WHO OR WHAT IS A JEW?

By Eli James

(Note from the Council: The following article by Eli James is an attempt to clear up the historical confusion that has developed around the meaning of the word ‘Jew.’ The basic problem is that the word ‘Jew’ is used to designate two culturally separate and distinct groups of people: Jews versus Judahites. The biblical definition of ‘Judahite’ is "a member or descendant of the tribe of Judah." Considering the repeated commandment in the Old Testament forbidding all Israelites from intermarrying with other groups, it is absurd to use the same word, ‘Jew’, to designate both a.) Judahites who were forbidden to practice intermarriage and b.) Jews who have always practiced intermarriage.

Also, the Judahites of Palestine never practiced the religion called "Judaism." Only Jews have ever practiced this religion. As the following article explains, organized Jewry falsely claims descent from the tribe of Judah and also falsely claims that their religion is the religion of the Old Testament. Considering the diametric opposition of these two cultures, it is absurd and confusing to use one word, ‘Jew’, to refer to both groups. All Christian Israelite groups are encouraged, therefore, to refer to the true Judahites as Judah, Judahite, or House of Judah and to refer to the false Judahites (Jews) as Jews, Jewry, or the House of Edom. The sooner our people stop using confused and deliberately misleading language, the sooner we will understand our true heritage.

"…and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews [sic], and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan." – Rev. 2:9

"Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews [sic], and are not, but do lie..." – Rev. 3:9.

From Strong’s Concordance, the word here translated as "Jews" is, in the original Greek, ‘Iouda,’ which comes from the Hebrew, ‘Yehuda.’ Both of these words designate a member or members of the tribe of Judah, and no one else. It is impossible to understand the meaning of Rev. 2:9 and Rev. 3:9, and numerous other verses of the Bible, until it is understood that there is a cultural group that is impersonating Judah for purposes of deception. Hence, the proper distinction between the words ‘Judahite’ and ‘Jew’ should always be borne in mind to avoid confusion.)

For all of the members of the Anglo-Saxon Israel nation, I am delivering this message in order to clarify the meaning of the word ‘Jew.’ This is probably the most abused word in history because the rabbis of the religion of Judaism have used it to create confusion among "the Gentiles" for two thousand years. I will cite two recent articles: one from a respected Christian Identity journal and one from a revisionist journal. Those of us who have devoted our lives to the service of Jesus Christ and to the exposure of the lies and deceptions of the International Zionist Banking Mafia must understand precisely who and what the anti-Christ is so that we do not judge wrongly either history or the present world turmoil, especially since our current President, George W. Bush (Bush 43), is maneuvering our country into an all-out war against so-called terrorism.

We must be sure that we are on God’s side and not deceived into taking the side of Lucifer, Satan, and the anti-Christ.

In the February 2002 issue of "Thy Kingdom Come," a Christian Identity publication affiliated with the British Israel movement, there is contained an article entitled "Can We Learn From the First Advent?" by Brooks Alden. On the whole, this was a very good article, especially in clarifying that the 70-weeks prophecy of Daniel was fulfilled by Jesus Christ. I have always doubted the theory that only 69 weeks were fulfilled and that the last week would occur during the end times. Brooks Alden is to be commended for excellent research and analysis.

I have a major problem with the way Brooks uses the term ‘Jew’, however. It shows a distinct lack of understanding of who the Jews are and what their origin is. For example, Brooks states "...the Jews (a small percentage of the Judahites, Benjamites, & Levites) were to spend 62 weeks [of years] or 434 years awaiting the Messiah."

There is no way that the term ‘Jew’ can be used to identify any Judahites or other Israelites unless those same Israelites practiced the religion of Judaism. The true, biblical and proper designation for this group is the "House of Judah."

Judaism did not emerge as a distinct religion until about 150 years before the time of Christ. Uncircumcised scribes from the nearby Edomite nation of Idumea had been employed by Judahite kings to keep records for some time before this; and it is almost a certainty that among these Idumeans lived a remnant of the nation of the Amelekites, who were the fiercest enemies of the tribes of Israel throughout our biblical history. The Amelekites were known to the Egyptians as the Hyksos. It was the Hyksos who invaded Egypt and set up operations at the trade route crossroads in northern Egypt, thus cutting off true Egypt from its northern and eastern trading avenues. It was among these Amelekites that the order of scribes emerged, for their job was to keep trade records as well as to regulate weights and measures. The Hyksos tried to conquer Egypt by dominating its trade (just as the Jews are doing to the United States today). But the Egyptians finally expelled them after a period of 70 years.

During the Hyksos period, these proto-Jews (Edomites who had not yet developed the religion called Judaism) took upon themselves Egyptian customs and dress in order to fool the various traders in the passing caravans into believing that they were the true representatives of the Egyptian rulers while the native Egyptians who ruled to the south were prevented from moving north toward the mouth of the Nile River. From this perspective, it is clear that the so-called Hyksos Kings were not an Egyptian dynasty. Rather, they were an invading force who used commerce plus political and religious intrigue in order to overthrow a legitimate Egyptian dynasty.

After the ejection of these Amelekites from Egypt, they were forced to travel north into what is today southern Palestine; and there they merged back with their other Edomite brethren, the Idumeans. It was during the Hyksos Pretension that the order of Edomite scribes developed into a powerful political force. Just as today’s accountants are so important to Big Business and International Commerce, the scribes of that time were crucial to the conduct of trade. And, just as the Enron scandal proved, accountants and record-keepers can be bribed or intimidated into keeping deceptive records.

