The Enmity, Part 3: Atlantis and Genesis 1: The Earth Recovers

By Pastor Eli James

Church of the Restoration of True Israel

Chicago, Illinois

Prologue

Here is an example of the current mind-set of orthodox “Christian scholarship,” with regard to the Book of Genesis:

'Probably, so far as I know, there is no professor of Hebrew or Old Testament at any world-class university who does not believe that the writer(s) of Genesis 1-11 intended to convey to their readers the ideas that:

(a) creation took place in a series of six days which were the same as the days of 24 hours we now experience

(b) the figures contained in the Genesis genealogies provided by simple addition a chronology from the beginning of the world up to later stages in the biblical story

(c) Noah's flood was understood to be world-wide and extinguish all human and animal life except for those in the ark.

Or, to put it negatively, the apologetic arguments which suppose the “days” of creation to be long eras of time, the figures of years not to be chronological, and the flood to be a merely local Mesopotamian flood, are not taken seriously by any such professors, as far as I know. - Professor James Barr, Regius Professor of Hebrew at the University of Oxford.

Professor Barr has illustrated the orthodox, Judeo-Christian interpretation of the opening books of Genesis. What follows herein is a series of “apologetic arguments,” which despite orthodoxy's reluctance to take them seriously, must be considered. The fact is that the above three notions rest on very shaky ground. They are opinions, not fact; and these opinions are supported neither by the archeological record nor by the Bible. They are examples of institutionalized error; dogmatic beliefs, which are not allowed to be questioned in the halls of organized religion. Since much of orthodoxy is set in concrete, Yahweh has provided us with a sledgehammer. It is the Christian Identity Movement. I may not be a professor at a “world-class university,” but neither was the Carpenter from Nazareth!!! In addition to a sledgehammer, I think I may have some dynamite in my toolbox as well!! It's time to demolish some WORLD-CLASS NONSENSE!!!

Now, for something completely different!!!!

ENJOY! - Eli

Genesis, Chapter 1: An Identity Perspective

“And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.” - Jude 6.

Before reviewing Genesis, Chapter 1, here is a fascinating account of the relationship that existed between the kings of Atlantis and the Rephaim {pronounced Reff-A-yim} of the Bible. The salient point here is that Cro-Magnon Man is to be understood as representative of the pre-historic White Race.

Here is a quotation from an article about the Cro-Magnon controversy:

Basic facts: Cro Magnon Man appeared abruptly in Europe and North Africa. He lasted from 40,000 years ago to about 12,000 years ago. The first recognized discovery of a Cro Magnon was in 1868, only 20 years before the Secret Doctrine was written.

Blavatsky quotes a man of science as saying:

On the contrary, one of the oldest types, that of the men of the sepulchral cave of Cro-Magnon, is that of a fine race, tall in stature, large in brain, and on the whole superior to many of the existing races of mankind. (SDii678)

The scientist is quite right. Skull types are known after the name of the place where they are first discovered and Cro Magnon was discovered in a cave in France. He is still considered by scientists today to be taller and larger brained than the average human living today.

The first puzzle causes these physical characteristics to be not pleasant for the anthropologist. [These physical characteristics are “too modern” for the Fable of Evolution. Take note of the next sentence. - Eli.] To fit in more gracefully with their theories, Cro Magnon should have been shorter and smaller brained than the average for humans today.

{Source: http://www.blavatsky.net/newsletters/cro_magnon.htm As you can imagine, it is very difficult, these days, to find authors who will discuss Race objectively. Even though this site is dedicated to Madam Blavatsky, the notorious occultist, the author's focus is on the scientific details of Cro-Magnon skulls, not on occultism. Note that Cro-Magnon man “disappeared” right around the time of the sinking of Atlantis, around 10,500 BC!!! - Eli}

Many in Identity have argued that Adam was the very first White Man. I cannot and do not accept this proposition. It is largely based on old science, which has reported that Caucasoid skeletons had not been found in ancient digs beneath the 4,000 BC layers. Trying to reconcile the Bible with this perceived fact, this idea made sense. But, with constantly improving dating methods and computerized models, more recent archeology tells a different story. The fact is that skeletal remains of Caucasoids have been found in digs that have been dated as early as 100,000 years old. {This is a good reference site, for its comparison of a Neanderthal skull with a Cro-Magnon skull. The rest of the site is doctrinaire evolutionism: http:// www.cartage.org.lb/ en/themes/ sciences/ LifeScience/ PhysicalAnthropology/ Human Genetic Evolution/ EarlyModern/ EarlyModern.htm } Skeletal remains of ancient Cro-Magnon, such as Kennewick Man, are proof positive that the White Race existed before Adam was formed (Gen. 2:7). I will explain the crucial significance of this fact later, when we focus our study on Genesis 2. In this essay, we will concentrate on the Earth's pre-history, leading up to Genesis 1. Then we will reconsider Genesis 1 in the light of what we have learned.

ECHOES OF ATLANTIS

Myths and Traditions of Ancient Lands

by R. Cedric Leonard

__________________________________

 

The traditions and mythologies which will be brought forward here are not intrinsically a part of Plato's account. They are separate in themselves, but will be compared to Plato's story of Atlantis to illustrate the similarities. Plato did not create a mythology when he wrote of Atlantis; rather, he repeated a tradition which had been handed down to him as "historical".

Here we will be dealing in supposition and interpretation rather than solid scientific facts. The story as related to us by Plato has seemingly mythological elements in it, just as the Old Testament contains similar elements even though it is usually thought of as basically historical. At least one of these "mythological elements" will be dealt with in detail, since it is found in both the Platonic and traditional accounts.

Again, the whole purpose of this website is to acquaint the inquirer with information that is not widely known. Therefore, be ready for some real surprises. The thrust here is specifically to compare Plato's quasi-historical account of Atlantis (including both its rise and demise) to mythologies and traditions which were in existence long before Plato, and to show how they relate to Plato's story of Atlantis.

I believe very strongly that events which actually happened gave rise to these traditions--even though they do not mention Atlantis by name--and it is the events which are important, not formalities which would satisfy scholars. The traditions and myths I am about to describe correspond so closely to details given in Plato's Atlantis narratives that mere coincidence is highly unlikely.

Egyptian Traditions

The ancient Egyptian records give us several kinds of information relating to the era of Atlantis. First of all, there is what is called the First Time, Zep Tepi, or the Golden Age, when the gods ruled. This is the time when mankind was given the elements of civilization, when the primordial darkness was banished. During Zep Tepi there were intermediaries between the gods and men, a time of the Neteru, the "Watchers", who lived on the earth with men and guided them.

Not only do we have the king-lists bequeathed to us in Greek translation by Manetho (250 B.C.), we also have direct Egyptian sources, such as the king-list engraved on the Palermo Stone (2565-2420 B.C.) and the Turin Papyrus (circa. 1300 B.C.). One of the important aspects of Manetho's king-list is that since he writes in Greek, he gives us the Greek equivalent of each Egyptian king mentioned in the lists.

After telling us that the total number of years covered by all the king-lists equals 36,525 (which, incidentally, agrees precisely with the period of Cro-Magnon Man), he continues: "the first series of princes was that of the Auritae (or the Aletae according to Sanchuniathon)." Then he lists the kings who ruled during this "reign of the gods". Here is Manetho's king-list, including the names from the Turin Papyrus on the left (there are two different kings named "Horus"):

According to Manetho the "rule of the demi-gods" immediately follows the reign of the gods (Cory, 1832). And Manetho's king-lists have been confirmed by the Egyptian sources mentioned above. (For an explanation of the omission of three kings, click on Manetho's king-list.) The important thing is that whenever the "reign of the gods" is included, Cronos (Seb) is always listed in one form or another.

Manetho is careful to point out that these first kings ruled not in Egypt itself, but rather in a foreign country. King Cronos and his connection with this Golden Age is very important in connecting up these traditions.

The Oldest Egyptian name for Cronos (Saturn) was Seb, which among the later Coptics became Repha. The latter appears in the ancient Greek translation of the Old Testament (the LXX) as "Raiphan" (Amos 5:26; modern versions use Rephan where the Amos passage is quoted in the New Testament--Acts 7:43). In any case, there is no doubt among scholars (Tyndale, 1962) that Saturn is the deity in reference--and as you know, Saturn is the Roman equivalent of Cronos.

This is in itself interesting, since the Hebrews were slaves in Egypt for hundreds of years and acquired many loan-words during that captivity. So it appears that Repha is an Egyptian loan-word, and the Hebrews' use of Rephaim (plural of Repha, usually translated "giants") is most likely a reference to the gigantic sons of Cronos--the Titans.

One of the god-kings listed in the Turin Papyrus which is omitted in our copies of Manetho's king list is the god Thoth. King Thoth is important for several different reasons. First, he is credited as being the inventor of writing; secondly, he wrote a large number of mystical works known as the Books of Thoth; and thirdly, he ruled on an island located in the west (Budge, 1960). The well-known Egyptian Book of the Dead contains some of the writings of Thoth.

Greek Mythology

Both Herodotus and Diodorus Siculus described certain "Atlantean" tribes who lived in Libya. Herodotus describes them as living in the vicinity of Mt. Atlas (History, Book IV), and Diodorus (Lib. Hist., Book III) says they lived "in the regions which lie close to the shore of the ocean." Both descriptions fit the modern North African country of Morocco. But most importantly, these very people retained traditions of a time when they were ruled by Ouranos, Cronos and Atlas.

According to Diodorus, King Ouranos married Titaea and their sons were called Titans. The most prominent among them were Cronos and Atlas. Atlas was given the regions near the shore of the ocean to rule. Cronos eventually deposed Ouranos and became their next king. (Lib. Hist., Book III) These rulers more closely resemble the "gods" of Homer and Hesiod than the Atlantean kings of Plato's account, which tells us that Diodorus did not use Plato's Atlantis narratives as a source. (Critias explains that the original king-names had first been translated into Egyptian using the meanings of the names, which the priests in turn translated into the Greek for Solon.)

Diodorus' "Atlanteans" were without doubt the survivors of the cataclysm and, finding themselves in North Africa, evidently retained memories of being ruled by the gods, "whose source was the ocean [i.e., the Atlantic]". It is more than interesting that Herodotus (450 B.C.) had already called these people "Atlanteans," and the ocean to the west of them the "Atlantis Sea" nearly a hundred years before Plato. And it is also curious that a people calling themselves "Atlanteans" happened to be living precisely in the area that survivors of such a catastrophe should be expected!

As we have seen, it is virtually impossible to separate King Cronos from Atlantis. The war waged by the Atlanteans against the nations within the Mediterranean area and the mythological War of the Titans and Olympian gods have many important parallels. In both cases it happened just before the end of the invaders' civilization. In both accounts it was Zeus who was responsible for the demise of the opposing army. Both battles ended in violent destruction and a watery conclusion.

In the Atlanteans' case it was earthquakes, cataclysmic floods, and finally subsidence. In the Titans' case, Zeus rolled up a huge ball of fire in his hands and cast it down upon the Titans. This set the forested land on fire and made the ocean boil; the hills and valleys heaved and shook in a tremendous earthquake. The Titans were imprisoned (since they could not die) in Tartaros, which the Greek poets Homer and Orpheus place beneath the waves of "Oceanos," now called the Atlantic Ocean.

In Plato's unfinished Critias, Zeus had just decided to convene a council of the gods to determine the fate of the Atlanteans; but we have already learned the result of that council from the Timaeus; i.e., after suffering tremendous earthquakes and floods, Atlantis, with all her inhabitants, was destroyed, disappearing beneath the waves of the Atlantic Ocean.

The Atlanteans were described by Plato as being in the beginning a most noble race; but slowly the godly element of their nature became diluted by the baser human side. They eventually became greedy, materialistic, and warlike. In Greek mythology, King Cronos ruled during a Golden Age, introduced agriculture, established cities and law. The Golden Age was one of abundance and peace.

Hesiod writes about the Golden Age of Cronos in his Theogeny, wherein he is principally dealing with deities; but in his Works and Days where he is describing mankind he resorts to a different set of terms. He portrays mankind as a series of "races," starting with a Golden Race, but eventually degenerating into an Iron Race. The original Golden race "lived in the time of Cronos" during the Golden Age. (Hesiod, 750 B.C.)

But, according to Hesiod, upon the demise of the Golden Race, an inferior Silver Race was then created. Later came the Bronze Race, the race of Heroes, and finally the inferior Iron Race (Hesiod, 750 B.C.). Since these are oral traditions carried down by the ancient Greeks, mostly in ballads and epic poems, no time frame is given; but the sequence as given is certainly indicative of the gradual deterioration of mankind parallel to Plato's description of the fate of the Atlantean people.

King Cronos ruled a western kingdom (called "the Saturnian continent" by Latins; Plutarch, 100 A.D.), was said to have invented agriculture, and instructed men how to live in a civilized manner. But to prevent rivals to his throne he began to kill all his own sons. Zeus (who was destined to depose him), was hid by his mother on the isle of Crete, where he grew up finally to defeat his father and rule as king of the gods (Hesiod, 735 B.C.).

The manner in which Zeus finally defeats Cronos and his Titans (the sons of Heaven) is reminiscent of the account found in the Mahabharata. After the war had continued unabated for ten years, Zeus was finally presented with "weapons" which resembled lightning, and the earth began to quake as fiery bolts flew from his hands. The vast forests were set on fire and the waters of the ocean itself "boiled and seethed" (Hesiod, 735 B.C.).

