. As you will see throughout this document, the word-butchers have done a masterful job of tampering with the words of Paul! Obviously, there is a big difference between "to put in place" versus "to place for adoption." The latter clearly adds a meaning that is not contained the original Greek.

Modern Judeo-Christianity has become victimized by two gigantic misconceptions/delusions:

1. The belief that the Jews are Israel, and
2. That non-Israelites (all races, ethnicities, cultures, and religions) can become part of the family of Israel, thereby having claim to a share of "salvation."

We in Christian Identity have been attempting to explain why these two non-Scriptural propositions are absolutely false, and, furthermore, that these two Scriptural deviations are the main cause of the confusion and turmoil that exist in the world today. There are millions of well-meaning Christians who believe these lies and direct their lives accordingly. It is our job – No! It is our duty! -- in Christian Identity, to explain to them, with all of the due respect that we can muster, that they, individually and collectively, have been deceived in a most clever way. It is the purpose of this book to explain how this deception has been accomplished.

But first, in contrast to these two beliefs, Christian Identity teaches that,

1.) The Jewish people are NOT Israel, and

Jesus Christ came to REDEEM Israel from the sins of the fathers. That redemption was accomplished by His First Advent, particularly by His Sacrifice on the Cross. "Salvation" is another matter entirely, as it involves the establishment of the Kingdom right here on earth, at the Second Advent; and it is NOT related to any post-mortem trip to "heaven," as most Christians falsely believe. I am not disputing the concept of the afterlife. What I am saying is that it is not necessary to physically die before going to "heaven." Jesus speaks of eternal life. Paul speaks of immortality coming upon us while we are here in the flesh. We will be changed "in an instant." (I Cor. 15:52.) The Book of Revelation clearly describes the Holy City descending down to earth. (Rev. 21:2.) With this event, when the Kingdom comes, death itself will be vanquished.

I am often asked the question, "Which is the best version of the Bible for Identity believers?" To this question, I have always replied: "All ancient and modern translations suffer from two main problems: Jewish tampering and Roman Catholic meddling." Catholicism has always been a universalist doctrine; and this policy of universalism began to be established, "ordained" by the translations of Jerome and institutionalized by his successors. Even before Jerome, the teachings of Paul were butchered by an enthusiastic religious zealot and self-promoter named Simon Magus, a universalist deceiver if there ever was one! In short, the writings of Paul have been misrepresented by many agents, all of whom were working either for themselves or for the Anti-Christ. It is, in fact, fair to say that all of these universalistic doctrines are outright invention, complete fabrication by the translators, who, by a process of editing by translation, have made the Word of God of none effect. These Catholic doctrines are not contained in the original autographs of either the Hebrew prophets or the Christian disciples.

It has been stated by many commentators that Paul "reinvented" Christianity. I submit that this statement is absolutely false. It was, in fact, his translators, false interpreters and false promoters, who reinvented Christianity. And, if Christianity was REINVENTED, then it behooves us to understand why, how and what it was that was reinvented!!! If the original writings are not understood, then the REINVENTION cannot be understood either.

While the early Catholics were busy reinventing the New Testament, the Jews were busy reinventing the Old Testament. The Jewish scribes who began that process were the Masoretes, who produced an edited Hebrew version of the Old Testament, the Masoretic Text, which, unfortunately, became the basis of the King James translation of the Old Testament.

Between these two diabolical sources (Jewish and Catholic), they have infected Scripture with their distortions, license, mistranslations, additions, subtractions, and outright invention. By virtue of this assumed authority over Scripture, the Bible has become a mumble and jumble of perplexing, often contradictory terms and doctrines, that have no legitimate basis or conception in the original Hebrew and Greek languages. By redefining words and by inventing "history" that never happened, Catholicism and Judaism have created false contexts for Scripture. Add to this malaise the fanciful, modernist misinterpretations of Evangelical Christianity, and – Voila! – we have discovered the Great Apostasy, which was also prophesied by Paul in 2 Thes. 2:3. Of course, none of these misguided groups will ever admit that they are preaching apostasy; but they most assuredly are, for they totally misrepresent what Paul said in Romans 9:3-4 (just quoted above, p. 4), and just about everywhere else in the New Testament. In that passage, Paul clearly teaches that the Ordination/Placement/"Adoption," the Covenants, the Giving of the Mosaic Law, and the GLORY are given to flesh and blood Israelites. No other people are mentioned. As will be demonstrated later, True Israel’s commission is to set a national example for the heathen nations. This national message has been distorted into the "Gospel of Personal Salvation," with its focus on "evangelizing" individuals of all races.

Both the rabbinate and the Roman Catholic Church have responded enthusiastically to the call of the universalistic agenda. And both have been motivated by rigid dogma coupled with this agenda. It goes without saying that neither priesthood encourages questions or criticism. Rather than deal in open discussion, both religions have practiced excommunication of critics. In the case of Judaism, the double standard of Jewish religio-cultural exclusivism for themselves is contrasted with the doctrine of multiculturalism for the non-Jewish masses. While actively promoting this multiculturalsim for everyone else, the Jews have declared themselves to be EXEMPT from the very amalgamation that they wish to force upon others! According to them, everything else, including your culture and mine, is subject to change and, furthermore, needs to be changed according to Jewish "values," while Jewish religion and culture must be preserved for eternity! Now, isn’t that just a bit self-serving? Yet, few Catholics or Protestants dare to criticize this self-serving theology! "For fear of the Jews!" (Esther 8:17; John 7:13, 9:22, 19:38, 20:19.)

Few scholars have ever bothered to analyze or appreciate this double standard. It was with purpose and intent that this double standard was built into the "Chosen People" philosophy, as practiced by the Jews. It is, in fact, hypocrisy personified in the rabbis. "Beware the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy." (Luke 12:1.) But Christian Zionists pay no heed to this Scriptural statement, and the many other statements throughout the New Testament, which condemn Judaism (the religion of the Pharisees) as the religion of the Synagogue of Satan. (Rev. 2:9, 3:9.) Following the lead of their various denominations, the Judeo-Christians typically refuse to acknowledge Bible verses that contradict the rigid dogma that has been so cynically and masterfully fed to them.

In its heyday, Popery practiced a similar double standard, using a well-educated priesthood to manipulate an illiterate and superstitious populace. In both cases, the priesthood exploited and still exploits the people by inventing doctrine that is not found in Scripture.

Unfortunately, the priesthoods of modern Protestantism have borrowed very liberally from both of these false traditions. The Fundamentalists and Evangelicals rival the rabbis and the Catholic theologians with their wholesale invention of doctrine, plus their far-fetched, modernistic interpretations of Scripture, with equally disastrous results. The "Rapture Theory" and "Once saved, always saved" doctrines are two examples. Another is the "God loves everyone" doctrine. I would ask these same people, "Does God love Satan?" Or does God intend to make an END of Satan? The Bible teaches the latter, not the former. If God "loves everyone," would someone please explain these verses to me: Mal. 4:1; Matt. 15:13-14; Luke 12:51, 19:27; John 17:9; 2 Peter 3:7; 1 John 2:15?

Thanks to these three priesthoods (Roman Catholicism, Judaism, and modern Protestantism…the three "unclean spirits" of Revelation 16:13?), the Bible has been turned up-side-down, from a record of the exploits and promises Yahweh made exclusively to His People, Israel, into a self-serving, priesthood-empowering manual for people control, a template for religious tyranny. The pew occupants are none the wiser, mistaking this iniquity for the "will of God." The sheep eat the sweetened poison that the "shepherds" feed them, and they revel in their ignorance. Believing themselves to be spiritual, righteous, and wise, they hypnotically return every "Sabbath" for more religious entertainment.

Given the liberal flow of nonsense coming from the rabbis and pulpitmasters, the pew occupants have become nothing more than lobotomized flotsam floating around on an ocean of hogwash, drifting along with the latest trends.

"Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying I am Christ; and the time draweth near; go ye not therefore after them." (Luke 21:8.)

My introduction to priestly hypocrisy came during the Second Vatican Council. As a mere lad of 17, I was a very idealistic Catholic, believing very strongly in the principles of morality as historically taught by the Catholic Church. That all changed in 1963, when Vatican II swept the "eternal truths" of the Catholic Faith aside. In the place of the old, long-established "eternal truths" was a new set of "eternal truths," many of which contradicted the old "eternal truths." Unable to stomach the hypocrisy of it all, I left the Catholic Church and never looked back. It wasn’t until 1978 that I discovered a worthy replacement: Christian Identity. That limbo of 15 years took place during the Swinging Sixties and the Indulgent Seventies, an era of liberal changes with which I was not comfortable, even though I may have indulged in some of its guilty pleasures. As I was looking for Truth, not Entertainment, the "sex, drugs, and rock & roll" culture that I grew up in never appealed to me, despite its ubiquity.

Giving credit where it is due, my Catholic upbringing did stress the Ten Commandments, although the Catholic version deletes the Commandment against idolatry!

My assessment of the Catholic Church proved to be correct, as the Church did little or nothing, aside from lip service, to stem the tide of liberalism. In fact, after Vatican II, the Church was instrumental in institutionalizing liberalism against conservative values. Although maintaining a consistent stance on the subject of abortion, the Church abandoned its anti-communist position and its ages-old stance against Judaism and Freemasonry. The homosexual/pedophile crisis in today’s church is but one symptom of Catholicism’s inner sickness and turmoil. Far too many Catholics look the other way or make excuses, rather than demand truth and accountability from their so-called "spiritual leaders." Such sheep get the pastors they deserve.

In the middle of my personal limbo period, I did a tour in Vietnam, surviving a year of hell, fighting against a largely unseen enemy, in a war that was not designed to be won. Instead, I saw very clearly that this war was making BIG BUCKS for BIG CORPORATIONS while BIG GOVERNMENT was taking control over what was previously the private sector. It was painfully obvious to me then – and also to most other true conservatives – that the Government, under Lyndon Baines Johnson, was using the Vietnam War as a cover/subterfuge/distraction for the direct implementation of far-reaching socialistic intrusions into our private lives. While we were supposedly fighting communism on the battlefield, the Welfare State and liberalism were the big winners of the Vietnam War. Do you see the irony?