After the ejection of the Hyksos from Egypt, it was, therefore, not at all uncommon for these scribes – who needed work, after all – to hire out their services to neighboring nations; and their close proximity to the nation of Judah practically guaranteed that they would eventually find employment there. This is exactly what happened.

It was during the reign of the Judahite king Onias IV, around 150 B.C., that the sect of Pharisees began to assert themselves over the Essenes and the Sadducees. Onias IV was succeeded by King Jonathan and King Simon. The following monarch, King John Hyrcanus (Hyrcanus II) solidified the Pharisees’ power by annexing the entire nation of Idumea and forcing them to submit to circumcision. This act was in total defiance of God’s Law, which demanded that all Israelites refrain from mixing their seed with that of non-Israelites. Judah, as an Israelite tribe, was also subject to that Commandment against fornication.

Thus, the Kingdom of Judah became the combined Kingdom of Judah and Idumea, and the mixing of their seed became tolerated, although this occurred primarily in the City of Jerusalem and rarely in the countryside where the farmers and shepherds of Judah and Benjamin had little social interaction with the Idumeans. (Just like modern Jews today, the proto-Jews of Judea preferred to live in the cities). Previous to this infusion of non-Semitic stock into Judahite blood, there was no wholesale mixing of Judahite blood and Edomite blood. John Hyrcanus changed all that.

The Idumean scribes gradually found themselves thrust into the company of the Pharisees, who had been put in charge of the religious life of the Kingdom of Judah. It was at this point that the scribes and Pharisees formed an alliance which would change the Kingdom of Judah forever. The Pharisees began accepting non-Judahite members from Idumea and so began the corruption of the priesthood in Judah. The scribes and Pharisees, together, dominated the religious and economic life of the Kingdom and eventually became powerful enough to impose their anti-Mosaic teachings upon the Judahites, which teaching included the race-mixing of the Pharisees.

Pay attention here, O Israel: It is their tradition which Jesus Christ calls "the tradition of the elders," which he condemns in all four Gospels as the "synagogue of Satan." Although some elements of Judaism may have come back from Babylon after the Babylonian captivity (roughly 500 B.C.), it was primarily the scribes and Pharisees who made up their self-serving doctrine based on Edomite exploitational economics and Babylonian pagan religion. This culture existed in varied forms among all of the Canaanite and Edomite peoples that lived in the regions from Babylon to Palestine. This body of Edomite doctrine was gradually added to the Hebrew Torah (Mosaic Law) and it was thereby corrupted. This religion is today known as Judaism.

When Herod was appointed King of Judea by Rome, he was the first non-Judahite king of Judea. He was an Idumean. His first act was to slaughter all of the members of the Sanhedrin, both Judahite and Idumean, so as to purge the Sanhedrin of Judahites and replace them only with Idumeans. Just as Josef Stalin purged his administration of disloyal Jews only to replace them with Jews he felt he could trust, Herod "liquidated" those Idumeans who might have gotten too friendly with the Judahites. Taking no chances, he murdered them all.

It was during this era of the merging of Judahites and Idumeans that the confusion between these two groups of people began to develop; and the rabbis of Judaism, who are accurately called "Jews," began pretending to be Judahites. Even today, one of the requirements of being a Jewish male is the rite of circumcision. Circumcision is not a requirement for Christian Israel because that was one of the rites (among many priestly rites) which was abolished by the New Covenant and the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. The purpose of circumcision was to enable Israelite women to assure themselves that they had married an Israelite man, since no other ethnic group had ever practiced such a rite. Since non-Israelites were now practicing the same rite, circumcision could no longer guarantee that she would be marrying a pure-blooded Israelite. Circumcision, practically speaking, became useless.

From all of the above history, it is therefore axiomatic that the term ‘Jew’ should never be applied to any Israelites or Judahites prior to 150 B.C. and then only to those who specifically practiced the doctrine of the scribes and Pharisees. It is very important that our language be precise so as not to confuse Judahites who practiced the Mosaic Law with Jews who practiced "the leaven of the Pharisees." (Luke, 12:1.) The remnant who returned from Babylon were Judahites, not Jews. A Judahite is a full-blooded member of the tribe of Judah. Both Nehemiah and Ezra record that their ranks were purged of half-breeds and all of their half-breed wives and children were banished to Idumea. Only pure-blooded Judahites were left to rebuild the city walls and the temple. This may seem to be a minor point but we must realize that the rabbis hope to keep us in a state of confusion (‘Babylon’ means confusion) about the origins of Judaism; and anything that is good for them is bad for True Israel.

In addition, the proper term for the nation of the Judahites before the Pharisaic period is, simply, "Judah," or "the land of Judah." Let us make this statement as if our spiritual lives depend upon it: The Judahites NEVER referred to themsleves with the generic word, ‘Jew.’

The application of the term ‘Jew’ to these pre-Pharisaic Judahites is always erroneous because these Judahites never practiced the relgion called Judaism. After the Pharisaic period was in full swing, outsiders such as the Greeks and Romans began referring to the land of Judah as "Judea." Just as America’s Indians never referred to themselves as "Indians," neither did the Judahites refer to themselves as "Jews." It is silly and preposterous for us to make this mistake knowing full well that the Jews are neither Judahites by race nor religion. ‘Jew’ and ‘Judahite’ are not equivalent; therefore, the word ‘Jew’ should never be applied to anyone who is a pure-blooded Judahite. The fact that historians use the word retroactively to apply to pre-Pharisaic Judahites is a horrible mistake of scholarship and a Pharisaic tradition which is promoted by the anti-Christ in the interests of Zionism. We, as Yahweh’s True Israel people, should begin to correct this mistake in faulty language immediately.