Cronos and the Titans are finally imprisoned in Tartaros, located deep beneath the ocean waves. In this passage from the Iliad (Book XIV), the queenly Hera proposes "to visit Oceanus at the far end of the earth, from whom the gods are sprung," where Zeus "had also thrust great Cronos down beneath earth and the restless sea." (Homer, 850 B.C.) Once the Titans are sealed in their infernal prison, Atlas himself is left guarding the gates, preventing a future escape--a lot of Atlantean connections here!

During the yearly festival known as the Cronia--similar to the Roman Saturnalia festival--the bound statue of Cronos was brought forth and loosed, but only for the duration of the festival. At the same time all slaves were temporarily freed, gifts exchanged, and a 7-day long party ensued during which there was drinking and merry making. Slaves were allowed to order their masters around (although the severity of such orders was tempered by the knowledge that in a few days they would again be ruled by these same masters). This was all, of course, to honor Cronos, the first great king and civilizer of mankind; but also to commemorate the defeat, binding, and imprisonment of Cronos at the end of the 10-year-long war.

Just how did Plato's Atlanteans obtain their "godly" nature to begin with? According to Plato's Critias, the god Poseidon fell in love with an earthborn girl named Cleito. He had intercourse with her (the "mythological element" of the Atlantis story), and built her a palace in Atlantis on a hill. They eventually had five sets of twins (ten princes), the eldest of which was named Atlas, for which the entire land was named Atlantis.

This "mixture" of divine and earthborn would, of course, make each of their offspring one-half divine and one-half human. The natural result of this generation mating with other earthborn women would result in only a "quarter" of the divine element, etc., etc., until eventually the divine element would become so "diluted" that the baser "human" characteristics would finally be in control. Now let's compare this scenario with another prominent body of legends.

Hebrew Records

The traditions recorded by the Hebrews parallel the above account closely. A strange, often puzzling, passage appears early in the Hebrew Bible which bears looking into at this point. In the book of Genesis one finds the following:

"And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. . . .
There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men (heroes) which were of old, men of renown." (Genesis 6:1-2,4)

Now this is basically how Plato says the Atlanteans came to be. (Remember also that Hesiod calls the Titans "sons of Heaven".) The Hebrew account even contains a reference to Plato's "dilution" of the divine element with the human: "And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh" (verse 3), after which man grows extremely wicked and is eventually destroyed by a flood. The account in the Book of Enoch mentions the earth tilting on its axis during which the earth "labours and is violently shaken." (I Enoch LXIV. 1-3)

Two of the most surprising (and mistranslated) verses in the Old Testament may actually concern Atlantis. The passage is found in the Book of Job, and in the respected King James version reads like this:

"Dead things are formed from under the waters, and the inhabitants thereof. Hell is naked before him, and destruction hath no covering." (Job 26:5-6)

An innocuous enough sounding passage: no clue here to the famous sunken land. But in reality, these verses deserve a second look. The very first word in the above passage is the Hebrew word Rephaim, a reference to the descendants of Repha! In other words, this is a direct reference to the sons of King Cronos - the famed Titans of Greek mythology. And the Hebrew verb translated "formed" should have been translated "tremble" or "writhe". What a change this makes! An informed modern translation would read:

"The Titans tremble beneath the waters and the inhabitants thereof. Hell is naked before him, and destruction hath no covering." (Job 26:5-6)

Dr. James Moffatt (1922) of Oxford University is almost poetic in his expressive rendering of the passage in question. Undoubtedly he has caught the meaning of what this is all about.

"Before him the primaeval giants writhe, under the ocean in their prison; the underworld lies open to his eyes, the nether regions are unveiled." (Job 26:5-6)

If this is not a reference to the fateful destiny of the Titans, I don't know what it is! It was the god Zeus who had won the battle (leading the Olympian gods against Cronos and the Titans), and had imprisoned them at the bottom of the ocean (Oceanos, which we now call the Atlantic). Yahweh, the Hebrew equivalent of Zeus, is said to be able to see right through the "covering" (the waters) and view "destruction" as if it were lying naked before him. Tartaros is the Greek name for this underwater prison (translated "hell" in II Peter 2:4 of the New Testament), but this term is not used in the Hebrew texts--it is not a Hebrew word. However, if there ever was a place where the Hebrews could have used a Greek loan-word in place of sheol, this was it.

The only scholarly reference I've ever seen acknowledging this ancient Hebrew concept of a special "prison" or "hell" beneath the sea is that of the famed Assyriologist Alexander Heidel. He states unequivocally that: "The Old Testament localizes the realm of the dead, or, rather, the realm of certain disembodied human spirits, within the innermost parts of the earth, below the sea." (Heidel, 1946; italics are mine.) In support of this, he quotes this same passage from the Book of Job which we have been analyzing.

The above reference to the Rephaim (giants), the descendants of Repha (Cronos), the agony of their imprisonment beneath the ocean, and the obvious reference to "destruction" covered by water is about as close as the Bible comes to mentioning the demise of Atlantis and the fate of its inhabitants.

{Source: http://www.atlantisquest.com/Myth.html }

There seems to be a faction within the Identity movement, who do not believe in the Fallen Angels. Neither do they believe that there exists a spiritual being called Satan. The most prominent of these was none other than Pastor Sheldon Emry. Although they refer to this as the “No Satan” position, I like to refer to this position as the “rationalist school of Identity.” Most of these people understand that the Jews are our adversary; but they see no need to conjure up a disembodied spirit to explain why Jews are evil. We will deal more fully with the literal Satan in Part 5. For the moment, let us consider a passage from Isaiah:

“O Lord, our God, other lords besides thee have had dominion over us; but by thee only will we make mention of thy Name. They are dead, they shall not live; they are deceased, they shall not rise: therefore hast thou visited and destroyed them, and made all their memory to perish.” - Isa. 26:13-14.

This innocuous sounding passage has a BIG SURPRISE hidden in it! It is not talking about the dead, in general. It is actually talking about a very specific group of “dead ones.” Here is what Howard Rand has to say about it:

Who were these lords? The fact that there is to be no resurrection for them, now that they are dead, indicates that they are not dead men, for all men shall rise again, at least for the judgment. The statement, “they are deceased” is worthy of close study. Young's Analytical Concordance states that the Hebrew word here translated as "deceased' is Rephaim, meaning, shades, fearful ones.

The dictionary defines “shade” as a “phantom, spirit, or ghost,” stating that the shades are the inhabitants of the nether world, or Hades, the abode of disembodied spirits. The Rephaim are therefore shades, phantoms, spirits, or ghosts. - Giants of the Darkness, Howard B. Rand, p.2.

Let us recall also the destination where Jesus went immediately after His death!

“For Christ also once suffered for our sins, a just man for sinners, that he might bring you to God, wherefore while he died in the flesh, he lives in the Spirit. [Note here that Christ is a disembodied spirit!] And he preached to the souls imprisoned in Sheol, Those who in the past were disobedient; AND in the days of Noah;” - 1 Peter 3:18-20 (Lamsa).

So, not only is Yahshua still alive as a disembodied spirit in heaven, so are the Rephaim in the abyss! Yahshua even descended into their hell to preach to them! Peter's sermon also confirms that these Rephaim were disobedient in the past (before the days of Noah) AND also in the days of Noah. So, again, we are talking about the Rephaim in pre-history.

Recalling Job 26:5:

“Dead things are formed from under the waters, and the inhabitants thereof.”

In a footnote to this verse, The Companion Bible tells us:

“The Ellipsis must be supplied thus: ‘(The place where) the Rephaim stay (which is) beneath the waters, and the things that are therein.’ This place thus answers to the other place, Sheol, the grave, in the next verse.”

By translating Rephaim as “dead things,” the KJV disguises the fact that the Bible is often directly referencing these disembodied spirits, called Rephaim, who are still very much alive in the spirit world, awaiting their final judgment, like a prisoner on death row! In addition, the Bible speaks constantly of other gods, lesser gods, angels, archangels, cherubim, demons, and spirits. There is no doubt that these non-physical beings exist in the spiritual world. Certainly, the Bible treats them as if they exist! These are not mere metaphors or messengers, as the “No-Satan” crowd argue! When Jesus talked to Legion (Matt. 8:29, Mark 5:9, Luke 8:30) and cast the demons out of the possessed and into the herd of swine, the swine reacted, violently, by running down the hill and drowning themselves in the sea! Pretty powerful metaphor!!!! The No-Satan advocates have no explanation for this effect. Some even question the legitimacy of such verses. But this is treading on dangerous ground. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of such verses in Scripture. The Bible records Yahshua's conversation with Legion as an actual event. If Jesus were not speaking with an actual demon, He would have been talking to Himself!

The rationalist school of Identity must either ignore these verses or treat them all as metaphors. Their attitude towards the invisible world is “If I can't see it, it doesn't exist.” But this is not the attitude of the Bible. On the contrary, the Bible teaches us to respect the invisible world, for all of its unseen wonders and dangers:

“For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him.” - Colossians 1:16.

Very few of the “No Satan” advocates are Paul-deniers, so here we have Paul telling us that there are powers, principalities, thrones, and dominions in BOTH the visible and invisible worlds. Just because we can't see it doesn't mean it isn't real. Scientists used to say that matter is 99% “empty space.” Now, they are telling us that it is “dark matter.” So, what are we really seeing? We are seeing exactly what Yahweh wants us to see.

When Jesus died upon the cross, He gave up “the ghost” (Matt. 27:50). Many saints “came out of the graves” and appeared unto the embodied souls of Jerusalem (Matt. 27:52-53). These “ghosts” are either real or they aren't. Obviously, the Bible treats them as if they are as real as a butcher-block table. The only difference is that they are generally invisible. But there are tines when they ARE visible, as when Moses and Elijah appeared to the Apostles (Matt. 17:1-9). Were Peter, James and John having a collective hallucination? Those who claim that the Bible does not teach about the non-physical realms of existence have a Scriptural mental block. These stories may sound like fairy tales, but the language of Scripture is very clear: These entities exist. I would venture to say that denial of these straightforward passages is tantamount to heresy. I loved Pastor Emry dearly, but I have to disagree with him on this one. (I have a feeling that, from where he is right now, in heaven, he agrees with me!!!)

Does the spirit of Satan still exist? Of course it does! If Jesus, Moses and Elijah still exist in the spirit world, why not Satan?

“And he has quickened you also who were dead because of your sins and trespasses; in which you previously walked according to the course of this world, and according to the will of the supreme ruler of the air, the SPIRIT which is active in the children of disobedience.” - Ephesians 2:1-2.

The spirit of Satan is alive and well in the Jewish people, but the Rephaim have been taken from Satan's domain. Both Peter and Jude assert that these Rephaim are confined in a hidden location, pending their upcoming judgment! That's why we aren't confronted by them on a daily basis, although I've known a few people who are!

The Great Race War Between the Nephilim and the Cro-Magnon Whites

From the foregoing, we can conclude that, pre-historically, there was a Great War between these two opposing factions. This concept is validated by virtually all of the accounts of ancient mythology. The “fallen ones,” whether in the form of gods or demi-gods, possessing superhuman strength and virility, indulged themselves in an orgy of lust and violence. Here are some more extra-Biblical examples:

In the Mahabharata, this orgy of race-mixing is spelled out in great detail. These fallen ones were apparently led by Indra, who tells his host:

Take ye on form on earth with all the hosts of the Gods. Begat ye all on bears and monkeys heroic sons, mighty and able to assume any shape, to be Vishnu's helpers...All the great Gods led by Sakra begot sons of monkeys and bears; and they all equaled their fathers in fame and strength.”

Was this an instruction to “create,” ala Dr. Moreaux, breeds of humanoid-animal worker-slaves?

It appears that part of the thrill of these sexual forays was the curiosity of finding out what kinds of creatures they could beget. The righteous warrior-sage of the Mahabharata, Yudhisthira, says of these orgiastic beings:

“Having lost his senses he is driven to cruel deeds. To lapse further into evil he cultivates miscegenation and that leads to hell. It is the first stage of evildoers.”

Miscegenation has always been the primordial first stage of evildoing! Many of the early Christian patriarchs readily acknowledged that this record is factual:

“This assumption of flesh made them subject to human lusts: being seduced by the Daughters of Men, they found themselves chained to earth, unable to resume their spiritual shapes.” - Ante-Nicene Christian Library, Vol. XVII.

“They lusted after mortal women and defiled themselves by sexual intercourse. Enoch has recorded not only their divine instructions, but also their subsequent fall from grace; before the end, they were indiscriminately enjoying virgins, matrons, men and beasts.” - Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament, Vol. II.

We will be quoting extensively from the Book of Enoch when we analyze Genesis 3. For now, it is important to understand that these Fallen Angels were disrupting Yahweh's racially specific genetic codes. These recently demoted angels engaged in these deeds in order to satisfy their own lust and also to spite Yahweh, in an attempt to destroy His natural order. We have to understand that this is one of the most dominant themes of the Bible. This is all-out WAR between the angels of light and the angels of darkness; and we Anglo-Saxon Israelites are caught in the middle. We will also find that both Nachash (the Serpent in the Garden) and Cain were predisposed to engage in race-mixing, using it as a weapon - silent genocide - against the Adamites. It is this fact, which remains unknown and unacknowledged by the vast majority of the Caucasian population, which is the primary religious and political motivation of the International Jew: to destroy the White Race by any means possible, be it war, disease or miscegenation. By deception, they have made war against us for the last 6,000 years.