Our military strategy was to capture objectives in the field, only to abandon them shortly thereafter and allow the Viet Cong to retake those objectives without a fight. When I confronted my commanding officer about this stupid policy, I became ostracized within my own outfit. I told him, the company, and the battalion that I refuse to fight with an organization that is not committed to winning. At no point during the Vietnam War was there any attempt to establish a front and secure the territory behind this front. (As I was to find out later, General MacArthur had the same problem during the Korean War.) Instead, the enemy was allowed constant inroads into whatever territory we possessed. How many times should a soldier be asked to recapture the same hill? The expression, "no-win war," was commonly used by those of us who saw that the war effort was not sincere. I had developed the opinion that the War was being deliberately prolonged by corporate interests in order to reap maximum profits from supplying the War; and the federal government enabled this policy.

Even before returning from Vietnam in 1970, I promised myself that I would find out just who the war profiteers were. This path took me, first, to the hard money school of economics, starting with Harry Browne, Peter Cook, Frederic Bastiat, Ludwig von Mises, and other "rogue" economists, who taught that fiat money was the bane of civilization, the true cause of inflation and the true cause of most wars, and that bankers were the true war profiteers and the most influential warmongers. Few people see war in this light. I am not aware of any college course entitled, Economics of War, 101. For a real education, everyone should read General Smedley Butler’s War Is a Racket. This book should be the main college textbook, demonstrating how wars are arranged by international financiers and fought for the specific purpose of making profits for international corporations. But you will never see such a course offered in any university curriculum. Since many of these "institutions of higher learning" depend on corporate handouts (i.e., "philanthropy") and state funds, both of which are controlled by Jewish agents, the funding of these institutions would quickly be cut off if they ever taught the truth about the financing of war. Academia rigorously pursues the theme that wars are fought over conflicting ideologies or over clashing religions, while the economic facts of warfare are systematically minimized or excluded.

In this way, college students are given "facts" while they remain ignorant of true history!

Most people believe that wars are fought over conflicting ideologies. I would point out that an ideology never financed a war. Bankers finance wars. In particular, the Rothschild banking family has financed more wars than any other. From this understanding, the forbidden subject of secret societies and clandestine operations drew me ever deeper into the fact that rich and powerful men rule from behind the scenes and that most politicians in the limelight are nothing more than puppets and actors being manipulated by the "hidden hand." I could see very clearly that the main business of modern politics is disguising treason as patriotism. It was a very depressing realization.

A major revelation for me was Joe McCarthy’s book, America’s Retreat From Victory, which vividly demonstrated the ruthless pursuit of treason for profit undertaken by our so-called leaders. This suppressed book thoroughly documents how Franklin D. Roosevelt, General "Vinegar" Joe Stilwell, and General George C. Marshall sabotaged Chiang Kai-Shek’s Free China by diverting resources, including military supplies, to Mao Tse Tung. The inescapable conclusion of McCarthy’s book is that Red China was deliberately created by the Roosevelt Administration. As incredible as this statement sounds, anyone with a brain understands that the real victor of WWII was communism, as Roosevelt and Churchill inexplicably, without any military necessity, and without consulting their respective legislatures, handed whole nations over to Stalin, even though Stalin’s army could not function without the Lend-Lease program. Such treachery is mind-boggling. Who would conceive of such treachery? For daring to expose this Zionist treachery, "Tailgunner Joe" is still demonized to this day.

General Patton, realizing that High Treason was at work, exclaimed, "We slaughtered the wrong pig!" Instead of destroying Germany, we should have destroyed the Soviet Union; but powerful men, otherwise known as "capitalists," were working feverishly behind the scenes to ensure that communism would command the world stage. Thus, the so-called "Cold War" was nothing but a facade behind which Treason worked to expend America’s resources until America could be debauched by Zionism. While the American people were distracted by the Korean war, the phony "nuclear threat" posed by the Soviet Union, and the Vietnam War, the destruction of White Christian society in America proceeded at full tilt from the High Priesthood of International Finance at the Federal Reserve.

When President John F. Kennedy issued Executive Order # 11110, which was designed to restore America to Constitutional money, as Lincoln’s Greenbacks had done, Kennedy had signed his own death warrant. That Executive Order resulted in his execution by the International Banking Mafia, the House of Rothschild, of London, England. {See this article for more info: http://www.rense.com/general76/jfkvs.htm }

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the reality is that all of the wars between "capitalism" and "communism" have been staged by a Chosen Few. This is MYSTERY BABYLON, the "Empire of Merchants," the 8^th Beast of the Book of Revelation, Chapter 17, with whom all of the war-profiteers and "kings of the earth have committed fornication." (Rev. 17:2.)

These powerful men, almost all of them Jewish bankers and corporate executives, such as Armand Hammer of Occidental Petroleum, allied with the House of Rothschild, had surreptitiously financed the Soviet Union from its very inception. Why would Jewish bankers finance communism? Because communism has always been financed by Jews since the French Revolution and because they have a Satanic hatred for Christian civilization; and they make millions by financing wars while slaughtering millions of Christians at the same time. As the saying goes, "War is the Jews’ harvest." It was these same banksters that had backed Roosevelt/Rosenfeldt throughout his entire political career, the same Rosenfeldt who un-Constitutionally confiscated the gold of the American people on behalf of his Zionist bankster buddies in London and in the Federal Reserve Corporation. Federal Dictator Rosenfeldt was their Orwellian Big Brother. {For a thorough treatment of Roosevelt’s Jewish-Communist-Zionist roots and connections, please go to this link: http://www.ety.com/HRP/rev/fdr.htm . You will see him as the Kosher Press has never dared to present him.}

Whenever the international bankers want a war, they first choose a suitable bogeyman: the Czar of Russia, Adolf Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Ahmedinejad of Iran, etc. Then the bogeyman is demonized by the hoards of yellow journalists under their employment. These "respected journalists" have surnames, such as Huntley, Brinkley, Cronkite, Rather and Walters. Any dirt, whether real or imagined, that these media whores can "dig up" or manufacture about the new "threat to humanity" will be turned into headlines. Then he is GLOBALLY declared "anti-democratic" or "anti-Semitic" by the Kosher press. The Jewish media pundits never fail to tell us what we should believe! Then, the sabre-rattling and the war propaganda begins. "Freedom" and "democracy" are declared to be under attack by the bogeyman, who is often just an egotistical pipsqueak whose nation cannot realistically threaten America or the world. "National defense" and "patriotism" are invoked, the nation’s youth are called upon and shamed into enlisting in the war effort. Thus, the average citizen sheeple, convinced of the "threat" by the rising rhetoric of war, are terrified of the new demon, and are, yet again, sucked into another war…another no win war. Next, the government orders war material and troop training while the talking heads inflame the people. The corporations drool at the prospect of enormous, usually obscene war profits, and the warships are launched.

This is exactly how the Jewish Neo-Cons engineered the Iraq War, using their puppet, George W. Bush. Tell me we are not living in a NEW DARK AGE… the Dark Age of Zionism.

By 1975, the presence of the Hidden Hand, as many authors commonly refer to the Secret Power Behind the Scenes, had become very obvious to me. Zionism, the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, the National Council of Churches, etc., were well-organized and financed organs, assiduously working for the establishment of a World Government, with the true Directorate being the House of Rothschild banking dynasty in London. The UN, another Rothschild enterprise, was, of course, the bane of true conservatives. But few critics of the UN have dared to point out that its true origin is in the House of Rothschild. More and more Jewish names began to surface: names of spies, communists, war profiteers, and unelected advisors to disastrous administrations (Col. Edward Mandel House for Woodrow Wilson, Bernard Baruch for FDR , Henry Kissinger for Nixon, Ford and Carter), and, of course, international bankers, those Jews who violate the Bible’s clear commandments against usury! For a while, I joined the John Birch Society, but I found that discussing the Jewish question at their meetings was verboten. I smelled a rat! A big rat!

The name of the rat is Judaism.

I saw very clearly that the two major political parties, the Demo-rats and Republicrats, were both tools of the Israeli Lobby. Few politicians dared to say this out loud, "for fear of the Jews." The one politician who breeched this silence of the lambs, Governor George Wallace of Alabama, said, "There’s not a nickel’s worth of difference between the Republicans and the Democrats." He paid for his chutzpah by taking a bullet. There’s even less difference between these two parties today, as Cindy Sheehan has recently discovered. Here is the difference between the two parties: The Democrats are Zionists who exploit left-wing rhetoric and the Republicans are Zionists who exploit conservative rhetoric. They are Zionist Left and Zionist Right. That is the only difference.

After reading Sheldon Emry’s "Billions For the Bankers, Debts For the People," I knew I had finally been pointed in the right direction! Here was the TRUTH, plain and simple!!!! I had found the true Faith: Christian Identity. I could see that this was the only religion or philosophy, for that matter, that perceived political and religious reality as it was! After a long, frustrating search, I had finally found my kinsmen!!! The Prodigal Son (Me!) had returned to Christ, the Messiah who was prophesied in the Old Testament and who was realized in the New, having come in the flesh as the Kinsman Redeemer of His People, Israel. And He was NOT a Jew! He was a Judahite! BIG DIFFERENCE! Happy, Happy! Joy, Joy! At last, the Bible was beginning to make sense!!! It has been a rocky, thrilling and mind-blowing ride.

In trying to understand Scripture, the biggest problem I had with conventional theology was the failure to reconcile the fact that "God’s Chosen People" refused to recognize Jesus Christ as the Messiah. If He was one of "their people," then why did they hate Him so much? Why did they crucify Him? Something didn’t add up. More hypocrisy! If anything drives young people out of Christianity, it is the fact that such contradictions are presented as unquestionable dogma. When a teacher cannot answer a legitimate question, the student loses respect for that teacher. While the megachurches flourish because of their simplistic theology and the media hype, traditional neighborhood churches shrivel up and die, along with their elderly clientele. This trend parallels that of business, as huge corporations take the place of mom-and-pop stores. Mr. Roger’s neighborhood has become a Disney theme park…with plenty of room for homosexuals!!!

Immediately after returning from Vietnam in 1972, I took advantage of the G.I. Bill and enrolled in college, majoring in Philosophy, with my main focus being Comparative Religion. I attempted to read the Bible, but it was all a blur: too much information with no cohesive plot. Nor could I accept the premise that the race of bankers, merchants, warmongers and Christ-haters known as Jews were the kinsmen of Jesus. This made absolutely no sense. Yet, I instinctively knew that the Bible must be correct, for I was very much attracted to the Jesus of the New Testament. I sensed that the translations were defective. It was the Judeo-Christian version of the Bible that needed clarification. There was something wrong with this interpretation and with the cast of characters. On top of that, orthodox religion contradicts the archeological record, especially with regard to the teaching of a global Flood, three races "evolving" from Noah and his wife, the elimination of the Sacred Name, YHWH from the translations, etc. There had to be a solution to these problems!