There are only three possible defintions of the word ‘Jew:’ 1. Jewry; 2. those who practice the religion called Judaism; and 3. a Judean.

Definition #1: Jewry refers to the ethnic minority which is controlled by the rabbis of Judaism, though they may or may not be religious. Today, this group consists of the Sephardic Jews of Edomite origin and the Ashkenazi Jews of Khazar origin. Note that neither of these groups is of Shemitic origin, which makes their use of the term ’anti-Semitism’ farcical as well. The rabbis, thinking that we are as stupid as we are good-natured, have been fooling us for 2,000 years. Within these two groups, the Sephardim and the Ashkenazim, the number of pure-blooded Judahites is zero. The fact that either of these groups might occasionally intermarry with true Judahites does not make them Israelites. They are still impostors.

Definition #2 is self-evident. It is important to state, however, that Judaism is NOT a continuation of the heritage of the Hebrew Bible. If someone plagiarizes your work, claims it as his own and signs his name to it, does that make it his? Judaism is no more of Hebrew heritage than Martin Luther King, the plagiarist, is of Britain and Shakespeare.

Definition #3 refers to those people, irrespective of their religion or ethnic origin, who lived in Judea after the nation became known not as Judah but as Judea. By this time, the Mosaic Law had been all but wiped out by the scribes and Pharisees and defiled by their own tradition. Again, this was more true of the City of Jerusalem than it was of the people of the countryside. Although Bethlehem was only a few miles away, it was not nearly as corrupted as the City itself. And it was even less true of the Benjamites, whose country, the land of Benjamin, was never converted to Judaism. It is biblical and historical fact that all of the Apostles, except Judas, were Benjamites who never practiced Judaism. Judas was most probably either a traitorous Judahite or a mixed-breed Judahite/Idumean. His surname, Iscariot, is a reference to his home town of Kerioth, which was located at the southern border of Judah, the border of Idumea. Iscariot means, therefore, "of Kerioth." He was Judas of Kerioth.

The name change from ‘Judah’ to ‘Judea’ was prompted by the fact that the nation was becoming less and less Judahite and more and more Idumean, just as America today is becoming less and less Christian and more and more Pharisaic. ‘Jewmerica’ might be a fitting retroactive nomen, after they have again fabricated history by taking credit for the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution and declaring that ours was always a unversalist, pro-Zionist nation denying the divinity of Jesus Christ.

The rabbis have profited enormously from this confusion between ‘Judahite’ and ‘Jew’ for centuries. The Pharisees knew perfectly well that they were not true Judahites, but Idumeans who had adopted some Mosaic customs while promoting their own religion, Judaism. The four Gospels are replete with evidence that the scribes and Pharisees neither practiced the Mosaic Law nor were they Israelites of the tribe of Judah. Jesus says so repeatedly, for example, when He says "Ye are not of my sheep," and "Ye are of your father, devil." And He distinguished between the Mosaic Law and Judaism by calling the latter "the traditions of men" and "the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy." Judaism and Mosaism are as different as night and day. The rabbis know this also, but their historic masquerade as Israel demands that they pretend 1.) to be Judahites and 2.) that Judaism is a continuation of the Old Testament. Both ideas are absolutely false, just like the hoaxacaust of WWII. It is paramount for the goals of the anti-Christ Talmudic rabbis that this confusion be carried on into eternity, as is their intent (or as long as Yahweh allows it to exist).

As for us, we should know better than to allow ourselves to play Jewish games. For clarity’s sake, and to avoid promoting Jewish myths about their origins, the word ‘Jew’ should never be used to refer to Mosaic Law Judahites. Even more certainly, the term should never be used to refer to Israelites, because the House of Israel, along with a large percentage of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, had been deported 550 years before, and they had no part in the events of Judea just before and during the time of Christ. This is why Jesus told his disciples not to preach to the local unbelievers but said, instead, "Go ye rather to the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel." This is exactly what the Apostles did, going to Asia Minor, Europe and Britain, where the Ten Lost Tribes had already heard of the Messiah. The Ten Lost Tribes should actually be referred to as the Twelve Lost Tribes because they had such a large contingent of Judah and Benjamin that accompanied them at the time of this captivity by Assyria. For further proof of this, note that the Book of James begins with the words, "To the twelve tribes scattered abroad." James knew who his brethren were.

Later on in the same article Brooks Alden refers to the prophet Daniel’s people as "Jews." These are the Judahites of the Babylonian Captivity. This assignation is also incorrect for all the reasons cited in the paragraphs above. They were Judahites who never practiced the religion called Judaism. This is all simply to say that if you don’t know the difference between a Jew and a Judahite, then you can hardly discuss our history with any accuracy.

I hope this explanation is clear so that the Jews, who falsely claim to be Israelites and Judahites, are never given by us what they are trying to steal from us. Let us know exactly who we are and exactly what the enemy is. Certainly, no modern rabbi would ever be able to contradict the facts of this proof, since they are the literal blood and philosophical descendants of the scribes and Pharisees; and they live in fear of the public learning this truth!