In my opinion, the Titans of pre-history were the mixed offspring of the “sons of heaven” (or “sons of God” (nephilim in Hebrew) and Cro-Magnon White women, who were “fair” (meaning that they had white skin and that they were sexually desirable to these fallen ones). Thus, these Cro-Magnon White women were, on a massive scale, the literal victims of kidnapping and rape. These Nephilim were none other than Lucifer and the fallen angels that were kicked out of heaven by Yahweh. (Rev. 12:7-9.) They “fell” to earth, where the rebellion continued, taking the form of constant warfare here on earth.

In essence, these ancient stories are telling us that there was a great Race War between the Nephilim and the Cro-Magnon and how the Cro-Magnon tried to defend themselves against the Nephilim and their race-mixed offspring, the Titans, which the Bible refers to as “giants.” I'm sure that the fallen ones (Nephilim) mated with the women of the other races as well, but the Bible is the story of the white-skinned Adamites (Gen. 5:1), so there is scant information regarding the other races, except as they come into contact with the Adamites. Given this scenario, we can now understand that this great Race War is still going on today. This was clearly prophesied at Gen. 3:15.

Centuries after the catastrophe of 10,500 BC, which sank Atlantis, the two opposing sides dusted themselves off, regathered their strength, and continued the fight. When Nachash seduced Eve in the Garden, it was just another instance of “the sons of God mating with the daughters of adamkind.” The BIG DIFFERENCE, though, was that Yahweh had designed Adam and Eve to be potentially immortal. This genetic change would place the Adamites on an equal or even superior level to the Nephilim; and the Nephilim understood that such a development would mean their ultimate defeat. There was, however, one catch: This potential immortality of Adamic Man could only be sustained by maintaining their racial purity. Nachash, the “Serpent” in the Garden, knew this and wasted no time in spoiling Eve's womb and our Spirit-based DNA code. This is the true theme of Genesis, Chapter 3 and of the Bible as a whole; and this is the essence of the Two-Seedline message.

There is no doubt that both the Nephilim and the Cro-Magnon survived the catastrophe. In Genesis 6, a final wave of Nephilim appeared, causing the chaos in Noah's territory, which necessitated Noah's Flood. Before the formation of Adam and Eve, the Nephilim would have endeavored to regain their control over the other races, as the planet was recovering from the impact of the asteroid, Phaeton.

Summarizing all of the information we have at hand, here is how I integrate the Biblical record, ancient mythology, archeology and natural history into one continuous, cohesive story:

1. An archangel named Lucifer or Satan rebelled against Yahweh and was cast out of heaven, along with a group of lesser angels, who took sides with Lucifer. “There was war in heaven.” We have no way of knowing how long ago this rebellion took place, but it was evidently many eons ago.

2. At some point, Lucifer, with his host, was cast down to the earth and he became “prince of this world.”

3. The ancient myths tell us about the warfare that ensued among competing “gods,” between the Fallen Ones and the earthlings that were already here.

4. This period of social chaos came to an end with the sinking of Atlantis around 10,500 BC, a global volcanic event, which spewed billions of tons of ash into the atmosphere, simultaneously extinguishing many life forms.

5. The survivors of this catastrophe were forced to live in high-altitude caves, where diffused sunlight could break through the clouds, providing just enough light to grow some crops. Tropical and sub-tropical locales, such as the Nile River basin, Mesopotamia, and the Mediterranean basin, were initially destroyed by tidal waves, but they were not as severely affected by the volcanic dust cloud, thus permitting refugees to resettle and rebuild.

Evolutionists try to depict these cave dwellers as pre-homosapien brute beasts. On the contrary, they were probably the most intelligent survivors of a highly advanced civilization, which had just been destroyed.

With this as a background to Genesis 1, we can now look at it from different perspective.

Once upon a time

Creation Theory Versus Gap Theory

Since Genesis 1 deals with pre-historic times, it is crucial that we have an alternative scenario to the one presented to us by orthodoxy. This alternative scenario should, as much as possible, reflect our knowledge of natural history and archeology. Genesis 1 is usually thought of as a “Creation Story.” And it certainly appears that the first chapter of Genesis gives us a general picture of how the Universe was created in successive stages. There is nothing unscientific or unnatural in viewing Genesis 1 in this manner. The sequence of “creation” presented therein makes sense.

However, there is a competing theory of just what Genesis 1 is all about. Some have called it the “Two Creations.” Others call it the “Two Floods Theory.” It is also called the “Gap Theory,” which specifically postulates that there is/was a tremendous amount of time between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2. I prefer to call it the “Recovery.” This is the RECOVERY period of planet Earth from its near-destruction by an asteroid around 10,500 BC. This asteroid impact was responsible for the sinking of Atlantis and the scattering of its inhabitants to various parts of the world, especially Central America, Egypt and Sumeria. This catastrophic impact nearly destroyed all human life on this planet. Shortly, we will re-read Genesis 1, keeping both of these interpretations firmly in mind (Creation versus Recovery).

In matters of pre-history, I like to reference the works of Dr. Wesley Swift, who was extremely knowledgeable in this area. Doctor Wesley Swift has proposed the following theory:

We cited to you that the Adamic Race by Biblical History, and by accurate chronology goes back to 5500 B.C., with the period of time for their leaving the Garden area as 5400 B.C.  And the begatting of the Adamic race largely following that, with Adam living almost 800 years after that. The fact remains that the White Race is identified with earth by the history of men and of nations. And a period which starts some 5500 years before Christ places the Adamic Race about 7500 years upon the face of the earth.   The Ancient Sumerians had a basic Asiatic background, and much of their vocabulary and records and words tie them in with similarity to Asiatic philosophies, ideas, places, some of it being basically Ancient to the present Turkey before the Present Turks, existing in Ancient Asia, and down into Mesopotamia, and even finding its Ancient roots in Ancient Ur, and in the areas around the plains of Shinar. The Ancient Sumerian Dynasties reach back further than any Dynasties that are found anywhere in earth's history.

In a period of time when a great number of those were seeking to mongrelize our race, and to overthrow the structure of our racial respect, and seeking to bring about a One World Order by mixing the races, which is sheer mongrelization with integration being a basic step, it is important that men know something about races and from whence they have come. This is why we supported last week, and call on you to remember in this promise that in the thirty first chapter of Ezekiel, the Bible firmly teaches that he was to talk to the Pharaoh of Egypt and tell him that although he was a part of an Ancient Empire, which was a great Empire in the days of Eden, that the Assyrian Empire was at that time all over the world. The Assyrian Empire had racial streams that had made it so great that the trees of its Empires, and the might of the mother Empire...the Assyrian Empire was all over the earth. And the people of every race, and every known society and culture, and even the fowls of the air, and every creature of earth was under the Administration of the Assyrian Empire in the days of Eden.   Now...once you get this Biblical statement clear in your mind that the Assyrian Empire was so back in Antiquity that when Eden...which was the time of beginnings...and the Eden of Genesis which relates to the placing of Adam in the earth...that this Empire was over all the earth, it then becomes impossible in your thinking to suppose by any stretch of the imagination that Adam fathered this Empire which was already over the earth, or had anything to do with the racial stream that was already existent here.

We have advocated, and the Scripture supports from one end unto the other, the spiritual seed begotten in the heavens of the MOST HIGH, in the Spirit, and then placed in the Adamic race, to come generation after generation into the fulfillment of a developing society to build God's Kingdom as the identity of your race.

But ages before God sent the Adamic race into the world, and in the periods of time which go way back to the time when HE was blessing you according to Paul..'With all spiritual blessings, in heavenly places'...this earth had people all over it. We have shown you that in the structure of the Bible that there are numbers of people who are not from the Adamic Race. And as such we brought to your attention that when God called Abraham out of Ur of the Chaldees which city was then being reigned over by Nimrod,  who was a white man and a descendent several generations from Ham, that God called Abraham to leave this land where his father was Prime Minister, so that the white race in its purest seed, and with its highest spiritual vision would not be mongrelized and destroyed. For this would destroy the purposes which God had in earth, of establishing a Kingdom which had been begotten in the heavens...then placed in the earth for this very purpose.  Abraham believed God and obeyed HIM, and thus this strain of the white race was preserved. Down in Egypt this same strain of the white race like Enoch and Job which was existent down in Ancient Egypt in the city of ON, were continuing with prophetic fulfillment, to carry out a Destiny which God had ordained. Do not forget that Abraham who came out of the land of Ur of the Chaldees was a white man, the father of Isaac, and Jacob, and, yes, today all of the peoples of the white race which you have in the Western nations of Christian civilization today. These are Anglo Saxon, Scandinavian, Nordic, Basque, Lombard, Germanic people and have descended from these children of Jacob.

{Source: http://www.israelect.com/reference/WesleyASwift/sermons/61-07-16.htm }

Dr. Swift is telling us that the White Race was specifically created by Yahweh for the purpose of re-establishing HIS KINGDOM here on Planet Earth. Of course, Dr. Swift is talking about the descendants of Adam and Eve, our ancestors. He is talking about Adam, with a capital A; and this is indeed the story that the Bible tells from Genesis 2 to Revelation 22.

He also extends the “Assyrian” Empire back into pre-history, although he assumes that they were Asiatics, not Atlanteans or Cro-Magnons. Historians refer to this kingdom as Sumeria; and Dr. Swift is saying that Sumeria existed simultaneously with the Biblical Garden of Eden. This has to be correct, as the lists of Sumerian kings date well back into pre-history, hundreds, if not thousands, of years prior to 5,000 BC. It is quite probable that the “Land of Nod,” to the east of Eden, was the northern part of Sumeria. And included in the Sumerian king lists is none other than Sargon, which means “King Cain.”

{For the best exposition of how Cain became known as Sargon, please refer to Mrs. Sidney Bristowe's Sargon, the Magnificent. http://www.biblestudysite.com/sargon%20ebook.htm }

It is very likely, however, that the ruling caste of Sumeria were White men. This is the conclusion of L.A. Waddell, who, in his various researches, traces the origin of the Aryan Phoenicians, and their script, back to ancient Sumeria. The ancient Atlanteans were known as colonists, as were our ancient Aryan-Hebrew ancestors as well. It has always been the Aryans who have been the foremost civilizers, builders, explorers, and colonists. Nothing has changed in this regard. But there is no doubt that the Sumerians employed other races for manual labor, such as the “Blackheads,” a race that featured a short stature, hooked-nose and a receding forehead, just like today's Jews. Mrs. Bristowe's book contains photos of statues depicting these very same people.

{This website, http://www.virtualsecrets.com/sumerian.html , states that “While it is believed that the Sumerians settled what we know of as Ancient Mesopotamia after coming from the hilly country of the East, the study of their skeletal remains shows that they were not Oriental (as one would surmise) but rather Caucasian Indo-European[35].” }

According to the legend of Sargon, when Cain entered Sumeria, he became the cup-bearer to the King, whom he eventually deposed by assassination. Since he himself a half-breed, Cain/Sargon would have actively encouraged race-mixing among the people of his kingdom. He also instituted campaigns of warfare and empire building against neighboring peoples/tribes. The geological/archeological record of ancient Sumeria tells us that its cities existed well before 5500 BC and that some of these cities were rebuilt after the Flood of Noah. This is an archeological fact in Egypt as well, except that Egypt's fossil record shows no disturbance by Noah's Flood at all.

{This website contains a good synopsis of the whole Nephilim scenario down to the time of Noah: http://www.detailshere.com/annunakitonoah.htm }

For the purposes of this reconstruction of Genesis 1, the paramount consideration is that all races were definitely in existence both concurrently and prior to the drama of the Garden of Eden. Whether or not my 5-point synopsis of pre-history is accurate, this factor is true, regardless. The commonly held belief that there were no people on this planet except Adam and Eve is archeologically untenable, as modern archeological digs provide irrefutable evidence of human settlements that go far back into pre-history, proving the pre-existence of all the known races. I will further demonstrate that this belief is Biblically untenable as well. Once we compare the original Hebrew of Genesis with modern concepts of science, a completely different picture emerges. In short, the King James Version is imbued with both Jewish and Catholic dogma; and these facts must be revealed and critiqued in the light of serious scholarship.

In my opinion, the (lower case) adamites (# 119 and 120) of Genesis 1 existed before the man, Adam (upper case, #121), our first Patriarch, was “formed.” Adam, as a significantly advanced prototype, unlike the race he represented, was not “created.” (bara, Gen. 1:27.) He was formed (Gen. 2:7, yatsar: molded, formed) in Eden. We will determine the significance of this difference in Part 4. First, there are some key words, whose possible meanings must be explored and thoroughly investigated, before we can truly appreciate the scope and magnitude of Genesis, Chapter 1.

The “Beasts” of Genesis 1

In Genesis 1, the word “beast” is translated from the Hebrew chay or chayah, meaning, “alive; hence, raw (flesh); fresh (plant, water, year), strong; also (as noun, especially in the feminine singular and masculine plural) life (or living thing), whether literally or figuratively -- + age, alive, appetite, (wild) beast, company, congregation, life(-time), live(-ly), living (creature, thing), maintenance, + merry, multitude, + (be) old, quick, raw, running, springing, troop.”