I came to hear of Christian Identity through reading the books of the pyramidologists. Pyramidology is the study of the science and theology of the pyramids, especially the Great Pyramid of Cheops. It turned out that most of these authors were of the British Israel persuasion. Studying British Israel began to clear things up, but I could never accept their claim that the race-mixed Jewish people were regarded as being one and the same as the genealogically segregated tribe of Judah. There was something that the history books were leaving out; and I was determined to find out what it was. Also, there was this constant, nagging question: Why would one tribe out the Twelve overwhelmingly reject the Messiah? Why would His own Tribe be so hostile to His offer of Redemption – and to remain so for 2,000 years afterwards? This theology made absolutely no sense! It was too much to believe.

Eventually, I discovered the works of American Israel (Christian Identity), especially the Two-Seedliners, such as Bertrand Comparet, Dr. Wesley Swift, Dan Gayman, William Gale, Thomas E. O’Brien, William Fowler, WG Findlay (a South African), WN Saxon, Nord Davis, Jr., Willie Martin, Clifton Emahiser, and many more. These authors explained how Judaism was a pretense, an impersonation of Israel by the descendants of Esau, who are the Jews of today. Finally, the Bible began to make sense!!! British Israel is terribly wrong on this point, that some or all of the Jews belong to the Tribe of Judah. The fact is that the Jews are unrelated to the Tribe of Judah. British Israel, like the rest of Judeo-Christianity, have fallen for a very clever deception. Since the modern Jewish people are comprised of 95% NON-SHEMITIC Ashkenazi stock and only 5% PARITALLY-SEMITIC Sephardic stock, there is NO WAY that Edomites and Khazars, nor their mixed breed children, can be considered as the lineal or even cultural descendants of the children of Israel. Mixing blood and seed is a direct violation of Deut. 23:2 and hundreds of other scriptures that declare that the children of Israel must remain pure and separate from all surrounding nations. Take your blinders off, BI!!!

Here is the gist of Christian Identity: Jesus was NOT a Jew! The Jews are NOT Israel! And most important of all, the Bible prophesied that the Israelites would forget their Identity as Israel. (Isa. 29:10-12; 42:16, 19-20; Hos. 1:9-10; 2:7-19; Romans 11:7,8,25.) This mark the Jews have never fit, for they have had an unbroken record of claiming to be Israel, going all the way back to Palestine. So, if someone forgot his identity, it was not the Jew!!! Slowly but surely, I began to amass a mountain of evidence against the impostor. In 1980, I began work on my first book, The Great Impersonation: How the Anti-Christ Has Deceived the Whole World, a book which documents the historical, Scriptural, cultural, ethnic, religious and racial distinctions between Israelites and Jews. {A copy of this book can be purchased online at this link: http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/support.php } By 2003, after twenty-two years of continuous research and writing about the separate histories, identities, theologies and destinies of Israelites and Jews, I had become a homegrown expert on the language of the Bible. This was not my intention when I undertook to write this book; but this was one of the obvious, inescapable effects. Being now intimately familiar with the differences between Israelites and Jews, I could clearly see which Biblical words were causing total, global confusion. Various Hebrew and Greek words were either badly translated, deliberately misused, or just plain botched up.

By understanding how Judaism deliberately obscures and abuses language, I had learned how the rabbis were able to deceive the entire world.

Consider the difference between the following two translations of the same Hebrew Scripture, Isaiah 52:6:

1.) My race shall acknowledge my power on the day when I come and exclaim, ‘Here I am.’ -- Ferrar Fenton.

2.) Therefore my people shall know my name: therefore they shall know in that day that I am he that doth speak: behold, it is I. -- King James Version.

Two things clearly stand out from these different translations: a) The King James is a very awkward, ponderous, and clumsy translation compared to Ferrar Fenton’s. b) Fenton’s use of the word race in place of people. Is this usage justified? Not only is it justified, it is right on target. This usage captures the racial consciousness of separatism that prevailed in the continuous culture that produced the original Hebrew and Greek Testaments. Therefore, Fenton’s use of the word race is both semantically legitimate and infinitely more precise than the word people.

Anyone who has ever translated from one language to another knows how difficult it is to capture the essence of meaning by using equivalent words in the object language. It is almost impossible to translate anything without extensive footnotes and explanations of double meanings and nuances of meaning, plus idiomatic usages that will exist in one language and not in another. The best translator is one who is both fluent in both the spoken and written versions of the two languages involved in the translation. He must also be familiar with dialects and with the respective histories of the two languages, if he is to do justice to the translation. As such, a translator has to make decisions, which will either add meaning to or lose meaning from the original language. Thus, every translator is also an editor, whether he realizes it or not. It is incumbent upon the translator that he must always endeavor to provide the best possible answer to the question, "What is the author’s intended meaning?"

In 1611, there was little distinction between "my race" and "my people," because it was understood, as a cultural given, that the races should not mix. Because of softening attitudes toward race-mixing today, fueled by relentless Jewish media overexposure since the 1960s, "my people" no longer conveys the separateness that "my race" does. In fact, the word race has become a dirty, four-letter word. Think about who is responsible for this remarkable change in our culture!!! It has come from the Matrix of Deception: Judaism and Judeo-Chrstianity!

None of the Christian missionaries who ventured into darkest Africa went there with the slightest intention of mixing the races. Even the most liberal critics and commentators will tell you that their intention was to subjugate, not mix. "Conversion by the sword," blah, blah, blah… The fact is that the present-day "Christian" doctrine that condones race-mixing and idolizes "priests" of other races is only about one generation old. It is a modernist heresy. Hence, Ferrar Fenton’s translation is the more accurate of the two, because it reflects the racial consciousness of the Hebrew authors and also that of the King James translators. It is a historical fact that the propaganda campaign of the amalgamation of the races began in the 1960’s, with the televangelists and the Civil Rights movement. Before then, race-mixing was a universal taboo. Those of us who have lived through this period can see how well this Jewish propaganda campaign has worked.

The answer to the earlier question about which is the best modern translation is this: none of them! They all share, to one extent or another, the same, serious defects, resulting from the uncritical acceptance of faulty definitions and usages of words, words that the rabbis of Judaism have either redefined or invented for their own deceptive purposes. Since finishing the Great Impersonation, I have made it my life’s work to inform White Christians of the Scriptural fraud that has been perpetuated for the past 2,150 years.

In this ages-old conflict between Esau (the Jews) and Jacob (True Israel, the Caucasian People), the evil brother concocted an ingenious plan to take advantage of his good brother’s misfortune. Part of that plan was to distort the good brother’s past, so that Jacob’s amnesia would be exacerbated by falsified documents, one of those documents being the Bible itself. Many of Jacob’s modern Christian brothers would swallow this bait and drown themselves with it. They now think of themselves as "Gentiles," and they believe that the Jews are Israelites. The cesspool they are drowning in is called Judeo-Christianity. Satan’s favorite slogan is "Bless the Jews and God will bless you." This is the mantra of Zionism, a semi-secret club which consists of the world’s richest and most influential Jews; and those duped Christians who have been misled by this mantra are witnessing and contributing to the daily decline of Christian civilization, a decline that has been orchestrated by the very oppressor(s) they bless! As such, they are actually the Black Sheep thinking themselves wise and "saved." It has been said that "pride comes before a fall." What greater pride can there be, than claiming to be "saved" without having to obey God’s moral Law?

Somehow, these deluded Christians must be taught to see that Zionism is a noose around their necks, and the more they support Zionism, the tighter the noose gets.

As someone once said, "The first casualty of war is the truth." And the first soldier to engage the enemy is the editor. The following discussion involves words and their true meaning. We will demonstrate how particular words have been deceptively used, with their meanings changed, twisted, distorted, substituted or dropped altogether, so as to impose a Pharisaic worldview upon the masses, Jew, Christian, Muslim and atheist alike. This discussion of Biblical language should go a long way towards explaining how the anti-Christ operates. This document will provide you with a detailed understanding of how the rabbis of Judaism think and operate. You will get a glimpse inside the mind of Lucifer.

I have decided to list the following Arsenal of Words, critically important words, which appear in the Bible. The true meanings of these words will demonstrate that the Bible tells a story which is quite different from what today’s deluded masses believe. Possessing the ORIGINAL meanings of these words, from the Hebrew and the Greek, you will get a completely different perspective of the authors. I can only hope that this new perspective will positively impact yourself, your family and friends, for Our Savior said, "Ye shall know the Truth, and the Truth shall set you free." (John 8:32.) I also pray that reading this document will bring you closer to your Creator.

It is due to the twin heresies known as Judaism and Judeo-Christianity that the Bible appears to be about the Jewish people. This is the GREAT DECEPTION spoken of at Rev. 12:9, because the Bible is not about the Jews at all. Nothing could be further from the truth. The pre-eminent point of this essay is to document and expose how critically important words have been subtly redefined and deliberately mistranslated so as to create the impression that the Jews are the protagonists of the Book. The reason that so few people are able to see through this charade is because this impersonation has been going on for 2,000 years. As a direct result, modern Judeo-Christianity has blindly and uncritically accepted any proposition the rabbis of Judaism have conjured up.

I here and now state, categorically, that the Jews ARE NOT the Israel of the Bible. Judaism is a culture based on IDENTITY THEFT; and these thieves have been getting away with this Great Impersonation for two thousand years. The Bible is about the Adamic (genetically White) people known today, collectively, as the Twelve Tribes of Israel. Once the mythology of this false religion is exposed, stripped away, and examined in the light of truth and reason, you will understand that the Jews are not Israel at all, but an IMPOSTOR, "the beast that deceiveth the whole world." (Rev. 12:9.)

Hence, the first word that we will study is the word,

This is, by far, the most misunderstood, abused and misused word in the Bible. The rabbis of Judaism and the theologians of Judeo-Christianity have led us to believe that this word is the equivalent of Israel. But these two words are, in fact, antithetical, because the Jewish people have no Israelite heritage whatsoever. Their Biblical heritage is, in fact, of Canaanite and Edomite origin. Anyone who has studied the Bible will know that the Canaanites and Edomites were/are Israel’s most bitter enemies.