In order to demonstrate how the modern rabbi perpetuates this charade, I have included a critique of an article contained in a recent issue of the Barnes Review, September/October 2002.

In all fairness, rather than condemn the Barnes Review for publishing the views of an anti-Christ rabbi, I will compliment them for their commitment to freedom of speech. Would that Judaism and Zionism promote the same freedom of speech when it comes to our right to publicly criticize those two institutions. For those of us who know the truth, Judaism and Zionism are the two most notorious misinformation outlets the world has ever known. Lies and deception are their business, as is proven by this article in the Barnes Review, in which a supposedly "anti-Zionist" rabbi addresses a group of revisionist historians.

First of all, for a rabbi to be "anti-Zionist" is a non-sequitur because Judaism is a chauvinistic religion whose aim is to promote Jewry over the goyim of the world. If Rabbi Weiss disagrees with Zionism, it is not because the roots of Zionism cannot be found within the Talmud, Judaism’s "holy" book. Rabbi Weiss’s Judaism is just as chauvinistic as that of any Zionist. The only difference is that his particular expression of Judaism is not as rich or as powerful as that of Zionism. He and his organiztion, Neturei Karta, believe in the old-school ghetto-style Judaism of the Middle Ages. So, in reality, his dispute with Zionism is parochial, not philosophical.

The proof of this statement is the fact that Judaism uses the Talmud to justify its claims to religious and cultural superiority, just as Zionism does. All of Rabbi Weiss’s talk of Torah morality pales in comparison to the chauvinism of the Talmud. There is no such thing as a rabbi who does not follow the Talmud; and the Talmud is the historically compiled opinions of all rabbis from the time of their expulsion from Jerusalem (70 A.D.) to the present. If you do not have access to the Talmud, then just read the four Gospels to get the gist of Jesus’ objections to their tradition.

The fact that Zionism holds sway over the minds of 95% of Jews (Rabbi Weiss’s figure) tells us something about Judaism itself. The "good" Rabbi explains that Zionism emerged because of the frustration of 1900 hundred years of Jewish exile; but surely this is an incomplete explanation. The fact is that Zionism is philosophically compatible with Talmudic (Orthodox) Judaism. It is the Jewish will to power coupled with Rothschild money which gave power-hungry Jews the nerve and resources to become violent and bold enough to challenge the Christian West. This violence would never have emerged were it not for 1900 years of rabbinical propaganda – keeping the Jewish version of the Messianic dream alive while keeping the flocks penned up in the ghettoes. If there was frustration, whose fault is it? Why are so many Jews neurotic basket-cases if not because of their rabbinical inculcation?

In contrast to the Israelite dispersion, the Jewish Diaspora (dispersion) began in 70 A.D., with the destruction of the City of Jerusalem by Titus, the general who was in command of the Roman army. Jesus told these Jews that "the kingdom shall be taken from you" and that the City would be utterly destroyed because of its iniquity. Since the rabbis of Judaism refused to accept Him as the Messiah, they continued practicing their religion of deception; but Yahweh gave them a taste of His wrath, a foretaste, if you will, for their complete destruction has been prophesied to occur on the Day of Judgment, where they will all be judged "according to their works."

Their last stand, near Jerusalem, was at Masada; and Judaism was wiped from the face of the land until the Zionists re-invaded with the help of the corrupt British government and their Zionist masters, the house of Rothschild. It was the Balfour Declaration which gave Palestine back to the anti-Christ Jews, so they could claim their version of "the return to the Promised Land." This is nothing less than the biblically prophesied masquerade by the Jews as "the Chosen People" ("...and another [who is not Jacob-Israel] shall…

surname himself with the name of Israel." -- Isa. 44:5), a charade which, according to John of Patmos, "deceiveth the whole world." The book of Obadiah describes the ultimate destruction of the children of Edom; and the modern State of "Israel" is the regathering of Edom for their final destruction by Yahweh at the battle of Armageddon, which is not far from Jerusalem.

Today’s modern rabbis, by continuing this deception to the bitter end, are leading the Jewish people down a trail of tears, bloodshed and violence. Many Jews are confused as to why they are hated so much by all peoples of the world. It is their religion which is to blame; and Zionism is the most virulent expression of Judaism. The fact is that, before Zionism, many rabbis were content to stay with the ghetto model of existence: a small Jewish community surrounded by goyim with the rabbis acting as the middlemen in all relations with the goyim. This provided the rabbis with a tremendous sense of importance, for they would always be negotiating with the outside while bragging to the ghetto residents what great work is being done on their behalf.

Zionism is simply the ambition of Judaism spilled over the ghetto walls. If not Zionism, then something else just as unrestrained and demanding of Jewish success would emerge. This is not morality. This is schizophrenia bred by conceit, the conceit that is bred into all Jews who are whipped up by the "Chosen People" lie. All of this "return to the Promised Land" talk is empty rhetoric because the "Holy Land" does not belong to the Jews. It never did. They stole it from True Israel the first time and they are trying to steal it again.