As we can see, there is a wide variety of meanings to choose from, most of which center around the concept of “life,” or “living being.” Why the KJV translators chose beast is a good question, especially since that designation is preceded by nine more common meanings. Very significantly, the three highlighted words suggest beings that belong to the two-legged (bi-ped) “beast” kingdom; and we will further find that, in Genesis 1, this concept should have been included in the translation. It is also possible that the KJV translators did, indeed, understand that some of these “beasts” were humanoids. In those days, it was common for Europeans to refer to the Blacks of Africa as “savage beasts.” Many a missionary found out the hard way!!! It may just be a matter of politeness (or political correctness) that this provincial usage has faded away in the last half-century.

So, with regard to the modern usage of the word, “beast,” it is today commonly understood as implying “beast of burden,” or some non-human animal. But the Hebrew word chay does not mean “non-human.” As used in Scripture, it often refers to two-legged humanoids. Nevertheless, it seems to be the case that both the Jewish Masoretes and the KJV translators assumed that the word chay was referring exclusively to four-legged animals and lower-order animals. But this assumption is incorrect, as we will shortly see. The universally accepted belief that only Adam, Eve, and the Serpent were alive in Genesis 2 and 3 is based on this poor understanding of the word chay. When we realize that this word includes two-legged humanoids, then we can understand that the Bible is telling us that all races were created in Genesis 1. The fact that Genesis 1 does not mention the Nephilim is immaterial. The fact is that we confront one of them in Genesis, Chapter 3 and, later, a whole troop of them in Genesis, Chapter 6.

Here is what author John Knight has to say about the word beast, as it appears in the Bible:

Eight (8) different Hebrew and Greek words, behemah, b'iyr, ziyz, chay, cheyva', trephah, nephesh, and ktenos, are all translated into the one English word "beast", but they each mean different things in different contexts.  The word behemah describes "beasts" who have boils on their bodies, who have hands, who could lie down with a woman to have sex with her, who have a conscience, who are put to death for violating God's Law, who have possessions which can be sold or redeemed, who hold authority which can be taken away, who have feet, who are inhabitants of cities, who God promises to crossbreed with Israelites and Judahites [as a form of punishment - Eli], who can be hired, who are kept in tents, who can cry mightily to God, who can turn away from evil, who wear sackcloth, whose seed Jeremiah predicted would be mixed with the House of Israel, the House of Judah, and man [read: the people of the land], none of which any four legged animal on the planet is capable of.

The word chay describes "beasts" who are allowed to eat from the corners of your field, who are evil, and who can prevent Israelites from passing through the land. Only homo sapiens have such traits and capabilities to this day.  There are species of humans who are not of "Adam", which means "ruddy" or “able to blush.” Thus the word "beast" can describe only homo sapiens who are not of the Adamic [read: Caucasoid] race but who do have similar but not equal physical and intellectual traits.

{ Source: http://christianparty.net/beast.htm }

I would restate Mr. Knight's premise, simply, by saying that the Bible regularly distinguishes between adam-kind and beast-kind, even when the beast-kind are of the two-legged, humanoid variety.

From another source:

BEAST, CHAY-AH

The word "beast" appears throughout English written scriptures and often appears translated as simple "Beast," or "Beast of the Field," or "Beast of the Earth." However, three different Hebrew words are incorrectly translated into the English word BEAST in many Bible Translations, one combined Hebrew word, and one Greek word.

1. The Hebrew word CHAY-AH, which means LIFE, LIVING CREATURE, EARTH LIFE-EARTH DWELLER;

2. The Hebrew word BEHEMA, which means quadrupeds (like cattle);

3. The Hebrew word BEIR which means a BRUTE BEAST.

4. The Hebrew phrase NEPHESH CHAY-AH, means LIVING BREATHERS, it is used, of animals, both aquatic and land, as well as hu-mans (see Gen 1:24; 2:7). The common English translation of "soul" is incorrect-except when taken in the restricted sense of "one being."

5. The Greek word ZOE translated BEAST which means LIVING, LIFE, LIVING CREATURE, is the root of our English word for "Zoo".

In tracing these words through the Scriptures, it is important to note that Scripture speaks of both quadruped (four-footed) beast and biped (two-legged) beasts. If you fail to distinguish between beasts (quadruped) and beasts (biped) in the Scriptures, you have missed the truth. Of primary importance is the Hebrew word CHAY-AH, which means LIVE, LIVING CREATURE, EARTH LIFE-EARTH DWELLER. This word refers to biped (two-legged) Earth Life "beasts" or in other words a hu-man, or man-kind, as distinguished from the word "Adam" (Man).

It is interesting to note that in all of the following Scriptures we find reference to a BEAST that is biped. A (two-legged) BEAST who can talk, riot, commit adultery, co-habit with man, work in vineyards, use his hands, wear clothing, cry unto his creator and sow his seed with other races. Those who have studied the etymology of this Hebrew word CHAY-AH through the scriptures, under the English word "BEAST", know it is speaking of pre-Adamic mankind! If this truth were known and taught from the pulpits of American churches, it would stop the destructive race towards racial suicide through the mongrelizing (intermingling by miscegenation) of the races.

As you study the following scriptures and provide an honest answer to each question, perhaps the full implications of the incorrectly translated word "BEAST" will become very clear to you.

Was Joel speaking of a "beast" or field hand in Joel 2:22?

What kind of a beast do you know that wears clothing (sack-cloth) as we read in Jonah 3:8?

What kind of a beast has hands as reported in Exodus 19:13?

What type of beast is capable of mixing or "sowing" his seed with the "seed of Adam" as described in Jeremiah 31:27?

What kind of a male beast could a woman lust after and "lie down with" and cause YAHWEH to have them executed in righteous judgment? Leviticus 20:16

What kind of a female beast could a man lust after and cause a penalty of death to be decreed by YAHWEH? Leviticus 20:15

What kind of beast would have the ability to "keep the vineyard" as we find in the Song of Solomon, Chapter 1, who incidentally was Black?

What kind of a beast "cries mightily unto YAHWEH" in Jonah 3:8-10?

What kind of a beast would have "eyes full of adultery", as recorded in 2 Peter 2:12-14?

What kind of beast loves to riot in the daytime? 2 Peter 2:12-14

What kind of a beast can talk or speak? 2 Peter 2:12

What kind of a beast was made to be taken and DESTROYED? 2 Peter 2:12

SUMMARY

From these passages it is clear, that the word translated BEAST in many translations, does not refer to a quadruped (4 legged animal). The word clearly refers to Hu-man, Man-kind, a biped (2 legged Hu-man being). It is our understanding of the Hebrew, that this word CHAY-AH, clearly refers to a race of Hu-man beings. It does not refer to the Adamic race, the race of Adam (Man).

{Source: http://assemblyoftrueisrael.com/TruthPage/ThewordBeast.html }

(I also highly recommend this study, entitled “Beast With a Hand,” by Jason Blaha, to get a thorough understanding of how the word “beast” is used in Scripture. It is very simplistic to assume that the modern usage of the English beast is what determines the true meaning of the Hebrew chay. This supposed benchmark definition does not even come close to representing the Hebrew word chay, which is used in a much greater variety of senses than the English beast. http://members.libreopinion.com/phineas/abeast.htm )

From these and many other discussions of how the word “beast” is used in Scripture, it is patently obvious that the Hebrew meaning of the word chay is not to be limited to four-legged animals or lower-order “beasts.” The word chay clearly includes two-legged hominids and humanoids. Thus, the long held assumption that the word “beast,” as used in Scripture, excludes two-legged humanoids is a false assumption.

This fact will become increasingly obvious as we continue our analysis of Genesis 1 & 2. And the importance of this fact is that it disproves the naive idea that there were no human beings on this planet before Adam and Eve.

Special Creation Versus Special Selection

From the foregoing discussion of the races that existed before Adam and Eve were formed, I have come to this inescapable conclusion: Adam was not the very first White Man, as many people in Identity assume. Rather, Adam was the first adamite specifically selected by Yahweh to carry out His divine mandate here on earth. This had been logically obvious to me for some time. I had, for a long time, mistakenly assumed that the Bible does not provide any written evidence for Adam's extra-Edenic origin. But one day I was preparing a sermon on Genesis, Chapter 3 with the help of two Identity friends, and, lo and behold, we came upon Verse 23, which tells us that Adam came from a place outside of Eden. Read it for yourself. This overlooked passage affirms that Adam came from a place outside of Eden. Combined with the evidence of Chapters 1 & 2, it means that Adam was, quite possibly, not a special creation of Yahweh, but rather, a representative of an already existing race, and an individual specially selected by Yahweh for some radical alterations and for a very great and noble purpose.

By the way, the word Aryan, means “noble.” It is obvious that the Adamic Aryans had a strong sense of their noble destiny and purpose, which was surely imparted to them by their parents, Adam and Eve.

There is no doubt in my mind that the Man, Adam, was a White Man (Hebrew awdawm), divinely chosen from the existing representatives that were available, at that point in historical time, the earth being in a recuperative state of civilization, recovering from the global chaos that resulted from the sinking of Atlantis. There was, no doubt, rudimentary agriculture, as both pre-historic Egypt and Sumeria prove, but no society had yet revived the fully-developed agriculture that Atlantis was famous for. Civilization had sunk to a subsistence level of hunter-gatherers for several thousand years, and it was the Adamites who were destined - indeed, pre-destined - to restore the art and science of agriculture to the world.

What I am saying is this: that all of the races known today existed BEFORE Adam and Eve were “formed” in the Garden. The White Race, previous to the Garden, would have to have been classified in the archeological group known as Cro-Magnon. Otto Muck, in his book, Secret of Atlantis, identifies the Cro-Magnon exclusively with the racial type we know today as the American Indian. However, this is a mistake. The correct application of the word Cro-Magnon is to the White Race (Caucasoid) of that time, before Adam re-introduced agriculture into the post-Atlantean world.

The Bible clearly tells us that Yahweh formed Adam because “there was no MAN to till the ground.” (Gen. 2:5.) The fascinating thing about this statement is that it correlates well with the historic record of the reintroduction of agriculture back into society. In fact, it would be correct to say that recorded history and organized agriculture began at the same time. Without organized agriculture, and the availability of food, there can be no higher civilization. Large cities are a virtual impossibility without organized agriculture. History records, as an indisputable fact, that, before the Adamites restored agriculture to our planet, the nomadic and semi-nomadic lifestyle was the most prevalent. Nomadic life can support, at best, small settlements. Without agriculture, large societies, along with the development of the arts and sciences, are impossible. Without agriculture, only rudimentary arts and sciences are possible. The Adamites are the people who changed this planet-wide state of affairs.

Kennewick Man

It is becoming very clear that old-fashioned ideas about the racial distribution of “early man” are obsolete. Skeletons of obviously “Caucasoid” remains, up to 40,000 years of age, make the evolution-based, “out of Africa” scenario look suspicious! The fact is that the White Race has been around for untold millennia, as evidenced by recent archeological finds. Here is one researcher's perspective:

Skulls found in North America dating back to the Ice Age are few in number. Dr. Douglas W. Owsley, Division Head for Physical Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institution, has recently described the Kennewick skull, as well as certain other Ice Age American skulls, as being "long-headed and having a short face." (NovaOnline: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/first/claimowsl.html )

In this regard, it should be noticed that a number of skulls found in the Americas dating older than 12,000 B.P. are long-headed (dolichocephalic) and short-faced. This odd combination is known among physical anthropologists as "disharmonism" and is a diagnostic trait of Cro-Magnon Man. Broad-faced, round-headed (brachycephalic) skulls most likely are remains of those who entered the Americas from Asia via the Bering land bridge.

It's rapidly becoming obvious that there was no "First American". The Americas were being populated as far back as 30,000-40,000 years ago by diverse people from all over the world. Today's anthropologists are finally admitting to "a surprising degree of diversity" among ancient skeletons scattered over the two continents. "In addition, signs of violence seen in the bones would seem to indicate the presence of different and competing peoples." (Morell, 1998; Owsley & Jantz, 1997, et al.)

The proximity of the western shores of Atlantis (not to mention possible islands) to the American continent does not appear to enter the equation among most academics. But anthropological remains (bones, skulls, or nearly complete skeletons) tell us much about the kinds of people who were coming here during the Ice Age. On my Anthropology page I mentioned that Cro-Magnoid skulls had been found deep in South America--even as far south as Chile. And throughout this web site I have presented clear evidence that the particular type of man known as Cro-Magnon originated in Atlantis.

On 9 September 2004 during the international "Early Man in America Seminar" in Mexico City, an archeological team from Mexico's National Institute of Anthropology and History reported one of the most significant finds in recent American archeological history. Three well-preserved skeletons were discovered in underwater caves off the coast of the Yucatan peninsula. Archeologist Arturo Gonzalez led the dive team. The skeletons were found in 65-foot-deep water. Charcoal samples were recovered and sent to The University of California in Riverside, where they were carbon-dated at over 13,000 B.P. Such a find as this is strongly indicative of an "Atlantic" connection.

Drs. Stanford and Bradley point out important discoveries in genetics which have been made by researchers at Emory University and the Universities of Rome and Hamburg. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is inherited exclusively from the mother, normally contains four markers called haplogroups, labeled A, B, C, and D. These four are shared by 95 percent of Native Americans.

