IN MEMORIAM: Nord Davis, Jr., A Modern American Hero, Part One

Introduction

Today’s message is one that I have been planning for a long time. This is a tribute to one of America’s greatest unsung heroes. The reason he is unsung is because he opposed the New World Order with all of his might from the ‘50’s on. He also became one of the leading lights of the Christian Identity Movement, the movement to awaken the Anglo-Saxon Christian people of their true identity as the Biblical Israel. Unfortunately, I never met him in person, but I did have the opportunity - as did a few hundred others -- to discuss Scripture with him on the phone. Nord was always willing to talk Scripture.

Nord Davis was the tyrant’s worst nightmare: a tax protester who refused to pay taxes to the corrupt IRS, a computer programmer, a soldier of fortune, a natural health nut, a fierce defender of the citizen’s right to bear arms against both unwanted intruders and tyrannical governments, and an all-around patriotic right-wing kook. In short: MY KIND OF GUY!!!! …and I’ll bet he loved apple pie.

I was on his mailing list from the early ‘80’s and received his irregular magazines and newsletters as he was able to put them out. My own Judgment Day Perspectives is done in the same spirit; but I have the advantage of the internet which does not require the printing apparatus and having to stuff and mail envelopes to get the word out. For all the work that went into putting out a newsletter in those days, Nord Davis had to be one hell of a determined dude.

There is so much to tell about Nord Davis, Jr. that someone should write an official biography. If his long-time assistant, Betty Lou, is still alive, maybe she should do it. I’ll try to track her down and see if she is willing and able. In the meantime, for those who have never heard of Nord Davis - or know little about him - this story will truly amaze you.

EPITAPH: Here Lies Nord Davis, Jr., The Man Who Ended the Vietnam War

I don’t know if his grave marker contains the above epitaph, but it should, because Nord Davis is indeed the man who is most responsible for ending the Vietnam War. His name was never mentioned in the mainstream press, except as one of those anti-IRS, racist “haters” who denied the holocaust, proclaimed Jesus Christ, and denounced the Rothschilds, the United Nations, and the New World Order. People like this, as far as the kosher press is concerned, must be consigned to the memory hole because he was a true thorn in their side.

In the late Sixties, one of my college professors (one of those old right-wing curmudgeons), when I asked him what he thought about some of the holocaust teaching that was going on, answered and said, “History is bunk.” I didn’t believe him at the time. I asked myself: “How could such a massive edifice of lies be maintained for so many years and by so many co-conspirators?” Indeed, the history departments of all of the world’s universities would have to be complicit or lax for such a hoax to be maintained. Surely, college history books must contain an accurate record of such events. I was later to learn that history books are edited by people who are more powerful and influential than those who write the books. And once a certain religious minority was able to buy up all of the biggest publishing houses, newspapers, radio stations, movie theaters, etc., it wasn’t long before the 6 million story had become unchallengeable -- but no less a hoax.. Also, this same religious minority was able to tar dissenters with the brush of “anti-Semitism” should they point out obvious problems with the mythology of the holocaust, such as Germany’s lack of fuel to cremate six million bodies and the fact that the myth of the six million had been propounded even before WWII started. (Both of these facts are pretty good evidence that the story is a hoax.)

But I had already become familiar with many such “damned facts” about World War II which suggested that there was much to the history that wasn’t being told. For example, Allied aircraft were given orders to avoid bombing the I.G. Farben chemical plant because it was owned by the DuPont family. In an earlier era, I was aware of how John D. Rockefeller was in the habit of bribing politicians, bombing his opponent’s gas stations and hiring goons to kill striking workers. Such damned facts were gradually deleted from the textbooks as the Rockefeller family became more “influential.” Today, the Rockefellers are portrayed as “rich philanthropists.” Al Capone was a street huckster compared to Rockefeller.

I quickly learned that the best history books are those which are not part of the university curriculum. I also found that the best books on economics were written by non-academics (especially by the “hard money” school of writers who explained why the gold standard is crucial to an honest money system) or anti-establishment writers such as Ludwig von Mises (Planned Chaos and The Road To Serfdom) and Fredric Bastiat. Once you compare the straightforward arguments by such writers to the gobbledygook of the academics, you know who is telling the truth. Academia was obviously corrupt. The question was: Why and by whom? It took me a while, but I found out.