How did Israel’s enemies come to be known as Israel?

In the Old Testament, the word Jew is ALWAYS derived from the Hebrew Judah (Strong’s #3064, Yehudi). Look it up in any Concordance and see for yourself. The people of Judah were the racially exclusive people of the Tribe of Judah, just as the Asherites were the racially exclusive people of the Tribe of Asher, the Danites were the racially exclusive members of that Tribe, etc., etc. All of these tribes kept genealogical records of their marriages and offspring, so as to maintain their continuity as a pure, unmixed RACE. No other ethnic group has ever done this! Our ancestors have done this because Yahweh (which is the Hebrew name for God), commanded us to do this.

When the Bible says of Noah, that he was "perfect in his generations" (Gen. 6:9), it is telling us that he was unblemished in his DESCENT. That is, he was an Adamite who had no trace of non-White genetic material in his blood. The Hebrew word for perfect is tamiym, meaning "without blemish, complete, full, perfect, sincerely, sound, without spot, undefiled, upright, whole." The word tamiym modifies the word generations, which is translated from the Hebrew toledaw, which means, "birth, family, descent."

The false priests of Judaism and Judeo-Christianity will tell you that this means that Noah was a morally "unblemished" person, but that is not what the Bible says. Here is the entire passage, in proper context: "These are the DESCENDANTS ("generations") OF NOAH: Noah was a just man and perfect [unblemished, unmixed, unadulterated] in his DESCENT [not behavior], and Noah walked with God." This, if you will, is the BIBLICALLY CORRECT translation of this verse. The typical, Judeo-Christian interpretation would have us believe that "perfect" means "moral." But the verse would be repeating itself, for it already tells us that Noah was a "just" man.

The orthodox interpretation of this verse is nonsense, because the very next verse goes on to list Noah’s TOLEDAW (descendants) in a perfect, genealogical fashion, for that is what the context of these two verses is about. ("And Noah begat three sons…") The context is genealogical descent. Thus, Ham, Shem and Japheth were ALSO unblemished in their genealogy; and archeology has proven that their descendants were just as adamah (Hebrew for "rosy-cheeked" Whites) as Noah himself.

Contrast this language with the description of the mixed multitude: the offspring of the fallen ones and the "daughters of Adam" (awdawm, #120), who had produced race-mixed children, including giants, of which Goliath was a surviving, genetic example. This mixed progeny is described by the words, "for all flesh had corrupted itself." Flesh is translated from basar, which bears this meaning: "…flesh…body…person... pudenda…nakedness." This is talking about the corruption of literal FLESH. The latter two are references to the human sexual organs. Are you beginning to get the real meaning of these Hebrew words? If immorality is deduced from these passages, it is only because the immoral act of race-mixing was causing all flesh to become corrupted, blemished. Only the genome (DNA profile) of Noah and his immediate family was unblemished. The DNA of all of the other people, residing in the geographical location of Noah’s territory, was corrupted by this forbidden race-mixing. Yahweh designed the DNA of all races; and He intended all of the races to remain separate and distinct. In contrast, Judaism, the religion of the descendants of these same fallen angels, today promotes race-mixing, just as their fallen angel ancestors engaged in then.

Genesis 6 is describing how the fallen angels began raping and pillaging, creating the forbidden offspring of the fallen ones (Nephilim) and White (Adamic) women. (Gen. 6:4.) Yahweh judged the land for this sin then, and He is going to judge the whole planet again for this same violation of the Law on the Judgment Day, for race-mixing is forbidden by the Bible. Those who are actively promoting the Gospel of Race-Mixing are bringing Judgment upon their own heads. Among them, there will be a "wailing and a gnashing of teeth" (Matt. 13:50) when they find out how wrong their doctrine has been.

All theologians recognize the historical fact that the Israelites were a racially exclusive people, but they teach that this fact is no longer relevant, because THEIR INTERPRETATION of the New Covenant is that the "Church" has taken the place of literal Israel, which is now supposedly "Spiritual Israel." I can assure you that there is no such expression as Spiritual Israel in the Bible. This is a false doctrine, invented by the Christian Pharisees for the purpose of promoting their universalistic religion.

In fact, there is only one place in the whole Bible where these two words are used in the same sentence. Let’s take a look:

 8 The watchman of Ephraim was with my God: but the prophet is a snare of a fowler in all his ways, and hatred in the house of his God. (Hosea 9:6-8)

{The fact is that, in 2 Thes. 2, Paul was talking about the people in Judea and the conditions of his own time. While the Edomites have continued their charade since Paul’s time, and while there are many historical times that have paralleled Paul’s description, Paul was not prophesying of the future when he made his remarks. Rather, he merely observed and described a condition, which has persisted: that the adversary, the jews, are masquerading as the people of God on earth, even imagining themselves to be God.}

But since the universalists love to take Scripture out of its historical and racial context, what verse 7 is actually telling them, whether they like it or not, is that those Israelites who consider themselves "spiritual" will have gone MAD. They are fools, because of their great deviation from the Laws of Yahweh. Judaism is the theology that is directly responsible for re-introducing the latter-day heresy of race-mixing back into our culture. When the parasite infects the host, the host often goes into a state of delirium (madness), coupled with a high fever. The host is usually unable to explain the cause of the fever. This mad fever, that our society is presently going through, is called the Great Apostasy (the "falling away" of 2 Thes. 2:3), also referred to as the Great Delusion, the false belief that Jews are Israel and that "Spiritual Israel" has replaced literal Israel. The symptoms are exactly the same as in the days of Noah, with race-mixing and all other forms of sexual perversion running rampant.

Madness indeed! {For a full discussion of the Great Apostasy, please follow this link: http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/apostasyexcerpt.php .}

Verse 1 of Hosea 9 tells us this: "Rejoice NOT, O Israel, for joy, as other people: for thou hast gone AWHORING FROM THY GOD, thou hast loved a reward upon every corn floor."

Israel is thus depicted as a whore rolling around on the floor with forbidden lovers. The deluded Dispensationalists believe that other people can become like us, literal Israel. Thinking themselves to be wise, they teach that the inheritance was taken away from God’s chosen people, Anglo-Saxon Israel. But Yahweh Elohim has no intention of giving THE INHERITANCE to people of ANOTHER RACE!!!!!! He specifically created our DNA so that we would be a light unto the nations, not so that the other nations should amalgamate with us!! History has proven that, whenever we forget God’s commandments and socially intermingle with other races, we cease to be that light.

Just look how low we have sunk since segregation ended here in America in the 1960’s. Has life gotten better or worse? Has integration benefited YOU? Has integration benefited Blacks? The fact is that societal conditions have gotten progressively WORSE, even worse for the Blacks, who were far more productive, well-behaved, and prosperous while segregated in their own communities! Black family structure has literally been destroyed by the liberal Welfare State; but they keep on blaming us middle-class White folk for their failures!!! Their illegitimacy rate is 90%, and the great bulk of them are dependent upon the Welfare State. The true Conservatives of the 60’s and 70’s warned that this would be the outcome; but the fever of integration had to demonstrate its folly. Hurricane Katrina showed the world how the social engineering of the Welfare State has "benefited" Blacks, as Blacks looted, raped and terrorized the other victims of Katrina, making the social aftermath worse than the hurricane.

Now, listen very carefully: "The floor and the winepress SHALL NOT FEED THEM, AND THE NEW WINE SHALL FAIL IN HER"!!!!! (Hos. 9:2)

In other words, they (the deluded Israelites among us) shall fail to comprehend the New Covenant (new wine) because of their whoring (race-mixing and universalism). There is simply no doubt that the Judeo-Christians of our race are hopelessly deluded culturally and theologically, believing every lie the Jews tell them. Hence, they follow the Zionists, who are the SWORN ENEMIES OF THE MESSIAH, straight into the HELL of ignorance and deceit, not to mention the ignominy of unjust wars and the oppression of innocent people, all the while praising themselves for their theology, refusing to see how their eschatology (end-times interpretations) has failed, expecting to be blessed by blessing the anti-Christ. Their religion is nothing but vanity and foolishness.

Can anyone be more deluded than this?

Dispensationalist doctrine is, in fact, a COMPROMISE WITH JUDAISM, which they claim to have supplanted, because it allows these modern Pharisees to claim that "Spiritual Israel" has been "adopted" or "grafted into" literal Israel. The problem is that the Bible teaches no such thing as a spiritual REPLACEMENT. In fact, even the Jews reject this theory, calling it "Replacement Theology." At the same time, the rabbis of Judaism are most comfortable, even serene, living with this false teaching. They quietly encourage it, because it does not seriously challenge their literal claim of being "God’s chosen people," Israel. "Let the fools be fools. It is to our advantage."

This Judeo-Christian doctrine is called DISPENSATIONALISM. It begins with the false assumption that the Jewish people are Israel and that the "Church Dispensation" began when the Jews rejected "their own Messiah." In addition, Dispensationalism teaches that we are ALL SAVED by mere belief in Jesus Christ, without having to obey the Law(s) of God, including the Ten Commandments. This seductive philosophy is built upon a reservoir of carefully selected Bible quotations, handpicked by the false priests of various denominations out of various different contexts and then, like too many cooks seasoning the stew, reassembled into the new, erroneous witches’ brew of diverse nonsense! But it is NOT Scriptural. It is a presumptuous lie; and the Jews are most happy – even ecstatic -- to let the Dispensationalists perpetuate this grotesque lie, because it does not challenge their presumed authority over THEIR interpretation of the Torah, as long as these "believers" do not question their claim of being "God’s chosen people."

At the same time, the Dispensationalists never ask themselves or the Jews this most important question: "At what point did God replace the racially exclusive, PATERNAL line of descent, copiously documented in Scripture, with the racially inclusive MATERNAL line of descent of modern Judaism?" This is a verboten question. No Judeo-Christian theologian dares to ask this question, because the answer to this question catches the Jews in two lies: the pretense that they are the descendants of Israel and the fable that their religion is the religion of Moses. Didn’t Peter and Paul warn us to beware of Jewish fables? (2 Peter 1:16, Titus 1:14.)

The question "Who is an Israelite?" is a totally different question from "Who is a Jew?" The former can only be answered by the science of genetics. There is no such thing as "Spiritual Israel" in Scripture. The latter question can only be answered theologically or culturally. Since the Jews are a mixture of all races, it could be said that they are universally mongrelized. There is no place in the Bible where the racially exclusive Covenants are/were transferred to either 1.) a different line of descent, or 2.) a universal "church." Both of these doctrines, the former Jewish and the latter Judeo-Christian, have evolved directly from Pharisaic doctrine. Rest assured, the Bible teaches no such thing.