Recently, however, the genetics team identified a fifth haplogroup, called X, which is present in about 20,000 modern Native Americans, and has also been found in several pre-Columbian populations. A most interesting fact is that haplogroup X is also present in European populations but absent from Asians. The geneticists' research suggests the marker appears to have arrived in the Americas 12,000 to 34,000 years ago, not from Asia, but from Europe. (Greenberg, 1986)

In addition to the European Marker X in North America, the Araucanian natives of Chile also have significant Paleolithic Caucasian genes in them, most likely arriving from Spain 18,000-12,000 years ago. It is common for Araucanians to have curly reddish brown hair and green eyes. (Bonnichsen, Lepper, Stanford & Waters)

I have long suspected that the Araucanians of Chile might be of Cro-Magnon descent, since several Cro-Magnoid skulls have been found in that area; and I have also wondered if the language of the Araucanians is in any way related to the Berber-Ibero-Basque Language Complex. It is my hope that some linguist familiar with the native languages of South America will do a study on those languages from that point of view. We could have descendants of Ice Age Atlanteans scattered throughout the massive continent of South America.

( Source: http://www.atlantisquest.com/America.html )

(This link contains a photo of the skull of Kennewick Man. Please examine the photos and see if you can differentiate between that skull and the skull of a modern Caucasian. Although there is still disagreement among archeologists, the general consensus is that Cro-Magnon and Caucasian are either identical or closely related species. )

The fact is that the archeologist, who discovered Kennewick man, had at first assumed that the skeleton had to be a “modern” Caucasian, because the features are so remarkably “European.” Because this find tends to refute the usual assumptions about the origins of species, the PC crowd quickly moved in to try to suppress any further study of Kennewick Man. Follow these links for a good summary of the story: http://www. vanguardnewsnetwork.com/ ?p=681 , http:// www.nas.org/ publications/ sci_newslist/ 7_1/ d_kennewick_artic. htm .

Until recently, we have had only two versions of the explanation of the ascent of Man, namely, the Creationist interpretation of the Bible and the Fable of Evolution. As I have stated in the previous Chapters of the Enmity, neither of these views is acceptable, as neither conforms to natural history. As Ezra Pound put it so well: “The technique of infamy is to invent two lies and to get people arguing heatedly over which one of them is true.” Neither the Creationist nor the Evolutionary version of history is true. The Truth lies somewhere in the middle, where the Bible and Natural History agree. Since Yahweh Himself inspired the Scriptures and also formed the earth and “wrote” its history, there is no real disagreement. The disagreement is between the so-called “experts” in the opposing camps, who, in their infamy, refuse even try to make their views conform to reality.

{Links to other articles in this series:

Enmity, Part 1: http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/newsletter/2005_05_11.php

Enmity, Part 2: http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/newsletter/2008_1_7.php

Enmity, Part 6: http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/newsletter/2005_07_29.php }

Again, I assert that the White Race, in the form of Cro-Magnons associated with Atlantis, existed before our Patriarch, Adam, was formed. Taking all of the foregoing pre-history into consideration, I will now, to the best of my ability, reconstruct Genesis, Chapter 1, incorporating several pertinent facts:

1. All of the races existed BEFORE Adam and Eve were formed (thus refuting the ridiculous idea that all races came from the DNA of Adam and Eve).

2. Organized agriculture did not exist prior to Adam's formation by Yahweh.

3. Adam was formed in order to overthrow the rule of the Rephaim and to restore God's Law on this planet. Thus, Adam was formed in order to restore the order that existed before the social chaos (the clash of the Titans), which had caused the judgment/destruction of Atlantis.

We can now look at Genesis 1 in terms of a Recovery Story, as opposed to it being a Creation Story, although we will consider both views simultaneously.

Genesis, Chapter 1 (King James Version)

1 In the beginning God (Hebrew elohiym, #430) created the heaven and the earth.

First, we must note that the word God comes from the Hebrew elohiym, which is a collective singular noun. In other words, it is a word that signifies a collection of entities working in harmony, such as a band, as in “The band played on.” The Hebrew word elohiym literally means “gods.” Is Yahweh implied by this usage? Yes, He is. But the fact is that Yahweh is not the only “god” working here. Yahweh is putting all of the gods - the heavenly host - to work on the creation. As the Gospel of John explains (John 1:1-14), the first begotten “Son” was Yahshua; and the universe was created through Yahshua, so we have at least Two Entities present (the Father and the Son) before any physical creation occurred. In other words, the invisible, heavenly realms were created BEFORE any physical creation was made; and this latter creation was a collective effort of the Heavenly Host under the direction of Yahweh.

Here is how another author puts it:

The Reyshith Elohiym

The Hebrew word for God in Genesis 1:1 is Elohiym. It is the plural form of the singular Eloah. When used with the definite article it means singular supreme deity. In the Hebrew, Elohiym means rulers, judges, divine ones, or godlike ones. The Old Testament frequently applies the word Elohiym to beings that act in the capacity of creating, ruling over, and judging. These are beings who possess exceeding might, ability and divinity.”

{Source: http://www.genesisuncovered.com/thebeginning.html }

In short, the Elohiym are the Heavenly Host of spirit beings that do Yahweh's work. All of these spirit beings, taken as a totality or as a collective, are the Elohiym.

Whenever I see the construction, Yahweh Elohim (Lord God), I conceive of Yahweh, the Creator, together with His heavenly host of angels, archangels, and lesser gods/spirits/beings, all of whom possess consciousness and powers not seen by Man. This is His hierarchy of heaven, an invisible realm of beings, which we are given only rare glimpses of. I hear someone objecting, “Eli, are you advocating polytheism?” No, I am not. Monotheism only demands that we believe in ONE SUPREME BEING. The existence of a company of beings under His control is a given precept of monotheism. Otherwise, how do we explain Yahshua, the archangels, angels, etc.?

Polytheism asserts that there are possibly many gods vying for the position of Supreme Being. As an example, the Demi-Urge theory asserts that the God of Evil is equally as powerful as the God of Good. If that is the case, the Universe is in big trouble!!! It would mean that there will never be an end to strife, since neither of these two equally powerful Gods can ever vanquish the other.

Speaking to the children of Israel, Psalm 82 states:

“I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the Most High. But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.” - Verses 6 & 7.

Yahshua even quoted this verse:

“Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, ye are gods?” - John 10:34.

Although we are not there yet, our destiny is to rise above our mortal condition and become immortal, like the gods!!

The Bible regularly acknowledges the existence of many gods. For example, Ex. 15:11 states: “Who is like unto thee, O Yahweh, among the gods?” Paul affirms this multiplicity of gods, when he says, “For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth (as there be gods many and lords many), But to us there is but One God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.” - I Cor. 8:5-6.

So, with regard to Genesis 1, we must understand that this process, whether it is one of Creation of the universe or whether it means the Recovery of the planet after a monumental catastrophe, was accomplished by the Heavenly Host under the direction and authority of Yahweh, the Supreme Being. This collection of gods working with, for and through Yahweh is Elohiym. Obviously, the Hebrew word Elohiym has a much deeper and richer meaning than the English God. It conveys a universe filled with living beings under Yahweh's command. We tend to conceive of God as a single Person.

When we conceive of Yahweh “sitting on His throne” in heaven, is He all by Himself? - a lonely figure? Or is He surrounded by the heavenly host of beings?

Here is how Daniel describes the Ancient of Days, sitting on His throne:

“A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him: thousand thousands ministered unto him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him.” - Daniel 7:10.

The modern conception of God as a solitary figure, separated from His creation, is an erroneous picture. Scripture portrays the Creator as constantly surrounded by the living host of His creation. I perceive that the word God, as used by us today, does not capture the full meaning of Elohiym. My position is that the Hebrew Elohiym, like the word YHWH, should have been left untranslated. Since the word Yahweh was written out of the Scriptures and replaced by the translation LORD in almost 8,000 instances, we had forgotten His personal Name! The word Lord doesn't even come close to providing the power and majesty of the Great I AM, which means “Creator, Father, Eternal, All-Powerful,” etc. Similarly, the word God does not do justice to the Hebrew Elohiym.

Since the Sacred Name, Yahweh, has been suppressed for 2,000 years, Christianity has substituted the word God in its place. Thus, the word God, by usage, has become a reference to the Personhood of Yahweh and has been used as a singular reference to Yahweh Himself. We have grown used to the conception of God as a singular title, but this is not how the Bible uses the word Elohiym!

Bullinger puts it this way:

“God. Heb. Elohiym, pl. First occurrence connects it with creation, and denotes, by usage, the Creator in relation to His creatures…” - Companion Bible.

Yahweh is the Great Designer, while Elohiym is the Company that does the work in cooperation with the Great Designer. Creation is a team effort of spiritual beings, not a singular deity working in isolation. Obviously, the word God does not capture the full meaning of the Hebrew Elohiym, which implies a multiplicity of conscious beings working to bring about Yahweh's Will. Both words, Yahweh and Elohiym, should have been left untranslated. Thus, God would never have been erroneously substituted for Yahweh. As we will see, Genesis 1 treats Elohiym as a plural noun, or as I prefer to call it: a collective singular noun, which treats a multiplicity of beings as a Unity.

 

I must apologize for this long digression, but it is important to understand the differences between the Hebrew words versus the assumptions made by the translators. Thus, Yahweh is a singular reference to the Personhood of the Most High; but Elohiym refers to Yahweh and the Heavenly Host as a collective entity. Otherwise, Yahweh Elohiym (Lord God) would be a redundant expression.

Before getting to Verse 2, we must also understand that here is where the Gap Theory parts company with the orthodox interpretation of Genesis. In essence, the Gap Theory states that there may have been eons of time between Genesis 1:1 and Gen. 1:2. Additionally, the Gap Theory maintains that the earth itself was fully formed and functioning as a living planet, full of life and peoples, before Gen. 1:2, which says:

 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness (#2822) was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of Elohim moved upon the face of the waters.

The Gap Theory states that the phrase ' was without form' should have been rendered as “became without form.” The implication is that planet earth was, before Gen. 1:2, a fully functioning planet, and that some sort of catastrophe occurred which destroyed its form and function and rendered it “void.” Of course, if the story of Atlantis is true, it would fit the Gap Theory perfectly!!!

Pastor Bertrand Comparet also held this view. Quoting from his essay, entitled, Adam Was Not the First Man:

The many mistranslations of the King James versions obscure much of the truth. For example, Genesis 1:1-2, "In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form and void and darkness was upon the face of the deep.' In Hebrew it says, "Now the earth had become chaotic and empty.'

(See Rotherham's Emphasized Bible.) That is, some early catastrophe had wrecked the earth, which was not "without form and void' before that. This was a judgment of God on earlier civilizations, for their wickedness. Jeremiah 4:23-27 gives a vision of it. “I beheld the earth and lo, it was without form and void; and the heavens and they had no light. I beheld the mountains and, lo, they trembled and all the hills moved lightly. I beheld and, lo, there was no man and all the birds of the heavens were fled. I beheld, and lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of Yahweh and by his fierce anger. For thus had the Lord said, 'The whole land shall be desolate; yet will I not make a full end.'”

With regard to the Hebrew hayah (#1961), Strong's Exhaustive Concordance tells us, “to exist, i.e. be or become, come to pass...” If the verb in this case is active, then the use of the word “became” is justified. If it is passive, then the word “was” is justified. At this point, either one could be true.

Bullinger is also careful to cite the possibility that the active past tense is intended here, even citing 2 Peter 3:5-6 as evidence for such an interpretation: “Not created tohu - but became tohu.” - p. 3, Companion Bible.

One more citation:

On the opening page we stated that 2 Peter 3:5-7 is NOT a reference to Noah's flood. There are only two (2) places in the entire Bible where the Earth is flooded by water. One, of course, is at the time of Noah's flood (Genesis 7). The other is at Genesis 1:2 where it speaks about the condition of the Earth at the time just before God said, "Let there be light." Now, if 2 Peter 3:5-7 is not a cross-reference to Noah's flood, then it MUST be a cross-reference to Genesis 1:2 (there is no other alternative - simple logic). And if 2 Peter 3:5-7 is a cross-reference to Genesis 1:2, then the Holy Spirit is calling your attention to something very significant that millions of 'Young Earth' Creationists are blindly overlooking. Specifically, that a glorious ancient world that God created in the distant past (Genesis 1:1), had long since been utterly destroyed, plunged into deep darkness, and overflowed by a raging flood of great waters on a universal scale at the time of Genesis 1:2. The seven-days of Genesis, which follow, chronicle God's methodology of restoring the heavens and Earth and repopulating the world with living creatures, including modern man. There is a time gap between the first two verses of the Bible. It is a time gap that is obscurely declared, but not greatly detailed in the book of Genesis. It is the very first 'mystery' found in the Bible. Knowing that there is a time gap between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2, and WHY there is a time gap, will open more perfect understanding of what the Creation narrative is actually saying, and begins to cut a clear path through the confusion of conflicting theories and interpretations that have occupied the Creation/Science debate.

More on that shortly but, for now, it is very important that we first show you the Biblical clues that tell us why 2 Peter 3:5-7 is not a reference to Noah's flood.

(Source: http://www.kjvbible.org/gap_theory.html )

Paul asserts that these things are a great mystery, which will be explained in due time:

“But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained unto the world for our [Israel's] glory.” - 1 Cor. 2:7.

“- according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began.” - Romans 16:25.