It was the unfortunate role of Russia to become heir to the Jewish problem when the Czars, like Hyrcanus II of Judah, incorporated the Jewish nation of the Khazars into their Christian nation. These Khazars, descendants of Shem’s brother, Japheth, were converted to Judaism around 800 A.D. Joseph, King of the Khazars, invited a number of Sephardic rabbis to his country and these rabbis organized the people according to the same principles as the Pharisees did in the time of Christ. Later, when the Jews of Khazaria proved to be ungovernable, the Russian Czars created the Pale, a ghetto district of huge proportions to which the Czars hoped the Jews would stay confined. This was not to be, for the Jews of the Pale organized one political assassination after another and drove the Russian people crazy.

In order to stop the Jewish violence, Czar Nicholas II gave the Jews full rights of citizenship, including access to education, government, the press, etc. To the Czar’s dismay, rather than placating the Jews, these measures emboldened them even more. The Russian leadership, found, to their amazement, that the assassinations and subterfuge got even worse, because it allowed the Jews to infiltrate the government, the military, the press and the educational establishment, all with the support of the Jewish bankers outside of Russia.

With help from European and American Jews such as the Rothschilds, the Warburgs, and Jacob Schiff, the Jews of the Pale created communism and succeeded in exterminating Christianity from Russia. For this crime against humanity the Jews must surely suffer; and it was the rabbis of the Pale who encouraged and rabble-roused this genocide into its execution.

If you read the Gospels and just about any page of the New Testament, you will find unending condemnations of the Jews and their religion. Jesus refers to their religion as "the tradition of the elders," "the commandments of men," "the synagogue of Satan," etc. The essence of the Christ’s complaint is that, contrary to what the Jews claim, they do not – nor have they ever – practiced the religion of the Old Testament. "...for they say and do not." (Matt. 23:3.) This TRUE religion has been referred to as Mosaism or even Hebrewism, but the Bible does not give it a name, save to call it "the Law." Jesus himself refers to the Old Testament as "the law and the prophets." Notice that He does not include the rabbis as practitioners of the Law. Rather, He specifically excludes them for their elitism: "But be ye not called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren." (Matt. 23:8.) Would the Talmud permit Rabbi Weiss to consider me, a non-Jew, his equal?

The fact that Jesus condemned the rabbis as "the synagogue of Satan" is also confirmation that He was not a Jew. The religion of Jesus and the religion of the Pharisees stand in diametric opposition. His is the religion of truth. Theirs is the religion of lies. When the rabbis claim that "Jesus was a Jew," they say this only to dupe gullible Christians into believing that Jewish heritage and Christian heritage are the same. As they say, nothing could be further from the truth.

Judaism is the intellectual heritage of the scribes and Pharisees. Every rabbi is the direct recipient of this heritage through the Pharisees. The Bible tells us "Beware the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy." (Luke 12:1). Virtually every page of the four Gospels contains some revelation of how the Pharisees lie, cheat, steal, deceive, and otherwise manipulate their flock of regimented sheep. Indeed, the Book of Matthew is nothing but one prolonged diatribe against the rabbis and their religion. (If so-called Christians would actually read their Bibles, they would know these things.) Jesus identifies the scribes and Pharisees as "the children of the devil" whose father is the "the father of lies." If you are a Christian and you have read the New Testament, there is only one possible conclusion: Judaism is the religion of lies, deception, hypocrisy, and murder. Just look at the Israeli State today. See it for what it really is: Chauvinism practicing genocide in the name of God.

To understand the nature of Jewry’s on-going historical deception, one must realize, as we have said, that there is a difference between a Judahite and a Jew. A Judahite is a pure-blooded descendant of the Tribe of Judah. A Jew is one who practices the religion of Judaism. The rabbis are always doing their utmost to blur this distinction. It is, in fact, extremely rare to find a Judahite who practices the religion called Judaism.

The vast majority of Jews (99.95%?) have either no Judahite blood in them or at best 50%. The Ashkenazi branch of Jewry (the Khazars) has no Shemitic blood in them whatever (see Arthur Koestler, Alfred Lilienthal, Benjamin Freedman, among others). A given Sephardic Jew may have as much as 50% Israelite blood, but 50% does not qualify for admission into the Tribe of Judah because the Bible defines Judahites as being only those who are 100% pure-blooded Israelites of the Tribe of Judah. It is only because the rabbis have dispensed with the 100% rule that they can pretend to call themselves Israelites or Shemites.

The rabbis and the upper classes of Jews (Oberjuden) have practiced race-mixing for fun and profit for centuries. And, contrary to the Bible, which reckons descent through the father, the Jews count descent only through the mother. These are but two of the thousands of ways in which Judaism differs from or denies the Torah. As Jesus said, they have their own tradition.

The Judahite – not Jewish – historian Josephus declares his genealogical descent as a true Judahite of the Tribe of Benjamin and also confirms that the Pharisees were a vile and cunning sect who would often stoop to the murder of their religious and political enemies. This is exactly what they did to Jesus. For a modern rabbi to get up and say that his religion is the heritage of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is just another vainglorious lie, and a big one at that, a lie which spits in the face of God. This makes any talk of a Jewish "return to the Holy Land" even more ridiculous because it is the rabbis who made this land unholy in the first place.

Contrary to Rabbi Weiss’s claim, the Jews are not the Israelites of the Old Testament. The Old Testament specifically forbids the Israelites to intermarry with non-Israelite tribes. The reason for this purging of non-Israelite blood was to ensure that Jesus Christ would be born, for only the Adamic race of Hebrew/Shemitic/Abrahamite/Israelite people could produce the genetic qualities necessary for a Spirit-filled, sinless, modest and virtuous maiden such as Mary. Bear in mind that nowhere in the Old Testament are any of these patriarchs referred to as "Jews." The reason for this is because the Jews did not come into existence until around 150 B.C. with the rise to power of the sect of the Pharisees. To designate, retroactively, any group before this time as "Jews" is either a deliberate misrepresentation or an ignorant statement. (It would be just as erroneous to refer to the pre-colonial native inhabitants of North America as "Americans." There was no such designation until America was created by the White (Israelite) colonists.)