My personal experience in Vietnam as an Army grunt in 1969 told me that we were not trying to win the war. Instead of capturing territory, the US military strategy consisted of capturing small and large hills (such as the famous Hamburger Hill) and then turning around a few days later and abandoning it so that the enemy could recapture it without a fight. Then, a few weeks later, we would lose a few more men recapturing the same hill! Stupid? -- or what? It seemed obvious to me that the unions and corporations who were making big bucks off the war had begun to see the war as business as usual. Big money was being made in government contracts and few rich people wish to see the money spigots turned off. That’s why Richard Nixon had such a hard time ending the Vietnam War. Not that he really wanted to. It was just another politician’s campaign promise. And we all know what that is worth.

Thirty years later, Robert Strange McNamara, the architect of America’s no-win policy in Vietnam, admitted that “Vietnam was a mistake.” Thanks, Bob! I’m glad your mistake didn’t kill me!

It is a fact of history that, on May 8, 1972, Richard Nixon finally mined Haiphong Harbor, thus ending the shipment of millions of tons of supplies to the North Vietnamese. [Question: How was the little country of North Vietnam able to pay for all of these supplies?] The mining was a dagger in the heart of the North Vietnamese communists and their allies. At the time of the announcement I was safely at home in Chicago trying to put my Vietnam experience behind me; but it struck me as very odd that, if such a maneuver was so decisive, why wasn’t it done much sooner? If it was so easy to cut off the enemy’s main source of supplies, then why not use this tactic right away? - at the very beginning of the war!! There could have been very little resistance by the communists without these supplies. Very fishy, indeed!

Here, again, the media, just like the phony academic text books, never asked the obvious questions! Was there not a single reporter on any major newspaper capable of asking the question, “Why wasn’t Haiphong Harbor mined much sooner? So many lives could have been saved!”? Just like the “talking heads” of today’s television “news reports,” very important details were routinely left out of the coverage. I came to conclude with my college professor that, not only is history bunk, so is the daily news.

I soon realized that only the most courageous reporters ever tell the truth about economics, war, and politics. When it comes to these subjects, reporters write what they are told, not what they see. Reporters who do not follow this rule do not last long as reporters or they mysteriously die - as in the case of Dorothy Kilgallan, who wouldn’t stop digging into the JFK assassination. Other reporters got the hint.

The Reason Why Congress Did Not Declare War Against North Vietnam

One thing I clearly remember about the early days of the Vietnam War was the debate in America over whether Congress should declare war. Constitutionally, America cannot prosecute a war unless Congress declares it. The Constitution does not authorize the President to make war. Today, both the President and the Congress routinely ignore the Constitution of the United States. Instead, they seek the approval of the “international community” or the United Nations. In other words, they seek the approval of other corporate moguls who also stand to profit from war. “United Nations” is a completely deceptive misnomer. It should be the “United Corporations,” because that’s who the UN represents. This is how the UN REALLY promotes “peace” in this world. This is also called “free trade.”

Congress never did declare war. Why not? To those who are aware of how Big Business operates, with Big Banks lending money to both sides and with major corporations often selling their military wares to both sides of the conflict, it is not uncommon for such corporations to make money off both parties in the war. The Warburg family achieved this during WWI. Just as the DuPont family made money off of both sides during WWII, the Ford Motor Company helped the Soviets build the Kama River truck plant while the war was in progress. To bring this subject home for me personally: While I was dodging communist bullets and taking shrapnel hits in Vietnam, the Ford Motor Company was helping the Soviets build the trucks and tanks which were being used by the communists against me…all with the approval of the U. S. Commerce Department!

Had Congress declared war, Ford Motor Company would have been technically guilty of treason. By not declaring war, Congress let these profiteers off the hook; and that is the reason why Congress no longer declares war: because so many “American” corporations trade with the enemy. This is the reality of “international trade.” Some of the other big corporate players who were trading with the Soviets during the Vietnam War were Chase Manhattan Bank, Fiat, and Rolls-Royce. Rolls-Royce helped to build the engines for their jets. All in all, a wide variety of trade was allowed by the Commerce Department and encouraged by the State Department. Most of this trade had a direct bearing on the communist ability to make war. Such items as trucks, tanks, anti-aircraft weapons, computers, ammunition, etc. were routinely sold to the Soviets while American soldiers were in harm’s way. One of the most egregious examples of this anti-American policy was the fact that the Commerce Department okayed a deal which allowed an Illinois company to sell the Soviets ball-bearing grinding machines. At that time, the Soviets did not have such machines. These machines are crucial for guided missile systems. In other words, without these machines, the Soviets could not produce indigenous guided missile hardware! I’ll bet U.S. Army helicopter pilots would have resented this policy had they known about it!!! Talk about giving your enemy the knife with which to stab you!