The Hebrew for “without form and void” is tohu wa bohu. More detail from this next author:

The main idea behind the gap theory is, that lucifer rebelled against God and persuaded 1/3 of all the angels to rebel with him, and in attacking the throne of God, he was thrown out from God's presence, and stripped of his authority he had with God.

Genesis gives some clues as to the situation in saying that the earth was tohu wa bohu, in Isaiah God says that He did not create the earth like that, but created it to be inhabited, in other words, the earth was not tohu wa bohu in the beginning, but it became like that, which the Septuagint also states.

Some claim that the gap theory is relatively new, that Thomas Chalmers made it up to give in to that science concluded that the earth was old, but the gap theory can actually be traced back to the time of Jesus, or, as I would mean, to the time of the translating the Hebrew of Genesis to Greek, because it uses different words than the modern translations do.

The gap theory, I claim, is as old as the Bible itself, and not just a new idea.

The good thing about the gap theory is, that it gives answers to questions the other views don't deal with.

{Source: http://www.creationdays.dk/the_gap_theory.php }

The Hebrew word for “darkness” is choshek, which means both literal darkness and the darkness of misery, destruction, death, etc., so both interpretations are still distinct possibilities.

For this entire discussion of Genesis, Chapter 1, let's keep BOTH the Gap Theory and the Creation Theory in mind as we continue to read:

 3 And Elohim said, Let there be light: and there was light.

This works for both interpretations. For the Creation Theory, Light is just beginning to be created, for the First Time Ever. It is important to note that this statement is not telling us whether this Light is coming from stars or from some other source. Interestingly, the latest theory among scientists is “Dark Matter” or “Dark Energy.” This is an admission that “darkness” also is an energetic form. Whether it is visible or not depends upon the frequency and the power of the energy, so Light is a relative concept, related to the human ability to perceive certain frequency ranges of energy. We have no choice but to assume that Yahweh means that frequency range which is visible to His Children, whatever its source. Of course, “Light” can also be a reference to Consciousness and Intelligence, but Genesis 1 is talking mainly about the formation of the physical world apart from the spiritual world, so we are talking mainly about matter and energy.

For the Gap Theory, Light, in Verse 3, is re-emerging from the darkness that was caused by the chaotic destruction that made the earth “void.” From this point of view, the earth is beginning to RECOVER from the great cataclysm of 10,500 BC.

As I related in Enmity, Part 2, the catastrophe of the asteroid (Phaeton) impact was so great that the sun did not shine, according to one legend, for two hundred years!!! Thus, the sun's light was occluded by volcanic clouds for a very long time.

 4 And Elohim saw the light, that it was good (#2896): and Elohim divided (#914, badal, to separate) the light from the darkness.

Again, this phraseology works for both theories. The Hebrew word for “light,” in verses 3-15, is #216, owr, or ore, meaning “illumination.” So, it is talking about a literal illumination by rays of light.

 5 And Elohim called the light Day (#3117, yowm, literally meaning “heat of the daytime,” as distinguished from the cold nighttime), and the darkness he called Night. And the evening (#6153, ereb, meaning “dusk”) and the morning (#1242, boker, meaning “dawn,” or “early part of the day”) were the first day.

But the period of time between evening and morning is hardly 24 hours!!! It is much closer to only 12 hours, so this statement is inconclusive, if we are to assume that it means a literal period of 24 hours. Perhaps this phraseology is merely emphasizing the fact that the whole era was dominated by darkness, without achieving the full light of daytime.

The Hebrew yowm has all of the peculiarities of the English day, both of which can mean the 12-hour period of daytime or the 24-hour period of the rotation of the earth. Yowm can also mean “EON,” or “age,” as in an immeasurably long period of time. In fact, if you pronounce yowm quickly, you will see that it is the original source word for the English eon, meaning “age,” or “process of time.”

Now, this verse seems to be indisputably in favor of the 24-hour “day,” but this assumption is made nearly untenable by the fact that the sun and the stars have not yet been created!!! That event does not take place until Verse 14!! Any Creationist who argues that the “day” and “night” of Verse 5 refer to a literal 24-hour day has to explain how there can be a “day” without sunshine!!!! 2 Peter 3:8 also tells us, “Be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.” From the Creationist perspective, since no humans or other creatures yet exist to observe these stages of development, the concept of Day in Gen. 1:5 is from Yahweh's perspective, not man's perspective; so it is not unreasonable to state that these “days” are each at least one thousand years long, and possibly much longer. To insist that the “days” of Genesis 1 can only be 24-hour days is an editorial decision which is not justified by the clear alternative given to us by the Hebrew language (eon) and 2 Peter 3:8 (one thousand years).

From the Recovery viewpoint, however, this verse is very interesting. Taking the perspective of one who is standing on a planet recovering from a major catastrophe, the atmosphere would be starting to clear up, and the distinction between daytime and nighttime would become more apparent, even though the sun and stars would not yet be visible through the haze!!!! Consider the difference between the dead of night versus the “light” of the sky during a blizzard or thunderstorm. We all know how dark the atmosphere can be during such daytime conditions - and no sun is visible during such times!!!

This circumstance is not a problem for the Gap Theory, which assumes that the sun and stars were created in Verse 1. From this perspective, Verses 2 through 5 are talking about the sky and atmosphere returning to their previous, “normal” state. These verses are not necessarily talking about the creation of the Universe.

 6 And Elohim said, Let there be a firmament (#7549, raqiya) in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

The word firmament is a relic of a bygone era, that eon of time (the Dark Ages and Middle Ages) during which people thought the earth was flat. It literally means that part of the sky between outer space and the atmosphere we live in. The firmament was part of the cosmology of the Flat Earth Society, which viewed the firmament as a sort of screen or curved plane upon which the sun and stars traveled from horizon to horizon, sort of like a planetarium screen!! The King James translators, like most of the people of that time, still thought of the earth as being the center of the Universe; and they had no concept of the infinity of Space.

But the Hebrew word, raqiya, has a much more interesting meaning, namely, EXPANSE! The Hebrew word actually anticipates our modern view of unlimited SPACE, outside the atmosphere of the earth. Thus, the ancient Hebrew word describes reality much more accurately than the Medieval English word!!!! Fascinating, isn't it? What's in a translation, you ask?

Here is my translation: “And Elohim said, Let there be an expanse amid the waters, and let the waters above be divided from the waters below.”

For comparison, here is Ferrar Fenton's translation of Genesis 1:5-8:

And to the light God gave the name of Day, and to the darkness He gave the name of Night. This was the close and dawn of the FIRST AGE. God also said, “Let there be an EXPANSE between the waters, and let it be a division between the waters and the waters.” And God made the expanse, and it divided the waters which were below the expanse from the waters which were above the expanse; and that was done. And God named the expanse the Heavens. This was the close and the dawn of the Second Age.

Having no concept of the infinity of space, the KJV translators chose the word firmament instead of expanse. They chose a familiar concept over an unfamiliar concept (known versus unknown).

It is quite possible that, at that time, there was a vast amount of water in outer space, surrounding planet earth. Certain planets, such as Neptune and Saturn, have rings around them, which scientists tell us consist of ice. The first popular researcher to propose that the earth at one time had such rings of space-borne water was Isaac Newton Vail, who referred to it as the “Canopy.” It was this canopy of water in outer space that collapsed at the time of Noah, causing the torrential, worldwide rains, and thus changing our atmospheric environment forever. In Noah's territory, there was the addition of upwelling water from below. The Bible tells us that an earthquake released underground water from an aquifer; and this water greatly added to the amount of water that Noah had to deal with. (Gen. 7:11.) The rest of the world only had to deal with the collapsing canopy (the Deluge). Noah and his ark had much more water to deal with, from below as well as from above.

{For a good discussion of Vail's hypothesis, visit this link: http://www.jehovahs-witness .com/10/ 152570/1.ashx }

 7 And Elohim made the expanse, and divided the waters which were under the expanse from the waters which were above the expanse: and it was so.

Scientifically, one boundary that qualifies as a dividing line between outer space and the earth's atmosphere is the Karman line, where atmospheric pressure drops dramatically. Satellites must pass through this boundary line to go into orbit, otherwise, the friction drag will slow them down and they will plunge back to earth. But Verse 7 is talking about a dividing line between two layers of water: one above the “firmament” and one below it.

In my opinion, Vail's hypothesis is correct, for it explains the drastic changes in climate that occurred right after the Deluge. For one thing, human life spans were dramatically shortened. Ice core samples show that the atmosphere had much greater concentrations of oxygen before Noah's Flood. The Bible tells us that, before the Deluge, it never rained - at least not where Noah and his family lived. The earth was watered “by a mist,” which suggests that atmospheric humidity was very high, but also that the atmosphere was less volatile, more like a greenhouse! (Gen. 2:6.)

 8 And Elohim called the expanse Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second “day.”

Here, we have a second “day” without a sun or stars in the sky! My translation would read thus: “And the darkening and the dawning were the second eon.” This would be talking about the alternations of light and darkness in terms of stellar space, galactic events, and universal time. Since, according to the Creation viewpoint, the sun and earth do not yet exist (few Creationists seem to acknowledge this fact!), we are not talking about earthly “mornings” and “evenings.” Yahweh's “days” are at least a thousand years each.

 9 And Elohim said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.

The gradual separation of atmospheric water and planetary water from the water in outer space becomes more distinct. Or, to put it into simpler terms: the atmosphere begins to clear up!!! This development, again, fits both the Creation and Recovery interpretations.

 10 And Elohim called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and Elohim saw that it was good.

As the clouds, smoke and mist cleared, the earth's terrain and the division between land and sea became clearly demarcated. As the haze lifted, objects became more distinct and visible.

 11 And Elohim said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.

As far as I am concerned, this verse settles the question, “Which came first, the chicken or the egg?” Obviously, Yahweh designed the DNA of the chicken with reproduction of the species in mind. The prototype and its reproductive means and apparatus had to be designed simultaneously.

So far, from the Creationist viewpoint, we are talking about the logical development of interstellar space dust turning into stars and planets. From the perspective of this particular planet, we are being told that the atmosphere took shape and then continents, islands, rivers, lakes and oceans formed. Verse 11 tells us that the next step is the development of plant life.

From the Recovery viewpoint, Verse 11 is telling us that the atmosphere is now allowing enough light to get through for plants to make a full recovery.

From the Two-Seedline perspective, Verse 11 is reiterating the fact that SEED is designed to replicate itself. This is a scientific fact!!! The Hebrew word for “seed” is zera (#2233), meaning “seed, fruit, plant, sowing time, posterity.” As all farmers know, a particular type of seed produces a particular type of plant. If this were not true, no farmer would be able to predict what his crop would be!!!! Fortunately, the crops they plant don't “evolve” into hogwash! Only evolutionists know how to do that!

Another very important point is the gender of the seed. The masculine word his precedes the word seed in this verse and many others. Why? Is this usage correct?

Cruden's Complete Concordance says of his: “As the neuter possessive pronoun its was hardly come into use in 1611 when the Authorised Version (“King James Version”) was translated, the possessive his was often used where modern usage would require its.”

This fact will become very important when we consider the non-seedline interpretation of Genesis 3:15 in the upcoming Part 4. For a preview, let's consider this verse as the KJV presents it:

“And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.”

Before proceeding with this analysis, please take a moment to reread this verse with the object of deciding what the pronoun it is referring to. Once you have made up your mind, please continue.

This prophecy clearly predicts that there will be a BLOOD HATRED BETWEEN THE DESCENDANTS OF THESE TWO SEEDLINES, “between thy seed and her seed.” Some anti-seedliners actually agree with us that this means that BOTH the serpent and the woman will have offspring who have enmity towards each other, but they deny that the evil seed was implanted in Eve. They also spiritualize the conflict by saying that these “offspring” cannot be delineated into particular racial groups or particular lines of descent. They argue that it simply means that there will be perpetual conflict between “good” and “evil” people. Others generalize it even further by saying that it is only talking about the conflict “between good and evil.”

One of their arguments is that the word his, as used in “his heel,” should be read as a singular reference to the individual, Jesus Christ. They do not accept the proposition that the phrase “his seed” is a reference to the ENTIRE SEEDLINE OF THE WOMAN, instead of just to one individual, Jesus Christ. Cain murdering Abel was merely the first instance of this Enmity. Anti-seedliners simply assume that the word his, in the phrase, “his seed,” automatically means a single individual, merely because it is preceded by the personal pronoun, his. But this assumed meaning is totally contrary to how the word his is used in all of the other references to posterity, such as in Gen. 1:11, 12, and dozens of other verses. The Bible never individualizes ANY OF THESE REFERENCES TO PROGENY without actually naming the individual, such as David, where he is referred to as the “root and branch of Jesse.” (Isa. 11:1.) Without such specifically named individuals, they are always references to THE ENTIRE PROGENY, i.e., descendants.

Cruden is telling us that the word his is there because the word its had not yet come into fashion when the King James Version was translated. Hence, the correct translation of Genesis 3:15 is this: “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed [offspring, progeny, descendants] and her seed [offspring, progeny, descendants…This is the Hatfields versus the McCoys, folks. It's not the Hatfields versus Fred McCoy, all by his lonesome!!!!! Continuing:] “…It [meaning Eve's collective descendants, or progeny or seedline] shall bruise thy head…” And, indeed, True Israel has occasionally put a hurt on the Kenite Jews. The Roman Army put a hurtin' on ‘em when the Roman Army under Titus defeated them militarily and scattered them out of Jerusalem and Palestine. These “Romans” were actually true Israelites, descended from the Tribes of the Dispersion (what the KJV confusingly calls “Gentiles”)! True Israel, later known as the United States of America, bruised the head of the Jews, headquartered in the Bank of England, when we defeated them via the American Revolution. So, you see, the battle is NOT between the Serpent's descendants and only ONE of our own. The battle is between the two groups of distinct descendants. This is patently obvious.