So, how is it possible for the Covenants to be transferred from the Jews to THE CHURCH of Dispensationalism, when they never belonged to the Jews in the first place? Despite being a racially mixed culture, the Jews have stolen the genetic/ethnic/racial identity of True Israel. The Jews are a culture composed of identity thieves. The Dispensationalists, knowing that the Jews reject Yahshua Messiah, had to invent a fictitious story, in order to let the Jews off the hook and give themselves a plausible claim to the Covenants. But they are twice deceived: first by the Jews and furthermore by themselves! Buying a fraudulent deed from a thief does not give you ownership of the property! The TRUE OWNER will have something to say about this!

From the New Testament, we have the following answer, contained in the parable of the evil husbandmen:

"Then said the lord of the vineyard [Yahweh], What shall I do? I will send my beloved son: it may be they will reverence him when they see him. But when the husbandmen saw him, they reasoned among themselves, saying, This is the heir: come, let us kill him, that the inheritance may be ours." (Matt. 21:33-41; Mark 12:1-9; Luke 20:9-16.)

There is no doubt that the evil husbandmen of this parable are the scribes and Pharisees, who murdered the heir in order to seize the inheritance of Israel. The Pharisees are the inventors of Judaism. They have been pretending to be the rightful heirs ever since. Unless we challenge their illegal seizure of our inheritance, the true heirs will never receive it. It is ours to claim, but Yahweh is waiting to see if there are any True Israelites down here lucid enough to stake their claim. (Lord knows I am doing all I can to turn on the Light!) If none of the True Heirs show up at the reading of the Last Will and Testament, then the whole proceeding goes into Probate Court; and we know which ethnic minority has the lawyers that will rush in to assume control those proceedings, if we allow that to happen!!!!

As Anglo-Saxon-Christian Israel slowly awakens from its collective amnesia, the True Heirs will begin to demand that which is rightfully theirs.

Getting back to the word Jew, in the Old Testament, the first instance of the word ‘Jew’ occurs in II Kings 16:6.

A careful reading of this episode shows that the word Judah, in this particular instance, is used to designate the HOUSE OF JUDAH as DISTINGUISHED FROM the House of Israel. As such, this usage alone contradicts their claim that the Jews represent the whole people of Israel, for this passage tells us that the House of Israel (the Ten Northern Tribes) is at war with the "Jews," as represented by the Two-Tribed House of Judah, comprised of Judah and Benjamin. How do the Jews explain this discrepancy of meaning? They don’t. They ignore it; and they hope that you will ignore it too. From this passage, the Jews can only be equated with the House of Judah, since the House of Israel has gone its separate way, eventually to migrate north and west into Europe, through the Caucasus Mountains, thus becoming known as the Caucasian people.

Furthermore, as can be ascertained from the Biblical accounts (2 Kings 18:13), many of the people of Judah and Benjamin accompanied the House of Israel in the Assyrian deportations. Yet, these are often overlooked by those who comment on the subject, and those of Judah and Benjamin who remained continued to be known as the two tribes, later going into Babylonian captivity.

[For a detailed study of the differences between the Two Houses, please refer to: http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/newsletter/2006_12_1.php ]

The linguistic fact is that the use of the word Jew is NEVER JUSTIFIED IN THE OLD TESTAMENT. (We will get to the New Testament shortly.) The word Judah is always the only accurate and proper usage of the Hebrew Jehudi (#3064). Wherever Judah is translated as Jew, it is a false, deceptive translation. The rabbis of Judaism, using their wily language skills, have encouraged and facilitated this false translation, because it perpetuates their masquerade as Judah, which was begun by the Masoretic rabbis of the Jewish (Idumean/Edomite) Dispersion! The Dispersion of the Israelites was a completely separate and distinct historical event, that happened over 800 years earlier! For centuries, this continuing masquerade has enabled the rabbis of Judaism to fool all of the world’s best theologians, except for Identity theologians, those of us who know that there always was and still is a RACIAL AND THEOLOGICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN Judahites and Jews.

(There are actually many Jews, such as Benjamin Freedman and Alfred Lilienthal, who have admitted this fact, but their work is, for obvious reasons, not promoted by the Kosher Thought Control Matrix. Here is a good example of Freedman’s work on this subject, an essay entitled "Jesus Was NOT a Jew": http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm )

Strong’s Concordance, and/or its editors, following the interpolations of the Jews, falsely adds to the definition of Yehudi: "a Jew." But we know that this definition cannot stand up to the test of the patrilineal descent that is prescribed for all Judahites. The Jewish people have never met this standard, nor have they observed or required it, to this day. By this deceptive use of the word Jew in the OT, the Jews have simply written themselves into Old Testament history. With Luciferian cunning, the Edomite Jews have co-opted the literature and history of their historical enemy, Israel, pretending to have been places and to have done things that none of their ancestors ever did. Abraham was not a Jew. Moses was not a Jew. None of the Twelve Tribes were Jews. There were no Jews at the reading of the Law at Mt. Sinai. All of these ISRAELITE TRADITIONS AND EVENTS have been appropriated by the rabbis of Judaism, who have, since 150 BC, been making such false claims. The fact is that the only participation of their ancestors in OT history was as the intractable enemies of True Israel.

The whore (Judaism) has put on White raiment (the Law of Moses), but no one has ever bothered to check her filthy undergarments (violation of all of the laws of Moses, including race-mixing).

By simply substituting the word Jew for the word Judah, the Jews have been able to posture as Judah for 2,000 years. The fact that they also claim to be the whole people of Israel is even more ridiculous and thoroughly contradicted by II Kings 16:6! Their claim to being "Semitic" is just as outrageous, because that is a RACIAL TERM. A Semite, or Shemite, is a patrilineal descendant of the Hebrew patriarch, Shem. THIS IS THE BIBLICAL DEFINITION OF A "SHEMITE." No one else can claim to be a "Semite." No mongrelized people can ever call themselves "Semites" without engaging in blatant Biblical deception.

Historically, the word Jew did not appear in the English language until it was first introduced in 1775, in Sheridan’s play, "The Rivals." Earlier plays, such as those of Shakespeare and Marlowe, plus the original King James Version of the Bible, did not contain this word, as the letter J was not in use in the English language yet. Still, this word was only applied to the modern, ethnic Jews, who are of Ashkenazi and Sephardic extraction. But this all-important ethnic fact didn’t stop the translators from falsely applying it, retroactively, to the Judahites or Israelites of the Bible! Since the modern word Jew applies only to the mongrelized people composed of Edomite (Sephardic) and Khazar (Ashkenazi) Jews, there is no way that this word can be applied, anachronistically, to hereditary, Adamic, Hebrew Judahites, a people who very carefully recorded their pedigree in their Temple records.

By playing fast and loose with such words, and with relentless, round-the-clock indoctrination, the Jewish impersonation of Israel has been thoroughly established. The resulting false translations, based on Jewish Masoretic interpolations, are what most Christians blindly accept as Scripture; but, as you have been witnessing, these translations are false and misleading. The fact that the word Jew exists at all in the Old Covenant of the KJV is a testament to their brilliant, Luciferian brainwashing techniques. Let us give the Devil his due!!!!

There is a reason why Jesus tells us: "Be ye therefore wise as serpents, yet guileless as doves." (Matt. 10:6.) He is telling us to be wary of the Serpent People: the Jewish people. The Sheep have been guileless, but not very wise.

The Jewish masquerade as Israel and Judah is history’s most immaculate deception.

{Link to my detailed article on this very subject: http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/newsletter/2006_12_1.php }

I repeat, because this is a most important epiphany for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear: The word Jew DOES NOT BELONG IN THE OLD TESTAMENT. Wherever it so occurs, it is a false translation. The word Judah is the only correct usage, as it conveys and retains both the ethnic composition of the people of Judah and the racial exclusiveness which Yahwah and the Bible demand.

From this day forward, you should never confuse a Jew with a Judahite; nor should you confuse a Jew with an Israelite. Jew is a culturally and theologically vague word. Judah and Israel are VERY SPECIFIC racial and cultural words.

One way to visualize the distinction between Jews and Judahites is to use Set Theory. You may remember studying Set Theory in school. It is a great technique for delineating the meanings of words, so that apples aren’t accidentally compared with oranges. Visualize a circle that contains the words Judah and Israel within it. Outside of this circle are all other races and peoples, all having circles of their own, including Canaanites, Edomites, Khazars, Blacks, Orientals, Arabs, and, strictly speaking, even Whites who do not have the DNA of either Israel or Judah. These would be the non-Covenant Whites, who are, nevertheless, permitted to enter the circle of Judah and Israel through marriage (Joseph’s wife, Moses’ wife, etc.). Thus, the Covenant People of Judah and Israel are clearly distinguished from ALL OTHER PEOPLES OF THE EARTH.

Now, let’s do the same thing with the word Jew. Visualize a circle, which contains the word Jew in it. Since the Jewish people are a conglomeration of all races and peoples, the Jewish Set cannot exclude any other circle. All of the other circles penetrate the boundary of the Jewish circle, because the Jewish people have NEVER BEEN A RACIALLY EXCLUSIVE PEOPLE. They have always mixed with the indigenous populations of every country they have ever entered and settled in. This was true, even before the Tribe of Judah came into existence, because, as you will soon discover, the Jewish people originated as Canaanites, not as Israelites!

We can summarize the difference between a Jew and a Judahite in the following, concise way:

1. A Judahite is a White person, a purebred, genealogical descendant of the Patriarch, Judah, whose descent can be traced through Judah all the way back to Adam and Eve. Thus, a Judahite is also a Hebrew and a Shemite. These people have always been subject to the Law of Moses, in one form or another, perfectly or imperfectly, as was the choice of our ancestors. The modern form of the Mosaic Law is Christianity, which is another doctrine which we keep to varying degrees!
2. A Jew is a mongrelized person, whose genetic information comes from any race on earth, but primarily from the ancient Kenites, the descendants of Cain. These people have always practiced race-mixing and paganism. The two main branches of Jews are the Sephardic branch (5%), which is of Kenite/Canaanite extraction, and the Ashkenazi (95%), which is a genetic combination of Japheths, Mongols and Turks of Hittite (also Canaanite) origin. Their religion, Judaism, is a counterfeit version of the Law of Moses. Judaism has never paid more than lip service to Moses, since the true values of Judaism are contained in the Talmud, which is both a perversion and a denial of the Mosaic Law. This religion was invented by the Pharisees, not by Moses. Judaism has always been irreconcilably opposed to Christianity.