At that time, the State Department was actively promoting trade with our enemy. This Department had even issued a booklet encouraging such trade. With regard to this booklet, on October 17, 1966, California Congressman G.P. Lipscomb had this to say before Congress:

“The major purpose of the booklet was to build up pressure for legislation to give most-favored-nations treatment to East European Communist nations. An ancillary purpose was to say how REALLY AWFUL the Department believes people are who try to express themselves on this issue of NOT buying Communist goods.”

Let’s see…the State Department wants to promote trade with the communists while the war is raging and it goes on record stating that those who would oppose this policy are anti-American? I don’t know what school of logic these bureaucrats learned their reasoning ability from (Yale, Harvard, Tel Aviv?), but this doesn’t make sense to me. Official policy is treason and the true patriot is condemned for his pro-American stance. If you think our government is any less treasonous today, I’ve got news for you.

For thorough documentation of corporate trade with the Soviet bloc during the Vietnam War, read Antony Sutton’s book, National Suicide. It is a real eye-opener.

With this being the official policy inherited by the Nixon administration, there was no rush to consummate the War. (The only difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Democrats kiss the Zionist’s left butt cheek while the Republicans kiss the Zionist’s right butt cheek. The history of Zionism has always been to promote communism at the expense of Western Christendom. Guess which ethnic minority has always profited the most from international conflict.) By Nixon’s time, money and trade were the real driving force of the War while the newspapers touted the whole affair in terms of “democracy versus communism.” Of course, the public must never be allowed to perceive this economic reality. The public would never assent to war if it were known that the war was being waged under false pretenses. War rhetoric always involves monstrous accusations of evil against some non-enemy who is rarely guilty of anything like what he is accused of. But giant corporations and giant banks promote war behind the scenes for their own purposes, often to recover assets lost in a particular country. Profits, oil, and other natural resources are almost always at stake. Once the government has come on board with the war plans, then the parasitic press generates reams of propaganda demonizing the new and hateful “dictatorship” that must be overthrown for the sake of “freedom.”

The key to understanding this phenomenon is to realize that international corporations no longer answer to any government entity. They are laws unto themselves, virtually immune from prosecution. “International Law” is nothing more than carte blanche for corporations to avoid national laws - laws which have been established for the benefit of the environment, the worker, fair trade, etc. And the UN is the enabler of these rapists while pretending to be our defender. Please do not forget that the UN was created by the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds, the two biggest gangster families in the world. It is a business entity that is being sold to the public as if were some kind of governmental body. It is nothing of the kind. The UN is nothing but a mind control device for duping the public into believing that it is the only hope for world peace.

There’s no telling how much longer the Vietnam War would have dragged on had Nixon not mined Haiphong Harbor. As you will soon find out, all of the credit for this mining goes to a small group of men - all of them self-proclaimed right-wing patriots whose sole motivation was to stop the senseless killing of innocent people by the war-mongers. This small group of patriots forced Nixon’s hand - most prominent among them: one Nord Davis, Jr.

Background on Nord Davis’ Publications

From about 1980 on, I was an eager recipient of Nord’s irregular publications of the “Pardon Me, But…” series and the “Off My Chest” series, of which there were 90 or more issues. These came out whenever something was really bothering Nord, and he just had to notify his following…or he had to wait for his printing press to be fixed or he had to wait for donations to catch up with demand. From Nord’s publications, I found out the name of the assassin who really shot John F. Kennedy. His name was not Oswald. Neither was this man the shooter who was on the grassy knoll, although there was a sharpshooter there also. His name is George DeMohrenschildt. According to Nord, George DeMohrenschildt was part of the CIA assassination team that performed regular duty in South America, knocking off banana republic dictators as well as duly-elected officials who didn’t comply with the New World Order.

On page 14 of his Pardon Me…but #2, first published in 1968, entitled Dallas Conspiracy, Nord states that three issues of Life Magazine (November 29, 1963, October 2, 1964, and November 25, 1966) contain various still frames of the Zapruder film which show a man dressed in a black cape [how apropos!] firing a gun at Kennedy’s limousine. He is not on the grassy knoll. He is to Kennedy’s left as Kennedy is waving to his right front. This sharpshooter is on the other side of the street, directly opposite the grassy knoll. He is either standing on the sidewalk or on the lawn just beyond the sidewalk, holding what looks like a long-barreled handgun (probably a handgun with a silencer). He appears to be no more than twenty or thirty feet away from Kennedy’s limo. A flash of light or smoke appears from the muzzle of his gun. A blow-up of one of these frames is shown in his magazine (p. 15), but it is hazy. In those days, there was no such thing as computer enhancement. These frames deserve this treatment. (If anyone reading this has an original copy of any one of those three issues of Life Magazine, please contact me. I would like to purchase it from you.)