“..and thou [the Serpent and his descendants] shalt bruise his heel.” Cruden is telling us that the correct translation is, “and thou shalt bruise ITS heel.” Here, the word its is clearly a reference to the entire seedline, not just to one Jesus Christ, as the anti-seedliners love to argue. Not understanding that the word his is often used for the word its, they jump to the conclusion that the final word, heel, in Gen. 3:15 is a singular reference to a particular person's heel, when, in fact, it is a COLLECTIVE singular usage for an entire race of descendants. “Bruise its heel” is a metaphor for being attacked from behind! The fact is that the Kenite Jews have been bruising our heels throughout history!!!! This is true by virtue of the fact that the Jewish people have always acted like the proverbial “snake in the grass,” biting our heels from behind, as they have always trailed us, by moving into our established city-states and nation-states, bringing with them their usury, debauchery, infiltration, sabotage, treason and corruption. These traits have inevitably enabled the Jews to destroy every one of our civilizations! Thus, there is a BIG DIFFERENCE between “his heel” and “its heel.” Now, we should understand that the correct meaning here is “its heel,” being a reference to the Race of Adamic Israel.

With respect to our Savior's Passion, He was bruised on practically EVERY PART OF HIS BODY, not just the heel; and His heels were, in fact, the least likely to be injured.

In these Genesis verses, the Septuagint uses the word sperma in place of ZERA for seed. The meaning of sperma should be self-evident! And the word sperma is NEVER USED TO DESIGNATE AN INDIVIDUAL!!!!! Nor is the Hebrew zera ever used to designate an individual person. Consequently, the anti-seedline position is clearly fabricated out of their ignorance of the proper usages and meanings of these words.

 12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and Elohim saw that it was good.

What was GOOD about it? Answer: The fact that these various zera were reproducing AFTER THEIR OWN KIND!!!!!! Nachash, the “Serpent” in the Garden, was a race-mixer and a hybridizer. By seducing Eve, he mixed his seed with her seed: two different kinds of seed thus produced a hybrid. His son, Cain, was also a hybridizer, as the Bible proves over and over. Cain's modern descendants, the Jews, follow in his footsteps! This point will be amply proven in Part 5, when we analyze Genesis 4.

From the 2-Seedline perspective, Verses 11 & 12 provide the first evidence for our basic teaching: that the DNA of plants and animals is designed to replicate itself, AFTER ITS OWN KIND. Nowhere does the Bible contradict this teaching. Nor does science contradict this law!! Those who believe that all races “evolved” from Adam and Eve are basing their beliefs on the false interpretations of the Masoretes and the universalistic theologians of Judeo-Christianity. I call this view “fast-track evolution,” an assumption for which there is neither Scriptural nor scientific evidence - yet this nonsense is tolerated by those who wish to promote and profit from confusion. From Verse 11 alone, the Fable of Evolution is contradicted. Ironically, those who promote the “fast-track evolution” view do not realize that they are actually advocating a form of evolution from one species to another.

Here is the plain fact of the matter: Neither view (creationism or evolution) is supported by the Bible or by scientific evidence. Both the Bible and Mendelian genetics tell the same story: DNA is designed to replicate itself. As I pointed out in Part 2, mutations tend to be infertile; and those mutations which are fertile do not result in a new species. Mutations cause adaptations, not “evolutionary advances.”

Every genome is like a computer program. It is designed to lead to a particular result. If someone changes the program, the program results in gibberish, not “improvements.” Any programmer can you tell that, if a single line of code is wrong - or if the datum is the wrong amount or the wrong type of data - the program will crash. The program is an integrated whole which is designed to produce a logical result. DNA is the very specific code, which replicates the various species that Yahweh has designed. DNA is species specific! We are not to tamper with this programming. This is a violation of His Law (Deut. 23:2).

A mutation is like an erroneous piece of code. All it can do is create an error. Usually, the program crashes. If the program manages to keep running, it will produce garbage, not intelligible information. With respect to DNA, in order for an “improvement” to occur, other parts of the organism's program must be changed in accordance with the mutation. In other words, a mutation which causes a change from a fin to a claw would also require a mutation from gills to lungs. The entire breathing apparatus of the individual specimen would have to change.

There would have to be a lengthy period during which the animal has both gill cells and lung cells, because the other organs within the body (joints, ligaments, muscles, etc.) of this specimen must adapt IN THE SAME DIRECTION as the original mutation. The lungs would have to take shape while the gills are becoming vestigial! There would have to be a membrane separating the lung cells from the gill cells, otherwise, the lung cells would fill with water every time the fish went back into the water!! The lung cells would have to have a separate system of veins and arteries while the transition was taking place! The fish with lungs would drown before the necessary changes could possibly occur!

Another example: A mutation which causes a change from an arm to a wing would also require bone density to be decreased, or the “evolutionary form” will never get off the ground. Birds have “holy bones,” meaning that their bones have numerous empty spaces in their structure to allow for a reduction in weight! Some predator would surely gobble up the “evolving” specimen before it ever had a chance to fly!!! Plus, eons of time would be required for all of these necessary wholistic shapes/shifts/changes to take place and integrate themselves into a viable mutation! No! Such inter-related changes cannot take place piecemeal or accidentally. Such changes must be DESIGNED! For higher order animals, such as mammals, an evolutionary change in one particular animal would also require the same DNA change to take place in its sex partner; and both mutated male and female cells would have to survive recombination. The recombined mutation would have to result in more than one fertile offspring. At least one offspring of each sex would be necessary for the recombination to survive into another generation. Can you begin to see where this is leading? The odds against such integrated CHANCE occurrences are STAGGERING! We have a word for such accidents. They are called freaks!! Freaks are always the exception, never the rule.

“On the face of it, the prime function of the genetic system would seem to be to resist change. Stasis and extinction are the patterns seen in fossils. Freaks of nature are shunned, such as a zebra born without stripes. Animals will often kill different-looking or different-acting offspring even if they might grow up to be stronger or faster (but how would they know?). Once in every ten million cell divisions, a cell makes a copying mistake. The chance of the mistake passing into the next generation is one in two. The odds are six to one that it will disappear by the tenth generation. According to B.F. Livingston, it would take approximately 20,000 generations, or 400,000 years, for an advantageous gene to spread among the hominid populations of the Pleistocene Era. If we are descendants of the famous Lucy, the australopithecine skull found in Ethiopia in 1974 and thought to be three million years old, then there would have been time for only seven advantageous genes to have changed. That's barely enough of a change to tell a difference, let alone make a monkey into a person.” -- Geoffrey Simmons, MD, What Darwin Didn't Know: A Doctor Dissects the Theory of Evolution, p, 305-306.

Evolutionists do not think in terms of genetics, function, or logistics. They only think in terms of changes in structure. They rarely ask the question, “How does this animal survive while it is undergoing these changes in structure?” They completely forget that the various parts of an animal are designed with a built-in synergy. They are designed to work together. When one organ fails to perform its function, all of the other organs must somehow change their function ALONG WITH THE CHANGING ORGAN. When a particular organ fails to perform its function, the other organs tend to fail along with it, because their synergistic programming is thus adversely affected. This is what we call DISEASE!! A “mutation” is, in fact, a form of disease! For this reason, evolutionary changes are not only unlikely, they are impossible. This is why there are such vast “gaps” in the fossil record. The “missing links” are missing precisely because they never existed. And if they did exist, they caused the animal to become diseased and die!

Do you get the distinct impression that I do not believe in the fable of evolution?

“Microevolution looks at adaptations that concern the survival of the fittest, not the arrival of the fittest. As Goodwin (1995) points out, 'the origin of species - Darwin's problem - remains unsolved.'” - Stephen C. Meyer, “The Origin of the Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories,” Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, Aug. 28, 2004, p. 361.

Arrival is a completely different category from survival!!! “Survival of the fittest” only means that existing species will adapt in order to survive. Adaptation is NOT the same as evolution. No evolutionist has ever demonstrated the arrival of a new species. It's all hokum and speculation. Also, numerous fossils of human and dinosaur prints have been found side by side. This is totally contrary to the Fable's “evolutionary” progression! Here's a sample: http:// en.epochtimes.com/ news/ 7-10-9/60546.html

 13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.

My proffered translation: “And the darkening and the dawning were the third eon.”

Ferrar Fenton's: “This was the close and the dawn of the third age.”

 14 And Elohim said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

Finally! We have the sun and the stars visible in the sky! Only now does it make sense to talk about a 24-hour day. Notice that the day and night have heretofore not yet been divided. Verse 4 only talked about the Light and Darkness being divided. This is prima facie evidence that Verse 4 was not talking about literal days. “Light” and “Darkness” are more general terms than “Day” and “Night.”

Given these considerations, we can say that our present solar system, which is a prerequisite for our having 24-hour periods of day and night, has not been suggested until Verse 14. Consequently, the “days” of verses 1-13 cannot possibly be literal 24-hour days. This is, quite simply, a theological mistake. The orthodox, Creationist viewpoint can only be maintained by completely ignoring the more general usage of words such as “day,” “night,” “light,” “darkness,” “evening,” and “morning.” It also ignores Peter's statement that a day with God is like a thousand years for man. Therefore, this viewpoint is narrow-minded dogma, not Biblical fact.

 15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

The stellar bodies were put into place by Elohim to provide us with light.

 16 And Elohim made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

As I have stated in my Solar Calendar studies, this is a horrible translation. Since the words “he made” and “also” are not in the original Hebrew text, whether it be the Masoretic or the Septuagint, the correct translation is:

“And Elohim made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day [the sun], and the lesser light to rule the night, the stars.”

[To find out why the Jewish Masoretes deliberately distorted this verse by adding the non-existent words to Verse 16, please refer to this document: http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/newsletter/2007_8_23.html ]

The Hebrew word here translated as light is not owr, but maowr (#3974), meaning a “luminous body,” usually understood as an object which emits light, usually shining of its own light, but it may also be used of an object which shines by reflected light. Thus, a maowr is a luminous body, which is distinguished from light itself. It is also understood, however, that non-luminous bodies, such as the moon, do not shine by their own luminosity. This is perfectly obvious whenever we witness a new moon, which is always completely dark

 17 And Elohim set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

 18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and Elohim saw that it was good.

 19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.

So, not until the fourth “day” were all of the stars set into their respective positions. From the Creation viewpoint, this would complete the cosmological construction. From the Recovery viewpoint, the atmosphere finally cleared to the point where all of these bodies could be seen once again.

 20 And Elohim said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature (#8318, sherets, meaning “a swarm”) that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.

 21 And Elohim created great whales, and every living creature (#5315, nephesh, meaning “a breathing creature”) that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and Elohim saw that it was good.

Remember, class, it was GOOD that they were reproducing AFTER THEIR OWN KIND!!!!

 22 And Elohim blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.

 23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.

 24 And Elohim said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his [ITS - Eli] kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast [chay] of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

I hope you are learning the very important lesson that the Bible stresses how living organisms should reproduce after their own kind. Most theologians gloss over this point. The Jews avoid it entirely!

Verse 24 now introduces us to the “beast of the earth.” Let us recall from earlier references that the various Hebrew words which are translated into the English beast are often references to two-legged “beasts”! In this particular instance, the word beast comes from the Hebrew chay.

With respect to our subject, here is how Biblos.com deals with several words contained in Genesis 3:20, which are very relevant to our study, including the word chay:

“And Adam called his wife's name Eve, because she was the mother of all living.” - Gen. 3:20.

And Adam
'adam  (aw-dawm')
ruddy i.e. a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.) -- another, + hypocrite, + common sort, low, man (mean, of low degree), person.

____________

called
qara'  (kaw-raw')
to call out to (i.e. properly, address by name, but used in a wide variety of applications)

____________

his wife's
'ishshah  (ish-shaw')
irregular plural, nashiym {naw-sheem'}; a woman

____________

name
shem  (shame)
an appellation, as a mark or memorial of individuality; by implication honor, authority, character -- + base, (in-)fame(-ous), named(-d), renown, report.

____________

Eve
Chavvah  (khav-vaw')
life-giver; Chavvah (or Eve), the first woman -- Eve.

____________

because she was the mother
'em  (ame)
a mother (as the bond of the family); in a wide sense (both literally and figuratively) -- dam, mother, parting.

____________

of all living
chay  (khah'-ee)
age, alive, appetite, (wild) beast, company, congregation, life(-time), live(-ly), living (creature, thing), maintenance, + merry, multitude, + (be) old, quick, raw, running, springing, troop.

Source: http://scripturetext.com/genesis/3-20.htm

Now, let's consider some of these definitions. First of all, let us throw out the universalistic interpretation of Eve being the literal mother of all races or creatures, even though it says she is the “mother of all living.” Does this include porcupines and dolphins? Obviously not! Secondly, verses 20-24 cover living creatures before adamkind, so Eve could not possibly be the mother of things that existed before she herself lived. Furthermore, it is not possible for Eve to be the mother of anything but humanoids. She is NOT the mother of any other species! The Two-Seedline position is, very simply, that Eve was mother of two kinds of living beings: Adamites and Kenites!