According to virtually all historians -- Jews and goyim alike, including Josephus -- the Pharisees did not practice the pure Law as did Noah, Shem, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, David and Jesus. The Pharisees, from the beginning, practiced politically motivated race-mixing, whenever such practice could gain them money or power. This is a direct violation of the Mosaic Law. To repeat, so that there is no mistake, when John Hyrcanus, one of the last pure-blooded Judahites to reign over Judah, conquered the neighboring nation of Idumea, he also broke the Mosaic Law by submitting these same Idumeans to circumcision and accepting them as "Israelites." He had no biblical authority to do this. This was the action of a corrupt king seeking an ally in a time of war. This eventually led to an Idumean by the name of Herod becoming the king of Judea.

It was Herod’s father, Antipater, who, as high priest, connived and conspired with the Romans to replace the pure-blooded Judahite dynasty and priesthood with Idumeans. Both Antipater and Herod were guilty of murdering pure-blooded Judahite priests and replacing them with Idumean Edomites. The consequence of these developments is very plain: the Pharisees were a primarily non-Israelite, non-Mosaic sect whose main claim to fame is their dual pretense of 1.) being racial descendants of the Tribes of Israel, and 2.) being the teachers of the Mosaic Law.

Of course, neither claim is true. When Jesus told the Apostles not to preach to the Judeans, He said "go ye rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." By the time of Christ, the "house of Israel" was a specific, biblical reference to the "Ten Lost Tribes" which had already been scattered abroad, from the Caucasus Mountains in the East to Ireland in the West. This is exactly what the Apostles did because these were the true "lost sheep" of the House of Israel. Paul even went as far as Britain to preach the Gospel – wherever he could find true Israelites. And Britain was where the very first Christian church was founded in 37 A.D. at Glastonbury by Joseph of Arimathea, Mary’s uncle.

Beginning in 721 B.C., 550 years before there was ever a "Jew" in the world, these Israelites of the House of Israel were deported from their homes in northern Palestine to northern Media, just south of the Caucasus. From there, to escape their captivity, they migrated north and west into Asia Minor and Europe. It is to these "dispersed of Israel" to whom the entire New Testament is addressed. It is not addressed to the Jews, because the Jews never practiced the undoctored Mosaic Law, nor were the Jews ever counted among pure-blooded Israelites. (They counted themselves in, but no true Judahite would ever consider them as kin.) The fact that the Jews were not dispersed from Judea until 70 A.D. is further proof that they are NOT the people of the dispersion to whom the New Testament is addressed. And since Judaism is the rejection of Jesus Christ, there is no way the disciples of Jesus would waste their breath on these reprobates, nor did He expect them to do so. Indeed, the Apostle Stephen, the first Christian martyr, was stoned to death by the Jews for denouncing them.

The Book of James begins with these words: "...to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting." Since it is now known by the Christian Identity church (True Israel) that many members of the Tribes of Judah and Benjamin were taken captive by the Assyrians around 700 B.C., it is evident that James knew this also, so that James is indeed addressing all twelve Tribes. He could not possibly have been addressing the Jews, who neither wanted to hear the Gospel, nor had they yet been dispersed from Judea. Furthermore, the Jews had relations with the Tribe of Judah only, because the Benjamites, Nazarenes and Galileans would have nothing to do with them. This is further proof that the Jews are not Israelites. The Essenes were strict separatists who practiced the pure, unadulterated Mosaic Law, a fact which is proven by the Dead Sea Scrolls. They were not Jews either.

Rabbi Weiss himself knows that he is not an Israelite. When he claims that Judaism "is the belief that the Creator revealed to the Jewish people, at Mount Sinai, the Torah," he is very careful and correct in using the word ‘belief,’ because the rabbis know better. They know that this is not true, although it is their first priority to make sure that everybody else believes it. They know that the Torah was delivered to Israelites, not to Jews. "Hey, Stupid, listen to this" is their attitude toward the goyim.

This historic truth must be repeated in order to counteract the mountain of lies by which the Jews deceive us daily: The Jews did not come into existence as an ethnic group until 140 B.C. with the simultaneous development of the religion of Judaism and the mixture of Edomite and Judahite blood. The Jewish Encyclopedia even admits this mixture of Edomite blood into their people: "Edom is in Jewry." (1925 Edition, Volume 5, p. 41). By the time of Christ, this priesthood and this religion had thoroughly corrupted and distorted the Torah; and they have yet to admit this publicly, although a simple comparison of the Talmud and the Bible is more than enough evidence to prove Judaism’s anti-Mosaic character.