Davis says that there were five separate bursts of fire in all. The first burst contained four rounds. Two of these rounds hit bystanders. One hit Kennedy in the chest and the fourth is the one that blew out the right rear of Kennedy’s head. The shooter may have had a silencer because he attracted little attention even though he was standing out in the open. The second burst was five rounds, one of which hit one of the motorcycle officers. The third burst contained three shots. The fourth burst was two shots, each one hitting innocent bystanders. The fifth burst contained three shots. This gives a total of 17 bullets fired. Why does the Warren Report not mention any of this?

Davis says: “Two Secret Service agents, Agent Hickey and Agent Bennett, saw the bullets hit. What is generally not known is that the affidavit of one of these agents was contrary to the conclusions of the Warren Report.” Agent Hickey reports hearing four shots, one of which struck Kennedy in the head. Agent Bennett mentions only two shots, one of which hit the President just below the right shoulder and the other which hit him in the head. The two men were in the vehicle just behind the President. The Warren Commission had the testimony of these two agents, but the commission simply ignored their testimony.

This report by Davis is well worth reading. [I still have some extra copies of Dallas Conspiracy for those who have an extra $15.00 to spare. Just email me for purchasing details.] Nord says he got most of his information about the Kennedy assassination from newspaper clippings that were sent to him by his readers.

It was from Nord that I first found out that Osama Bin Laden was a CIA asset and that the Bush family was his major business partner (and still is in 2004 with the rest of the Bin Laden family). Bin Laden and the Afghan resistance were trained by the CIA in their fight against the Soviets. Such morsels of information were not published in the kosher press until many years later. The Soviets had nearly won the fight when Ronald Reagan okayed the delivery to the Afghanis of the latest surface-to-air missiles. After that, Russian aircraft started falling from the skies like leaves off a tree. The Spotlight weekly newspaper could brag that they would break news stories one year or more before the sycophantic (butt-kissing) press was forced to report on the same subject. Readers of the Spotlight knew that political stories in the New York Times and the Washington Post were already a year or more out of date.

In the case of Nord Davis, he published information that no one else EVER reported. I never asked Nord but I assumed that he was in touch with soldiers of fortune, military men and ex-military who were personally involved in some of America’s conflicts, especially in Central America. Nord had a point of view which was always raw and direct, like the reminiscences of the guys in the trenches. Their stories made you feel the mud on their fatigues. And because many details of his stories were often verified by later news reports or patriotic exposes, I came to rely on his reports before I would trust anyone else’s. His reports were based on intelligence gathered by himself or from people who were involved in the operations - people who flew twin-engine props into the jungles, etc. He had contacts in the field. These were mostly military people, ex-intelligence and so-called “right-wing extremists” who were trying to prevent America from being taken over by the New World Order. With regard to this struggle against international tyranny, the Left Wing has been either clueless or actually working for the anti-Christ. As Lenin put it, “Liberals are useful idiots.” They are brainwashed into a knee-jerk reaction against the word ‘conspiracy.’ The irony of this knee-jerk reaction is that they will freely admit that the oil companies or other Big Business entities - even the Zionists -- routinely rob the consumer; but they will adamantly refuse to admit that there is any such thing as a conspiracy. They consider this an insult to their intelligence because their college professors have told them over and over again that “only right-wing kooks believe in conspiracy theories.” Their mantram is “Big Business is bad. Big Government is good.” Are you laughing as hard as I am? Lenin was right.

To prove how truly brainwashed these liberals are, consider the fact that liberals and Democrats routinely assume that conservatives are war-mongers. Does history actually back up this assumption? Let’s see: It was the liberal Democrat, Woodrow Wilson, who got us into World War I. It was the pro-communist Franklin Delano Roosevelt who got us into WWII. Both of these men, by the way, swore to the American people that they would keep us out of these wars. It was the Democrat, Harry Truman, who got us into the Korean War. It was the Democrat, John F. Kennedy who got us into the Vietnam War; and it was arch-liberal Lyndon Baines Johnson who expanded the war.

From the above facts, the liberal mind reaches this inescapable conclusion: the Republicans are war-mongers!

You see, brainwashing does not depend upon facts. It merely depends upon repeating, time and time again, the same old slogans until people start believing the lies, no matter how ridiculous they are.

So, with all of this in mind, who would you believe…some nutty professor at the Rockefeller-owned University of Chicago? Would you believe the Jesuits at Georgetown University where both Pat Buchanan and Bill Clinton learned their trade of “liberal versus conservative” posturing from the same Jesuit priest? Or would you believe the story told by the guy who just got back from the front?

Pardon me, but…what I have to say next is truly unbelievable.

(To Be Continued)