Understanding that the word chay can refer to all kinds of living creatures, we have to understand the context of the sentence in order to determine its exact meaning. Everyone agrees that Eve mated with Adam, so she is definitely the mother of all Adamites. Of this there is no doubt. But Genesis, Chapter 3 describes her “beguilement” by Nachash, which beguilement included sexual intercourse with this chay creature, who was Not Adam.

Eve herself states that the “Serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.” (Gen. 3:13.) The Hebrew word for beguiled is nasha (#5377), meaning “to lead astray, to delude, to seduce, beguile, deceive.” The anti-seedliners like to pretend that the definition, “to seduce,” cannot be applied to this situation, or that it is not a literal seduction! They prefer the other definitions, because seduction is a sexual act; and they cannot abide the possibility that Eve might actually have had sexual intercourse with someone other than Adam. Their whole theology is thrown up for grabs if this as admitted. However, “to seduce” is clearly one of the Hebrew meanings for nasha.

Question: “How can Eve be the mother of two different kinds of chay if she only had sex with one kind?” Fascinatingly, all Judeo-Christians assert that all of the races came through Eve; but they falsely believe that Adam had something to do with this. What the Judeo-Christians are saying is that, somehow, all of the different races came through Eve by fast-track evolution; but then subsequent matings among her offspring resulted in no further mutations into different races!! Yet, history clearly shows that Chinamen in China always produced Chinese offspring. The Blacks of Africa always produced Black offspring. Caucasians have always produced White offspring.

In addition to being unhistorical and anti-scientific, the “fast-track evolution” doctrine clearly contradicts Yahweh's teaching that all kinds should reproduce ONLY AFTER THEIR/HIS OWN KIND.

This principle has already been stated numerous times before Adam and Eve have had a chance to mate!

There are only two possibilities. 1.) Either Eve disobeyed God's Law by race-mixing or 2.) God produced all of the races through Adam and Eve. But #2 is a clear violation of God's OWN COMMANDMENT that particular kinds (“kind after kind”) should only reproduce according to their own seed. The Judeo-Christians are asserting the blasphemous proposition that Yahweh disobeys His Own Laws. Clearly, they do not understand the language of the Bible; and they have created a mountain of false and nonsensical doctrine to justify their own violations of Yahweh's Law.

{For more on the word chay, here is Nord Davis on the proper understanding of this word: http:// www. outpost-of-freedom. com/star_wars/ starwars07.htm }

“Mother of all living” is a loaded phrase. The word all [Heb. kol] cannot possibly mean “all living creatures on the earth,” since other creatures obviously lived before Eve. This would be equating her with “Mother Nature.” This much we know for sure: Eve is the literal mother of her own offspring, as in “Eve is the mother of all her living descendants.” All Adamites and Kenites have her as a common mother. We literally share her DNA, although, for the Kenites, their percentage of Eve's DNA decreases with each act of Scripturally unlawful miscegenation.

John Wesley has this comment:

3:20 God having named the man, and called him Adam, which signifies red earth, he in farther token of dominion named the woman, and called her Eve - That is, life. Adam bears the name of the dying body, Eve of the living soul. The reason of the name is here given, some think by Moses the historian, others by Adam himself, because she was - That is, was to be the mother of all living. He had called her Isha, woman, before, as a wife; here he calls her Evah, life, as a mother. Now,

1. If this was done by divine direction, it was an instance of God's favour, and, like the new naming of Abraham and Sarah, it was a seal of the covenant, and an assurance to them, that notwithstanding their sin, he had not reversed that blessing wherewith he had blessed them, Be fruitful and multiply: it was likewise a confirmation of the promise now made, that the seed of the woman, of this woman, should break the serpent's head.

2. If Adam did of himself, it was an instance of his faith in the word of God. [i.e., Gen. 3:15 - Eli]

Here is how Gen. 3:20 should have been translated:

“And Adam called his wife's name Eve [#2332, Chavva, meaning “life-giver”] because she was [to be] the mother of all [her] living [chay] descendants.”

James Moffatt, struggling with this usage of the Hebrew word kol, also chose a logical translation, which fits the facts: “The man called the name of his wife Eve (Life), because she was the mother of all living persons.” Moffatt felt compelled to add the word persons for the same reason that I chose to add the word descendants. The prevailing assumption that the word all has universal application to all living creatures is both contradicted by Scripture and by biology!!!! The word all can simply mean “all of a certain kind.” If any verse of Scripture deserves a footnote, this is it!!! The similarity between Chavvah and chay-ah is self-evident. Adam simply gave Eve a name meaning “life-giver.” Since Adam was engaged in the act of naming, we cannot jump to the conclusion that the mere act of naming her turned her into Mother Nature!!! OK? If you named your son Tree, would that mean that he has some biological relationship to trees? I would hope not! Even if he is a tree-hugger! So, let's not let an act of naming carry us into the twilight zone of excessive literalness, or excessive generalization! Some verses just aren't as significant as we would like them to be! Let's use some common sense, at least occasionally!

Now, recall that the chay-people had already been created in Genesis 1:24. If Eve is the mother of some chay descendants, as stated in Gen. 3:20 and by virtue of the seduction in Genesis, Chapter 3, Verse 6, then this is further proof that the word chay is a reference to humanoids, since her own offspring are referred to as chay! Our basic premise is vindicated, namely, that other races of people existed before Adam and Eve were placed in the Garden. The word chay INCLUDES human beings. There can no longer be any doubt about this fact.

Now we will see that Genesis 1 distinguishes between chay-kind and adamkind.

 25 And Elohim made the beast [chay] of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

OK, class, one more time: What was GOOD about it?

 26 And Elohim said, Let us [Remember, Elohim is a collective singular, meaning many taken as a whole, thus the translators use the word US here!] make man [#120, awdawm, derived from #119, also awdawm, meaning “to show blood in the face”] in our image, after our likeness [thus, only Adamkind is made in the image of Elohim/God. The chay are not]: and let them [Adamkind] have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Point #1: If Elohiym were a simple, singular noun, the translation would have to be “Let ME make man after MY image.” But it would thus be impossible to get two specimens, male and female, if this translation used the singular pronoun!!!! Hence, the KJV translators had no choice but to use us and our in this verse. Point #2: Now, who is supposed to take dominion, chay-kind or adamkind?

People have accused me of “reinventing” Scripture, because I do such thorough analyses of the original Hebrew and Greek words. I'll let you decide if my technique is legitimate or not. Previous to this technique, which I learned by reading the works of Howard Rand and Bertrand Comparet, we have had only the translations of the Jews and Judeo-Christians. Everyone should have the opportunity to compare the original meanings of the Hebrew and Greek versus how the translators chose to translate them. If the translators have failed to capture the true intent of the original authors, then this needs to be reported. All translations necessarily require a certain amount of editing, based on the translator's final decision as to which English word is chosen for the original Greek or Hebrew word. What I am doing is revealing to you how this editorial process has eliminated possible meanings. By means of these word studies, particular translations can be shown to be terribly flawed. If orthodoxy is threatened by this, they have the opportunity to rebut. In the meantime, I will continue to challenge the orthodoxy of Judeo-Christianity, which is, in my opinion, Apostasy masquerading as Christianity.

Since Christians have always assumed that the “beast of the field” and the “beast of the earth” can only be a reference to non-humanoid animals, it is no wonder that they have falsely assumed that there were only three “people” in the Garden: Adam, Eve, and the Serpent - although there are some who believe that the Serpent was a literal snake. Consequently, they have been unable to answer questions like, “Where did Cain get his wife?” “How did all the races come from Adam and Eve?” “How many people were there in the Garden?” Etc., etc., etc. Now, we should know better.

And, indeed, as the Builder Race, the Adamites have taken the lead in creating civilization. As colonizers, we have taken over the world's territory. As developers, we have built the world's greatest construction projects. As farmers, we have fed the world. We have clothed the naked, fed the hungry, healed the sick and taught the illiterate. The list goes on, including the arts, sciences, technology, political liberty, and religion. No other race of people have come even close to demonstrating such talent and ability. These are the indisputable facts that the Jews and Judeos choke on, every time an Identist utters these truths. Everybody knows that this is true, except for the brainwashed Whites who have been conditioned to deny their own heritage. And what thanks do we get for having blessed the world with our productivity? We are called “racists” for uttering the obvious Truth. But these “racists” have produced everything that the world currently enjoys, until recently, that is, as now we see it is all being corrupted by the perfidious Jew, our impersonator and adversary.

 27 So Elohim created man [#120, AWDAWM, NOT chay!] in his own image, in the image of Elohim created he him; male and female created he them.

Here, the KJV translators chose the singular pronoun instead of the plural pronoun, as in the previous verse! Why this inconsistency? I imagine that there was some heated debate going on in the library!

 28 And Elohim blessed them, and Elohim said unto them [adamkind], Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

David, an Adamic Israelite, who was very conscious of the difference between his race and that of the heathen races, confirms that it was only Adamkind that was given dominion. Let me quote Psalm 8:

“What is man [# 582, enosh, meaning “mortal man,” a reference to our fallen state, for only the Adamites fell from immortality] that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man [#120, awdawm], that thou visitest him? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels [in the Garden], and hast crowned him with glory and honor. Thou madest him [awdawm] to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet: all sheep and oxen, yea, and the beasts [chay] of the field.” - Verses 4-7.

Only the Adamites were instructed to subdue the earth and restore (replenish) the earth with more adamkind, rebuild it, and also restore the earth to its proper relationship with God and with heaven. As all of the races were recovering from the Great Catastrophe of 10,500 BC, one particular Race would take the lead (dominion) in this restoration process. God had been preparing for this for a long time…even before time began!

But there was a fallen angel by the name of Lucifer, who was aware of this plan and did not like its implications. Lucifer had already been demoted from his heavenly office. His new office was “prince of this world,” earth. But he was doing an unsatisfactory job even in this lesser office. It appears that he had a problem with Pride. Pride caused him to regard himself too highly and it also allowed him to take advantage of innocent people, whom he regarded too lightly. This fallen angel knew that Yahweh intended to depose him and replace him with an Adamite. That is the subject matter of Genesis 2 & 3.

 29 And Elohim said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

Note that verses 28 and 29 are addressed specifically to adamkind (#120). Elohiym is giving our ancestors instructions, speaking directly to them. We will find that in Genesis 2, Yahweh Himself will be doing the speaking, and the addressee will be a single Adamite.

 30 And to every beast [chay] of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.

Obviously, herbs were meant to be eaten by human beings. So, again, we find that the word chay includes humanoids among its definitions.

 31 And Elohim saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

Do you see what a big difference it makes when you understand that the non-Adamic races were already here on the earth BEFORE Adam and Eve had their confrontation with Nachash? Judeo-Christian “scholarship” has neglected to deal with the fact that the word chay includes non-Adamic humanoids. Playing right into the designs of our Adversary, such error can only lead to DISASTER for the Adamic Race, for we are clearly instructed NOT to engage in race-mixing or any other form of hybridization. (Deut. 23:2; Lev. 19:19; Lev. 20:24-26; Num. 25:6-15; Deut. 22:9; 1 Kings 11:1-3; Ezra 9:2; Neh. 10:28-37.)

Today, Satan is STILL trying to destroy us by brainwashing us into disregarding our racial heritage. If you pay close attention, all of the pro-miscegenation propaganda is directed at White Folk. That's because WE are his target. He knows that Yahweh created us in order to dethrone him. Therefore, the perfidious Jew is doing all in his power to seduce us into destroying our own DNA, through race-mixing. Is this so hard to understand? Isn't it blatantly obvious that this anti-Adamic program is one of the ultimate goals of the international Jew? Once we understand this fact, then Satan/Nachash and his brooding host of deceivers will no longer have any power over us. Satan's only weapon against us - as was true with Eve - is deception. Once these deceptive techniques are exposed, he and his earthly brood will then lose their mind control ability over you. Then, and only then, will you perceive the true meaning of Christ's words: “You shall know the Truth; and the Truth shall set you free.”

Since it is obvious that all of the races were already here on planet earth before the Garden of Eden deception took place, the orthodox interpretation of Genesis 1-4 is totally flawed. It is time to throw the Judeo-Christian version of Genesis 1-4 out the window. Feed it to the dogs. It is not worthy of human consumption. That heap of lies and fables has caused more damage to truth, justice and peace than any other teaching besides the lie that the “Jews are God's chosen people.” Once we understand that the Jews are the descendants of Cain (the evil seed of Nachash), then we will see that the prophecy of Gen. 3:15 is fully in effect at this very moment, and that the Judgment Day will be the final resolution of this conflict.

This will be Yahweh's “Final Solution.” “And in that day there shall no more be the Canaanite in the house of Yahweh of hosts.” - Zechariah 14:21.

“Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.” John 12:31.

Pastor Eli James

www.anglo-saxonisrael.com

Appendices:

For another good study dealing with the words of Genesis 1 and their significance, please go to http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/biblrace.html

Photo Comparison of Cro-Magnon and Caucasian skulls

http://tinyurl.com/aklbvn

Photo Images of modern Caucasian skulls, with comparisons to other races.

http://tinyurl.com/as2smq

Although biased towards the fable of evolution, this is an otherwise honest article about racial differences:

http://tinyurl.com/bbwtp8