A perfect example of the Jewish method of myth-making is the picture on p. 19 of the article about Rabbi Weiss. This is a very simple case of false captioning. Anyone can draw a picture and write a caption underneath which explains what the picture is about. In this case, it is a depiction of the Golden Calf scene and Israel’s refusal to obey God’s Law. The fact is that the Golden Calf incident has nothing to do with the Jewish Diaspora, although the caption implies that the Jewish Diaspora followed as a result of such events. This particular incident happened around 1450 B.C., 1300 years before any Jews ever existed. The Israelites who were dispersed for their disobedience were the very "house of Israel" which became known as the Ten Lost Tribes. And even this did not happen until 700 years after the Golden Calf incident. But the simple localization of a picture with the word ‘Jews’ is all that is required to mislead. Such simple, often ingenious and repeated myth-making is the essence of Judaism’s representation of itself to the outside world. It is just part of the historical charade by which Judaism and Jewry claim a supposed antiquity.

A more recent example of such myth-making is the creation of the word ‘Judeo-Christian’ probably in the 1930's. As can be imagined, there is no ground of agreement between Jesus and the rabbis, so this word is just another tool in the arsenal of Jewish lies which are designed to deceive Christians into thinking that there is some commonality between Judaism and Christianity. If there was none between Jesus and the rabbis, there is none between Jews and Christians, no matter what pseudo-Fundamentalists like Jerry Falsewell and Jack (showbiz-smile) Van Impe might say – except that the Christians have believed a lie. Rabbi Weiss is just as good as any other rabbi who spreads this Jewish misrepresentation and doublespeak. It is my belief that Rabbi Weiss and his organization, Neturei Karta, are simply cut from the same cloth of deception, like the "Jews for Jesus." He and Neturei Karta pretend to be anti-Zionist just so that Willis Carto, the publisher of the Barnes Review, might hope against hope that there is such a thing as a "good rabbi" in this world. We Christians, because we have been brought up not to tell lies, cannot imagine the extremes to which the Jewish tribe will go in order to deceive us; and Neturei Karta is just such a deception.

Rabbi Weiss, if I am wrong, PROVE IT. Tell us who funds your group. Tell us that your precious Talmud is not the teaching of the Devil himself! Prove to me that you teach the Torah only and not the mixture of truth and lies which is the Talmud. If you can prove this, then I might consider the possibility that there is such a thing as a "good rabbi."

Interestingly, Jewish mythology never mentions the fact that God issued the House of Israel "a writ of divorcement" with the intention of sending her into the wilderness for her purification. Through this migratory purification, the House of Israel was to become humble again, enough to receive the Law through Messiah – which they did. This mass migration is the event which proved that Israel would be "known by another name." (Isaiah 62:2; 65:15; Hosea 2:1) God tells us in the Book of Genesis, speaking to Abraham concerning his son, Isaac, "In Isaac shall thy seed be called." (Gen. 21:12) The Jews, of course, never quote this prophecy with reference to their claim as the "chosen people" because they cannot demonstrate descent through Isaac. After the "Ten Lost Tribes" started migrating north and west from the Caucasus, the existing peoples of the area, including the Greeks and Romans, referred to them as "the House of Isaac," since Isaac was their patriarch. The word they used was ‘Saccae.’ A variation of ‘Saccae" was ‘Scythian.’ And as Isaac’s Sons (the Anglo-Saxons) we are still known today. Even the word ‘German’ is a reference to the Saccae, because it means "authentic." Authentic what? Authentic Saxon. They used the word to distinguish the authentic Saxons from mixed peoples, such as the Sarmatians.

The Jews reject the Messiah in spite of the fact that Jesus fulfilled over 300 prophecies of the Messiah’s coming and mission. Jesus had ‘Messiah’ written all over him, but the Pharisees rejected Him because they preferred to hold on to their wolves-in-sheep’s-clothing con game, which is today known as "Judaism."

No matter what any rabbi says, there is no truth whatsoever to the claim that the Jews invented monotheism. They borrowed the concept from the Law of the Bible and claimed to have invented it. Mosaism existed and was practiced by True Israel for many centuries before any rabbi ever issued a Talmudic opinion about monotheism. The same is true of any rabbinical pronouncement. The Jewish religion is a johnny-come-lately pretending to be the original. It is not the original. Even worse, it is the denial of the "law and the prophets" because rabbinical opinions, according to their own "holy" book, the Talmud, always overrule the Torah. Realize that this means that, in the minds of the rabbis, their opinions overrule the Word of God.

Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism...throughout these changes in name...the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives, unaltered..." -- Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, The Pharisees, the Sociological Background of Their Faith. Do any of the world’s mouthpieces of Judaism cite this fact from the rooftops or on Public Zionvision where the Chosen People myth is broadcast daily? Do you think that Jesus Christ would still condemn them for their unaltered tradition? I know He will, because He told us in the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares that He would do exactly that; and the world would finally be rid of this pestilence called Judaism. The tares would be reaped and cast into the fire, just as the book of Obadiah describes. It would be well considered for all Jews who might come across this message to reconsider the foundations and teachings of their faith, for by this faith will they be led into perdition. Their only hope is to confess Jesus Christ as their teacher and their Messiah. Listen, Jew and Jewess, this is your last chance before ultimate destruction. Yahweh Himself has said so in the word that you reject.

Most of Rabbi Weiss’s criticisms of Zionism are accurate. For example, when he says that the Sephardic rabbis in Palestine resisted the early attempts of the Zionists to invade Palestine, he is correct. After all, these were the indigenous rabbis who had the most to lose from this influx of Ashkenazi people. The Ashkenazis would surely soon outnumber the Sephardim, and their little bishoprics would collapse under the weight. They would have to learn a whole new school of religious propaganda. Nobody likes to have change forced upon them. Also, the Sephardim looked upon the Ashkenazim as a lower class of Jews, because the Sephardic rabbis knew well that the Ashkenazim are not a "Semitic" people; but the Ashkenazim were the ones who had Rothschild’s trillions to support any kind of assault upon Palestine. Money talks.