{The Turks are not properly the Hittites, although occupying the same territory in later times. The Turks originated as a westward-migrating group from China, who were known as the Uighurs. As they moved west, they absorbed more and more White blood. Turkmenistan is named for them, where they remained settled for several centuries, and where at least some of their descendants are found today. Anatolia, modern Turkey, was inhabited in Greco-Roman times by tribes related to the Greeks, Phoenicians, Thracians, Kelts, Scythians, Armenians, and "White" Syrians, aka, Cappadocians. It has been, and would be still, quite difficult to relate any particular Anatolian tribe of the Roman period to the Hittites, although it is certainly not impossible that at least some Hittite blood persisted. The Turks, coming from Asia, took Bagdhad circa 1055 AD, and all of Anatolia (Asia Minor) by 1071, amalgamating and converting to Islam many of the region’s surviving inhabitants.}

Many Christians are under the false impression that Judaism will eventually accept Jesus as the Messiah, but this is a false assumption. This mistake is caused by the fact that prophecies, which pertain exclusively to True Israel, are applied to the Jewish people, who are not Israelites or Judahites at all. Still, these Christians do not insist that the Jews accept the Biblical Jesus. This is a very grave their mistake on their part, for Christ’s death and Resurrection are the fulcrum of the Christian Faith. As Paul says, "And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith also is vain." (I Cor. 15:14.)

In the words of Rabbi Lerner:

Source: http://judaism.about.com/library/3_askrabbi_c/bl_jesus.htm

Rabbi Lerner is quite accurate when he says that Jesus did not fulfill JEWISH expectations of a Messiah. That is because, as Sephardic Edomites pretending to be Judeans, they had no such expectations!!! Jesus Christ was not one of their people! He told the scribes and Pharisees of Judaism, flat out: "Ye are NOT of my sheep." (John 10:26-27.) Rabbi Lerner is simply admitting this fact while pretending to be an Israelite. The fact is that ALL ISRAEL expected a Messiah, and Jesus fulfilled hundreds of SCRIPTURAL AND JUDAHITE expectations of the Messiah. And that is why the Judahite people and the Benjamite people of the nation of Judea accepted Him, until the Jewish rabbis began to tell lies about Him, thus degrading Him in the eyes of His own people! If you are paying attention, you have noticed that the Jews are still degrading Jesus to this day!

A few more quotes from prominent rabbis:

"…the Talmud has been the chief authority in Jewish life. True, the Bible was theoretically the ultimate authority, but the Bible was understood as the Talmud interpreted it." (The Story of Judaism, Bernard J. Bamberger, p.108.)

"This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians – that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression…Judaism is not the religion of the Bible. (Judaism and the Christian Predicament, Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, 1967, p.59.)

"You will notice that a great difference exists between the Jewish and Christian religions. But these are not all. We Judians consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other…we emphasized that there is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian religion…There is not any similarity between the two concepts." (Rabbi Maggal, quoted in the National Jewish Information Service, August 21, 1961.)

"Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism…throughout these changes in name…the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered." (The Pharisees, the Sociological Background of Their Faith, Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, p. 21.)

"Jewish life was regulated by the teachings of the Pharisees: the whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view…Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and the thought of the Jew for all the future…It makes ‘separatism’ its chief characteristic." (History and Destiny of the Jews, Dr. Josef Kastein, p. 69.)

So, how can the racially exclusive people of Israel and Judah, who practiced the Law of Moses, be equated with the racially mongrelized people of Edom and Ashkenaz, who practice the merely religious exclusivism of the Pharisees? I hope that you can now appreciate the fact that the racial, religious and cultural gap between Israelites and Jews is vast, indeed!

It turns out that this word occurs only once in the Old Testament; but where it occurs, it confirms our next thesis, namely, that Judah and Judea are also words with very different meanings; and to confuse the two is to do a great injustice to the meaning and intent of the divinely inspired authors of Scripture.

Here is the lone citation from the OT:

"Be it known to the king, that we went into the province of Judea, to the house of the great God, which is builded with great stones, and timber is laid in the walls, and this work goeth on, and prospereth in their hands." (Ezra 5:8.)

Without a familiarity of the history of those days, including the ethnic composition of various non-Israelites peoples, you cannot know that the Judahites who returned from the Babylonian Captivity REFUSED TO FELLOWSHIP with the mongrelized people who had taken the place of the Judahites, after they were deported to Babylon. Those Judahites were absent from Judea for a period of 70 years. The books of Ezra and Nehemiah make it very clear that the Temple was to be rebuilt EXCLUSIVELY BY GENETIC JUDAHITES. The Judahite priests meticulously examined the records of the Temple, checking the genealogies of all the Judahites who returned from Babylon, to verify their pedigree. (Ez. 2:59-62; 10:16; Neh. 7:5, 61, 64.) Those men and priests among them, who had taken foreign (non-Israelite) wives, had to dismiss them and their half-breed children OR BE REJECTED THEMSELVES, just as Jacob’s brother Esau was rejected for taking Hittite wives.

Ezra and Nehemiah were in total compliance with Deut. 23:2, which unequivocally states that, "No mongrel [Hebrew mamzer] shall enter the congregation of Yahweh." I know that the KJV states "bastard" instead of mongrel, but the Hebrew word mamzer (#4464) means "mongrel." This is just another poor translation. Everyone knows what a mongrel is. Besides, both Pharez and Zarah, Judah’s only two unmixed sons by Tamar, were bastards (born out of wedlock), yet they were acceptable as Israelites, so that proves that Deut. 23:2 should have been translated with the word mongrel instead of bastard, for that is the true meaning of the Hebrew word. It is also true that the word bastard was also understood to mean "mongrel" until very recent times. The Greek nothos (#3541) still has this connotation, although Strong’s Concordance does not mention it. Zondervan’s Exhaustive Concordance relates nothos to xenos (# 2838, "foreigner, alien") in several instances of the New Testament. Young’s Analytical Concordance entry for bastard lists both the Hebrew mamzer and the Greek nothos, with elaboration, although Young refers us to Heb. 12:8.

Although Paul obviously uses the Greek nothos in a figurative sense in this passage, he still chooses to stress the teachings of the flesh and blood forefathers of Israel. The context is still Israel, exclusively. What he is saying is that, if the Hebrews he is addressing do not accept chastisement, they will be like mongrels, not of Israel at all. This is quite a putdown!!! It is the modernists who ignore this meaning, for obvious reasons.

Furthermore, after the return of Judah and Benjamin from the Babylonian Captivity, Ezra and Nehemiah rejected the advances of the local people, who were of mixed descent, primarily Shelahites (half-breed Canaanites) and other non-Judahites who had settled in the land of Judah after the Judahites were taken away captive to Babylon. (2 Kings 24:14-16; 25:22-26; Jer. 22:25-27; Jer. 24; 40:5-12; Jer. 41.) These non-Judahite Judeans, who were afterwards known as Samaritans. wanted to help with the rebuilding of the Temple, but the true Judahites told them to get lost. The Judahites firmly told those Judeans, "We don’t need or want your help!" (Ezra 4:1-3.) It would have been a violation of God’s law to allow half-breeds, mongrels, and other non-Israelites to enjoy equal status while working on Yah’s Temple. It is permitted for Israelites to HIRE non-Israelites, but it is not permissible for non-Israelites to be PARTNERS in such an enterprise!

The racial exclusivity of the Judahites is explicitly confirmed by the books of Ezra and Nehemiah. Their rejection of non-Judahites was firm and decisive, for they knew that the House of Judah was to bring forth the Messiah, who could be nothing less than a PURE-BLOODED JUDAHITE OF THE HOUSE OF DAVID. To allow non-Judahite stock to enter into the Kingdom would thus guarantee the failure of the Messiah’s coming mission, for the Messiah could only come from the pure-blooded stock of hereditary Judah. PERIOD. Just as Noah was perfect (without genetic blemish), the Messiah could only be likewise, without blemish. Otherwise, He could not fulfill the promise of the Kinsman Redeemer. This is why the New Testament begins with the genealogy of Jesus Christ, in Matthew, Chapter 1. It is the documentary proof that Yahshua Messiah was a pure-blooded Judahite. No person, other than a pure-blooded Judahite, would have been acceptable as the Messiah.

Now, in the New Testament, we have two new words from which the word ‘Jew’ is translated. In the Greek, they are Iouda and Ioudaia (Strong’s 2448 and 2449, respectively). Iouda is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew Judah. Ioudaia is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew Judea.

Like their corresponding Hebrew counterparts, these two Greek words do not have the same meaning; but the entire world of Biblical scholarship, thanks to the historical word games played by the rabbis, routinely treats them as if they represent one and the same ethnicity.

But Iouda refers only to the racially exclusive people of Judah. Ioudaia designates a much larger group, namely: ALL the residents of the Roman district of Judea, irrespective of their racial, cultural, or religious heritage. This district of Judea, having incorporated the formerly Canaanite/Edomite nation of Idumea, was much larger and more ethnically diverse from the Old Testament land of Judah. Again, the rabbis of Judaism thrive on the confusion of these two terms, treating them as if they have the same meaning, designating the same set of people. They want to make sure you don’t understand the Bible’s original semantic clarity, which demands that we take note of racial and ethnic distinctions.

To equate these two words would be like equating the White, Christian founding fathers of America with the polyglot, multi-racial hodge-podge that America has become today. Anyone with a brain cannot possibly equate these two groups, as the former is distinctly, ethnically of the White Race, while the latter is all of the collective inhabitants of the country, taken as a whole. At that time, only land-owning White Men were allowed to be voting citizens. Today, people of all races, including women, are allowed to vote. So, the "voters" of that era cannot possibly be compared to the "voters" of modern America. It is a totally different demographic today. The former group was racially and sexually exclusive, while the latter group is ethnically, racially and sexually inclusive.

Dear Anglo-Saxon Israelites, is it conceivable that the MOTLEY CREW cohabiting in America today could possibly agree on the set of principles known as the Constitution of the United States? ("Ebony…Ivory…living in perfect harmony." In spite of such cheery lyrics, we don’t see pop stars like Paul McCartney choosing to live in the ghettoes of New Orleans!!!! He prefers to reside in his exclusive mansion, outside of London, away from the rabble.)