These facts are at odds with another statement made by Rabbi Weiss: "The spread of Zionism to Eastern Europe resulted in fierce condemnations by the Rabbinic leadership." This statement is disingenuous, at best. The reason it is disingenuous is because Zionism did not spread to Eastern Europe. Zionsim was born in Eastern Europe. It was the activism of the Jews in southern Russia (formerly Khazaria) which was responsible for the rise of two of the world’s most disgusting ideas: communism and Zionism. Certainly there was much debate among the rabbis as to how or whether to implement these strategies; but implement them they did. And this could not have happened without the encouragement of the rabbis, although some of them had to be persuaded by Rothschild money to go beyond the ghetto (i.e., "beyond the Pale"), for the Talmud had always taught the ideal of Jewish supremacism. It was Rothschild money that made the impossible dream a reality.

"Nobody knows that Zionism appeared as a Marxist movement, a socialist one...Zionism is actually a revolution." – Sergei Lezov, Strana i Mir Magazine (Munich), #3, 1988, p.94. "The ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism." – Jewish Chronicle, April 4th, 1919 (London).

Communism is Judaism forcibly imposed upon the goyim. As proof of this, just look at how many millions of Christians were slaughtered by the Bolsheviks. Look at how many Christian churches were destroyed, priests murdered, nuns raped, women collectivized, workers gulagized and intellectuals tortured. Christian blood flowed along the gutters of Bolshevik Russia. The Jews of Soviet Russia lived in comparative splendor. Few synagogues were ever touched until Stalin’s purges, and no Jew was so much as interrogated unless he were suspected of being a closet Christian. Before the purges, Stalin, in deference to his Jewish masters, had made "anti-Semitism" a crime punishable by death. His purges simply replaced disloyal Jews with more loyal Jews. Why have the Eastern Europeans always been so "anti-Semitic?" They are the ones who remember these atrocities and the Jews who committed them.

Bolshevism was not a Jewish aberration. Bolshevism is Judaism, period. Marx, Engels, Trotsky, Schiff, Rothschild, Moses Hess, Parvus, Rosa Luxemburg, Bela Kun: these names that are listed in the Jewish Hall of Fame – a murderer’s row if there ever was one. Can anyone seriously believe that these are "God’s Chosen People?" The question is: Which g-d have these j-ws chosen to worship? To which g-d do they pray when they lust for revenge? Could the reality be that they worship S-t-n, not G-d? Does not Yahshua (Jesus Christ) tell us that they are the children of the devil? How do we know? "By their fruits shall ye know them."

The Terrible Power of the Jewish Purse

At the same time and in the same place and by the same people, in southern Russia, the strategy of Zionism took shape. The two movements would provide the ideological pincers between which Christendom would be cut in half: the one half would be propagandized to support Zionism (Fundamentalist Christians and the "capitalist" West); the other half would be propagandized to support communism (liberals and Jews); and numerous Jewish bankers would finance both sides at the same time while the goyim would fight it out, spilling rivers of Christian blood and lakes of tears on European soil, unknowingly sacrificing themselves for Jewish profit and thinking that they were making the world "safe for democracy." The old saying of the Middle Ages was "War is the Jew’s harvest." The Twentieth Century is thorough proof of this maxim, if you have eyes that see.

By this means of deception on the grandest of all scales, supported by the Zionist bankers, Talmudic Judaism would vanquish its supposed enemies. As Theodore Herzl, a Rothschild protege and the founder of the Zionist International, said, "When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party; when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse." – from his book, The Jewish State.

Rabbi Weiss’s complaint that this is not the true Judaism rings hollow – just as hollow as the leftist apologies that "real, compassionate communism has always been sabotaged by dictators." If it weren’t so tragic, it would be funny. The list of Zionist terrorists and murderers is just as long as the Bolshevist list: Begin, Shamir, Ben Gurion, Netanyahu, Sharon, Rothschild.... In almost every case, the communist is also a Zionist. Imagine that: communism and capitalism manipulated by the same coterie of international schemers! If you still don’t understand, look at the partnerships: Marx (communist) and Engels (capitalist); Trotsky (communist) and Schiff (banker). Intellectuals from both the Left and the Right will never be able to accept the fact that they have been such pitiful patsies!

The question is: "What is it about Judaism that gives rise to such monsters, megalomaniacs, and terrorists?" This is the question I would like Rabbi Weiss to answer. Do you think that he is prepared to face such a debate which would bring out the most shameful facts? No. All we hear is the hypocritical ring of "I wouldn’t dignify such an accusation with an answer!" They still don’t seem to realize that they soon will have to answer to God.

As the Bible says, "Beware the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy." (Luke, 12:1.)

Wake up, Christian Israel, as the Day of Judgment approaches, your immortal soul is the price you will pay if you take the wrong path. As Jesus said: "Those who are not for me are against me." The dumbest thing you will ever do is to oppose Him, your King. We pray, "Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done."

Yahweh bless you, keep you, and raise you up. To Jew and Christian alike: "Repent, for the Day of Judgment is at hand." There is still hope for you if you will honor your Father by accepting His Son. Amen.

– Eli James