Of course, the Jews want us to lump all of us, except themselves, into this hopeless polyglot by referring to America as a "nation of immigrants." But it was exclusively the original White settlers/immigrants who founded America. Neither the Jews nor the members of any other race had anything whatsoever to do with instituting America’s political and religious foundations and subsequent economic development, which was the direct result of what this exclusively White Christian citizenry produced.

The same distinction is true of Judahites and Judeans.

The historical record shows very clearly that, in the year 150 BC, the ethnically White nation of Judah was forcibly merged, by war, with the ethnically Canaanite nation of Idumea. Remember, these two ethnic groups had been historic enemies; and this enmity can be traced all the way back to Adam and Eve and their encounter with the Serpent in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 3:15), with the Jewish seedline emanating from Cain and the Israelite seedline emanating from Seth. Several books of the Old Testament record the fact that Yahweh had ordered the children of Israel to EXTERMINATE THESE CAINITES/CANAANITES; but the Israelites were not cold-blooded enough to do so.

Yahweh’s commandments to destroy these people are recorded in Deut. 12:1-10, as well as in many other Biblical verses that support this position. Why would Yahweh ask us (Joshua, Saul, David, Solomon, etc.) to exterminate these creatures/beings? "New Testament Christians," not understanding the evil nature of these fallen creatures, actually attempt to pass judgment on Yahweh, calling Him, quite disrespectfully, the "God of the Old Testament," whom they perceive as cruel for issuing such a command. They do not understand that these creatures were the mixed offspring of the fallen angels, who survived the Flood. These people possessed the DNA of Nachash himself, the Fallen Angel, Satan. As such, these creatures were genetically disposed to do evil continually, just as they did during the days of Noah. If it was OK for Yahweh to destroy them BEFORE Noah’s Flood, then why not after?

These Canaanites were the ethnic progenitors of the people known today as the Sephardic Jews, who are named after the region of Mt. Sephar, in the land of Canaan. (Gen. 10:30; Ob. 1:20.) There is little doubt that the name, "Sephardic," originated with the Sepharvaim of Edom (II Kings 17:24; 18:34; 19:13; Isa. 36:19; 37:1). It was from this ethnic group that the priesthood known as the Pharisees arose. Regarding the exact historical dates for the merger of Judah and Idumea, William Finck and I have studied different sources, so his dating and mine are about ten years apart. I got my information from various encyclopedias, which suggest that John Hyrcanus, a true Judahite monarch, acceded to the Maccabean throne in the year 150 BC. Mr. Finck relies more on Josephus. Here is Mr. Finck’s account of the timing and circumstances of the rise of the Pharisees, according to Josephus.

{Outside of Josephus and the Book of I Maccabees, historical details concerning Palestine in the centuries between the Persian and Roman Periods are sketchy. For instance, of the Edomite incorporation into Judea, Strabo says, "The Idumeans are Nabateans, but owing to a sedition they were banished from there, joined the Judeans, and shared in the same customs with them." (Geography, 1b.2.34.) To any Biblical scholar, it should be apparent that, while he has elements of the story right, he is very much confused on some important points. We know, today, from archeological research, that the Nabateans were an Arabian tribe that had invaded and incorporated some of the territory of Edom, between the sixth and fourth centuries, BC. Strabo was not privy to such distinctions, as an outsider looking in. Yet, his account is essentially correct.

The accounts of Josephus are corroborated in several instances by I Maccabees, and, since there is no other reliable source for this history concerning Judea in the second century BC, we must rely on his testimony. While some have questioned the reliability of Josephus as a historian, we certainly cannot offer a varying or alternative account without citing other historical sources. We cannot invent our own account if we wish to contest Josephus!

Josephus first places the Pharisees, as well as the Sadducees and Essenes, as early as the rule of Jonathan, "the Maccabee" (and so the name, Maccabees), the first of the line of Maccabees, who was slain circa 142 BC, about the 170^th year of the Seleucid (Greek) era, as Josephus calculates. (Ref.: Antiquities 13.5.9; 13.6.7 (for date)).

Simon, brother of Jonathan, became the high priest and ruler of the Judahites (hereinafter Judeans) and reigned for 8 years before he was slain by his own son-in-law. (Ref. Antiquities 13.6.7; 13.7.4.)

John Hyrcanus, the son of Simon, then became high priest in place of his father. Josephus puts the first year of his reign in the 162^nd Olympiad, where Whiston, the translator of Josephus, has a footnote insisting that this is an error, and the year must be the second of the 161^st, which would be, roughly, 135 BC (the 162^nd Olympiad is the four-year period of 132-129 BC). It is after 135 BC that John Hyrcanus began the employ of foreign mercenaries, and began to subjugate and forcibly "convert" the Idumeans to Mosaic Law, although there is scant information as to how much of Judahite tradition, besides being given the choice between circumcision and death, was imposed upon these new "citizens" of Judea. (Ref. Antiquities 13.8.2; 13.9.1.)

Unfortunately, I Maccabees ends with the ascension of John Hyrcanus to the high priesthood but says little of his deeds. (I Mac. 16:19-24.) Yet, it is quite clear from the context of I Mac. (i.e. 5:65,66) that the Edomites had not yet been incorporated into the political body of the Judeans, and, therefore, there is no reason to doubt the accounts given by Josephus. The Pharisees, as a sect, existed by 150 BC, and the Edomites (Idumeans) were subjugated and incorporated by the Judeans (not vice-versa) about 130 BC. }

In Book XIII, Chap. IX, Para. 1, Whiston’s translation states: "Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea, and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews [sic: Judeans. Whiston commits the error of assuming that ethnic Judahites can be called "Jews"]; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers [that is, to stay in Idumea – Eli], that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Jewish [Sic! Judahite] ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Jews [Judeans]."

As I explained under the heading of the word Jew, it is not possible to lump unmongrelized Adamic Judahites together with mongrelized Jews, as if there were no difference between these very distinct populations. This is like equating native American Indian tribes with the Founding Fathers, which groups are of completely different races. Whiston, like all other commentators and translators who labor under Jewish deception, fails to take these ethnic distinctions into consideration in his sloppy translation. He also makes the false assumption that the Judahites practiced Judaism. But from this account, it is clear that the Idumeans began to accept the religion of Judah for the first time, as a result of submitting to circumcision. The Idumeans were NOT "converted to Judaism." Accepting non-Israelites into their nation was itself a VIOLATION OF THE MOSAIC LAW. The correct way of characterizing this transition is to say: Mosaism was converted to Judaism by virtue of accepting Mosaically forbidden mongrels as citizens of Judea. There is no way that the Law of Moses can be equated with Judaism, which has always been a DISTORTION of the Mosaic Law. The Jews themselves admit that Judaism’s traditions go back to ancient Babylon. Josephus confirms this at 15.2.4, where he informs us that Herod imported the priest, Ananelus, from Babylon and made him high priest. Thus, Mosaism, under Herod the Idumean, became corrupted into Babylonian Judaism.

Even though Hyrcanus had defeated the Idumeans militarily, he had actually fallen into the trap that was arranged by Herod’s father, Antipater, who had gained Julius Caesar’s consent to have Herod and Hyrcanus be co-regents. Thus, the Hyrcanus violation of the Law of Moses led to the usurpation of his own throne. Josephus puts it this way:

"The principal men of the Jews [sic, Judeans – Eli] came thither, to accuse Phasaelus [Herod’s Edomite brother] and Herod, and they said that Hyrcanus had indeed the appearance of reigning, but that these men [Phasaelus and Herod] had all the power." (Antiquities, 14.12.2.)

Just as in America today, the President has the appearance of reigning, BUT the Jews (neo-cons, Zionists, communists and rabbis) have all the power. We can regard today’s usurpation of the American government by the Jews as a repetition of Judea’s history and relationship with Idumea.

In addition, Josephus tells us that Herod slaughtered the entire Sanhedrin that were loyal to Hyrcanus (14.9.4). It is clear that, from that point on, Hyrcanus took a stand against the Pharisees, while Herod had always been their enabler. Hyrcanus was not aware that Herod was planning to murder him as well.

At 14.16.3, Josephus informs us that Herod brought his own people (Idumeans) into Jerusalem to run the government: "And now Herod having overcome his enemies, his care was to govern those FOREIGNERS WHO HAD BEEN HIS ASSISTANTS, FOR THE CROWD OF STRANGERS RUSHED TO SEE THE TEMPLE, AND THE SACRED THINGS IN THE TEMPLE…" These "foreigners," being his assistants from Idumea, were to become the new government. Under Herod, the favored priesthood became the Pharisees.

After Herod had usurped the throne, he proceeded to attack the Judahite priesthood. First, he murdered Aristobulus (15.3.3). He then murdered Hyrcanus (15.6.2) and his Judahite wife, Mariamne (15.7.3) and made Costobarus, an Idumean, governor of Idumea and Gaza (15.7.9), eventually putting all of the dynasty of Hyrcanus to death and undermining the Mosaic Law (15.7.10), instituting, via the Pharisees, Babylonian and Roman customs (15.8.3; 15.9.5).

Thus consolidating the usurpation of Judah by the Idumeans, Herod turned the tables on the House of Judah, just a few years after Hyrcanus gloried in his military victory. Like the Russians who would later absorb the Khazar Jews into Russia with a military victory, the Khazar Jews never ceased to connive and sabotage Christian Russia until they eventually defeated Russia from within. This was the Bolshevik coup.

At 18.2.1, Josephus tells the story of the three sects that had emerged during this time: the Sadducees, the Pharisees and the Essenes. Of these three, only the Essenes are favorably characterized. Earlier, in 13.10.6, Josephus says of the Pharisees: "What I would now explain is this, that the Pharisees have delivered the people a great many observances by succession from their fathers, which are not written in the law of Moses; and for that reason it is the Sadducees reject them."

The question of their exact ethnic composition remains. Were the Pharisees Judahites or Idumeans? Obviously the usurpation of the throne of Judah, as described by Josephus, cannot have happened without a slew of Judahite traitors and patsies doing the Jews’ dirty work. Some have said that the Pharisees were all pure-blooded Judahites and that there was never any Idumean membership; but this cannot be accurate, for Jesus Himself tells us that they were the literal children of the devil (John 8:44). At John 8:33, Jesus tricked them into admitting that their ancestors had never been in bondage. Since the Israelites were in bondage in Egypt and the Judahites were additionally in bondage in Babylon for 70 years, all of the ancestors of the true Judahites had been in bondage at least twice. But this was not true of the Edomites, who had a small portion of Abraham’s blood through Jacob’s brother, Esau. This is how the Jews can claim Abraham as their "father." It is also possible that the Pharisees arose from the Nethinim, the Canaanites who were first hired by King David as servants. These servants would have access to the records of the house of Judah. Knowing the Jews as we do, the likelihood of many, if not most, of these Nethinim being spies for the Canaanite tribes is very great. Neh. 11:21 tells us that these Nethinims, hired servants, lived in Ophel, a residence outside of the city of Jerusalem. The origin of the Pharisees is an event that is shrouded in mystery. The Jews would like us to think that they evolved out of the Levitical priesthood, but there is no evidence for this.

Whatever their exact origin, we know that they evolved into the rabbinical priesthood, the Synagogue of Satan. Here is the encounter that Jesus Christ had with them, concerning their ancestry:

"Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed..." [Note here that Yahweh had made a similar statement to Cain at Gen. 4:7. Yahshua was addressing Cain’s children in the same manner!!!] "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. They answered him, WE be Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free? [In other words, they’re saying, WE ARE FREE! What do we need to be freed from? But True Israel understood that they needed to be freed from the sin debt of the fall of Adam and Eve, as well as the sin debt of virtually continuous historical disobedience to the Law, from the moment that it was delivered to Israel at Sinai!!! The Pharisees acknowledged NONE OF THIS!!! Christ’s message was one of REPENTANCE! But these Jews were saying, "What? What do we need to repent for? We ARE ALREADY FREE!" Even today, the Jews declare their absolute innocence of any wrongdoing, with respect to non-Jews, EVER!!! Where in Scripture does Yahweh pronounce Israel INNOCENT? What more proof do you need that they are not Israel?] Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever commiteth sin is the servant of sin. [Gen. 4:7 again!] And the servant ["Cursed be Canaan. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren." -- Gen. 9:25-27.] abideth not in the house forever [Cain, Canaan and Esau were all kicked out of the house, and their descendants became the servants of Israel]: but the Son abideth forever. If the son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed. I know that ye are Abraham’s seed [in part through Esau], but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you." (John 8 31-37.)

The Messiah was the "hope of Israel." True Israelites hear Him and follow Him, although most of us have done so only partially; and many of us have followed the Pharisee wolves while attempting to following Him. Unlike the White Race, the Pharisess and their Jewish descendants utterly REJECT HIM.

At Matt 23: 31-36, Jesus tells these same Pharisees,

"Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the CHILDREN OF THEM WHICH KILLED THE PROPHETS. Fill ye up the measure of YOUR FATHERS. Ye serpents. Ye GENERATION [RACE, #1081, gennema, offspring] OF VIPERS, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? …That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous ABEL unto the blood of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar."

It is not possible that Jesus was accusing an assemblage of Pharisees, in 33 AD, of a murder that was committed 4,000 years previously! That would have been a false accusation!!! He was speaking of their whole family tree, their genome (gennema), a race of vipers, a race of murderers, which began with Cain.

Given these historical and theological facts, it is obvious to me that the Pharisees probably began as a combined Judahite/Nethinim sect, but under Idumean influence, for Josephus clearly tells us that they were influenced by Babylonians, such as Antipater and Ananelus. Hence, just as the Democratic Party was infiltrated and taken over by Rothschild Jew agents such as Colonel EM House, Woodrow Wilson, Bernard Baruch, Henry Morgenthau, Felix Frankfurter and Franklin Roosevelt, the Pharisees started out as traitors to their own people in return for Edomite money. But under Herod’s continuous ethnic cleansing policies, the Judahites were gradually eliminated in favor of Idumean Jews. This is how the Kingdom of Judah was usurped by a cabal of Judahite traitors [like our Democratic Party] and Idumean saboteurs [like today’s Zinoists and communists] and also how Mosaism began to be replaced by Judaism. Even this has a modern parallel, in that Christianity has been corrupted into "Judeo-Christianity."

Going back to the wars between the Canaanites and Israelites, Yahweh even told the children of Israel that, if they failed to exterminate these mixed descendants of the fallen angels that survived Noah’s Flood (collectively called the Canaanites), they would come back to haunt them/us until the Day of Judgment.

Here is the record: "But if you will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then shall it come to pass, that those that you let remain of them SHALL BE PRICKS IN YOUR EYES AND THORNS IN YOUR SIDES, AND SHALL VEX YOU IN THE LAND WHEREIN YOU DWELL." (Deut. 33:55.) Do you know how to spell "prick," "thorn," and "vex"? I do. It’s spelled J-E-W. And it was Antipater and Herod, with their cast of Edomite henchmen, that pricked and vexed Judah at that time.

Now, returning to the subject of Judea in the time of Christ: The forced merger of these two separate and distinct nations (Judah and Idumea) was the beginning of the Jewish impersonation of Israel and Judah, with the first Idumean accepting the rite of circumcision about the year 140 BC. This act, which was approved by King John Hyrcanus of Judah (who was a pure-blooded Judahite), WAS A DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF YAHWEH. We are not to fellowship with non-Israelites, let alone make common cause with them – and certainly not with Jews, Satan’s bloodline, who are the avowed, self-proclaimed enemies of our very Race and of our Kinsman Redeemer, Jesus Christ.

Paul said : "Be not unequally yoked with unbelievers." (II Cor. 6:14) What are the Jews, if not unbelievers? By the way, William Finck’s translation of II Cor. 6:14 is, "Do not become yoked together with untrustworthy aliens."

The historians and theologians falsely characterize this forced merger as "the conversion of the Idumeans to Judaism." Nothing of the kind happened. In fact, the EXACT OPPOSITE happened! Here, again, the rabbis of Judaism, by a very crafty choice of words, have distorted history. The reality is that this event was the BIRTH OF A NEW RELIGION, THE BEGINNING OF JUDAISM, for, as everyone should know, Judaism is the religion of the Pharisees; and the Pharisees did not exist before this time! Up until this time, the Judahites of Judah practiced a racially and theologically exclusive religion, which has no specific name assigned to it in the Old Testament. Jesus referred to it as the "law and the prophets." (Matt. 7:12; 22:40; Luke 16:6.) These Pharisees, pretending to be Judahites, were engaged in the process of converting the Judahites to this NEW RELIGION! This is the historical reality.

It was the Law of Moses (Old Covenant) and Christianity (New Covenant), not Judaism, that was/is "the faith given unto the saints." (Jude 3.)

This is the historical fact, with emphasis: NEITHER THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL NOR THE HOUSE OF JUDAH EVER PRACTICED THE RELIGION OF JUDAISM, because the Law of Moses and Judaism are not the same. Just because the Jewish rabbis refer to the Law of Moses as "Judaism" does not make it so. It never was. It is not now. Nor will it ever be.

Judaism is, in fact, the CONTRADICTION OF THE LAW OF MOSES. {For a thorough discussion of the myriad ways in which Judaism violates the Law of Moses, please refer to this free online book, http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/95-theses.php }

Under Herod, the priesthood of this new religion, the Pharisees, began to call themselves Judeans, which as citizens of this Scripturally forbidden merger, they could correctly call themselves. But they could NOT refer to themselves as Judah, just as the American Indians could not refer to themselves as White Men, i.e, "palefaces". Nor did the "Indians" ever refer to themselves as "Americans." Even today, these Indians do not refer to themselves as "American." They refer to themselves by their tribal names.

The Book of Ezekiel actually prophesied the occasion of Idumea’s usurpation of Judah:

"Therefore saith Yahweh; Surely in the fire of my jealousy have I spoken against the residue of the heathen, and AGAINST ALL IDUMEA, WHICH HAVE APPOINTED MY LAND INTO THEIR POSSESSION, with the joy of their heart, with despiteful minds, to cast it out for a prey." (Ez. 36:5.)

The New Testament is a clear record of Jesus Christ’s relentless repudiation of the Pharisees and their phony new religion. Anyone who reads the New Testament cannot fail to see this; but the sheeple of Churchianity do not read their Bibles, so they cannot see the Truth. And when we Identists point out the clearly separatist language of the original autographs, they refuse to believe what their eyes are reading. Such is the nature of brainwashing, Judeo-Christian style! "But my pastor never taught me anything like this!" Exactly! Instead, they rely on the Judaized interpretations provided by their pulpitmasters, who dogmatically rule the churches. Thus, they are hopelessly lost in a jumble of confusing and contradictory terminology, which they assume is "Christianity." I can guarantee you that any Christian Identity pastor, who had the kahunas to teach this message in a mainstream church, would be summarily hastened out the door! Identity is the most hated of all Christian doctrines.

Not to worry, Jesus Himself prophesied of this eventuality. After telling us that we would be betrayed by our parents, family and friends:

"And ye shall be hated of all for my name’s sake." (Luke 21:17; John 16:2.)

The Jewish claim that Christianity "owes its origins to Judaism" is unmitigated bovine excrement. If the Jewish claim had any merit, then the Pharisees would have derived their heritage and authority from the Levitical priesthood. But the Levitical priesthood was also a hereditary priesthood, the exclusive province of racial Israelites of the tribe of Levi, so the mixed blood Pharisees could not possibly derive from the Levites. From all research to date, I have been unable to find any reference to the Pharisees that predates the year 150 BC, which is the very period that the Idumeans merged with the Judahites. It was during this turbulent time that various Judean sects emerged, creating new traditions, which began to compete with the Law and the Prophets. Many Bible historians admit this timeline, yet they do not relate the origin of this priesthood to the forbidden merger of Judah and Idumea…at exactly this historical time!!! Probably just a coincidence!

Am I getting through to you yet, dear Christian Israelite? Do you see how subtle lies by religious "authorities," distorting both history and Scripture, lead us astray? Once we accept their distortions as truth, then supporting the antichrist in the Name of Christ is the result. Judeo-Christianity believes that evil is good. With respect to these false priests, Yahweh says:

"Because with lies ye have made the heart of the righteous sad, whom I have not made sad; and strengthened the hands of the wicked, that he should not return from his wicked way, by promising him life." (Eze. 13:22.) (What a mouthful!)

When these false priests encourage us to bless the Jews, they are actually encouraging us to promote evil, because the Jews a